Anorectal Malformations (Part 2)

Sushmita Bhatnagar*

Department of Pediatric Surgery, B.J.Wadia Hospital for Children, Mumbai

Correspondence: *. Sushmita Bhatnagar, Professor, Department of Pediatric Surgery, BJ Wadia Children Hospital, Mumbai Consultant Pediatric Surgeon, Bombay Hospital institute of Medical Sciences, Mumbai, India E-mail: .

Received: 2015 March 27; Accepted: 2015 March 30

J Neonat Surg. 2015 Apr 1; 4(2): 25

Copyright

Copyright: © 2015 JNS


(This section is meant for residents to check their understanding regarding a particular topic)

Questions

  1. Q.1. What are the pre-operative workup/investigations necessary for a baby born with ARM?
  2. Q. 2. Briefly describe the aims and details of surgical management of anorectal malformations.

Answers

Answer 1

As discussed in the first part, anorectal malformations represent a wide spectrum of anomalies involving more than one system. Also, the pre-operative work up differs in boys and girls (Tables 1 and 2). The pre-operative work up could be discussed under the following headings:

  1. a) For diagnosis of type of anorectal anomaly
  2. b) For associated anomalies
  3. c) For spinal abnormalities
  4. d) For perineal musculature


[Figure ID: F1] Table 1: Investigations for boys with anorectal anomalies.

[Figure ID: F2] Figure 1: Positioning of the baby for Cross Table Prone Lateral X-Ray.

[Figure ID: F3] Figure 2: Interpretation of Invertogram or CTPL X-ray.

[Figure ID: F4] Table 2: Investigations for Anorectal malformations in girls

Some of the associated anomalies significantly impact the overall outcome in patients with anorectal malformations, so they must be evaluated at birth (Table 3).


[Figure ID: F5] Table 3: Investigations for associated anomalies

Preoperative MRI of the pelvis and perineum is indicated for perineal musculature and the delineation of the sphincter complex in selected cases. MRI is helpful in thorough evaluation of the following (2):

  1. a. Quality and shape of muscles responsible for fecal continence.
  2. b. Location of bowel and its relation to the muscle complex.
  3. c. Level of fistula and posterior urethral diverticulum.
  4. d. Sacral spinal anomalies, if any.
  5. e. Associated genitourinary anomalies.

Apart from pre-operative evaluation, MRI also assists in prognostication of the long-term outcome and the quality of life of the child with anorectal malformation.

Answer 2

The most important aim of the surgical correction is to create a normal anus with anatomic reconstruction. Surgery should help the child to achieve a socially acceptable bowel function and should ensure avoiding fecal incontinence, urinary incontinence or sexual dysfunction.

The choices of surgical correction are as follows:

  1. a. Primary repair – both boys and girls (3-6)
  2. b. Staged repair – usually 3 stages:
    1. i. Colostomy – most probably high sigmoid loop in left iliac fossa.
    2. ii. Pull through – Posterior sagittal approach, abdomino-perineal approach, abdominal posterior sagittal approach, laparoscopic approach – in boys; anterior sagittal approach, anal transposition, posterior sagittal, abdomino-perineal, abdominal posterior sagittal approach – in girls.
    3. iii. Colostomy closure.

The various surgical techniques that have been used for the management of anorectal malformations have been tabulated below:


[Figure ID: F6] Table 4: Evolution of surgical treatment of Anorectal Malformations

To summarize, the management of anorectal malformations, which differs in boys and girls, algorithms are presented for each respectively (Fig. 3 and 4)


[Figure ID: F7] Figure 3: Algorithm for management of Male ARM at birth.

[Figure ID: F8] Figure 4: Algorithm for management of female Anorectal malformations at birth.

Footnotes

Source of Support: Nil

Conflict of Interest: The author is editor of the journal. The manuscript is independently handled by other editors and she is not involved in decision making about the manuscript.


References
1. Narasimharao KL, Prasad GR, Katariya S, Yadav K, Mitra SK, Pathak IC. Prone cross-table lateral view: an alternative to the invertogram in imperforate anus. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983; 140:227-9.
2. McHugh K, Dudley NE, Tam P. Pre-operative MRI of anorectal anomalies in the newborn period. Pediatr Radiol. 1995;25 Suppl 1:S33-6.
3. Goon HK. Repair of anorectal anomalies in the neonatal period. Pediatr Surg Int. 1990; 5:246-9.
4. Moore TC. Advantages of performing the sagittal anoplasty operation for imperforate anus at birth. J Pediatr Surg. 1990; 25:276-7.
5. Upadhyaya VD, Gopal SC, Gupta DK, Gangopadhyaya AN, Sharma SP, Kumar V. Single stage repair of anovestibular fistula in neonate. Pediatr Surg Int. 2007;23:737-40.
6. Menon P, Rao KL. Primary anorectoplasty in females with common anorectal malformations without colostomy. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42:1103-6.
7. Stephens FD. Congenital imperforated rectum, recto-urethral and recto-vaginal fistulae. Aust N Z J Surg. 1953; 22:161–72.
8. Rhoads JE, Pipes RL, Randall JP. A simultaneous abdominal and perineal approach in operations for imperforate anus with atresia of the rectum and rectosigmoid. Ann Surg.1948; 127:552–6.
9. Rehbein F. Imperforate anus: Experiences with abdomino-perineal and abdomino-sacro-perineal pull-through procedures. J Pediatr Surg. 1967; 2:99–105.
10. Kiesewetter WB. Imperforate anus II. The rationale and technique of the sacroabdominoperineal operation. J Pediatr Surg. 1967; 2:106–9.
11. Mollard P, Marechal JK, de Beaujeu MJ. Surgical treatment of high imperforate anus with definition of the puborectalis sling by an anterior perineal approach. J Pediatr Surg. 1978; 13: 499-504.
12. Iwai N, Yanagihara J, Tokiwa K, Deguchi E, Takahashi T. Results of surgical correction of anorectal malformations. A 10-30 year follow-up. Ann Surg. 1988; 207:219-22.
13. Peña A, Devries PA. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: Important technical considerations and new applications. J Pediatr Surg. 1982; 17:796–811.
14. Georgeson KE, Inge TH, Albanese CT. Laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through for high imperforate anus- A new technique. J Pediatr Surg. 2000; 35:927–30.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2015 Journal of Neonatal Surgery

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The Journal of Neonatal Surgery has been indexed Google Scholar, NewJour, Open J-gate, Science Central, eDoctoronline, Ulrichsweb, Scirus, JournalTOCs, ResearchGate, Scribed, FreeJournalAct, Anoox, News-Digest, CORE.

EL-MED-Pub Publishers