Diagnostic Value of Whole-Body Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging (WBD-MRI) in Comparison with PET/CT in Assessment of Multiple Myeloma and Bone Metastasis

Authors

  • Mohamed A. Hammad
  • Hossam Mohammed Zayton
  • Omar Ahmed Hasanin
  • Mohammed Mahmoud Dawoud
  • Hwaida Mohammed Mokhtar

Keywords:

Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography, Multiple Myeloma, Bone Metastasis

Abstract

Background: Diffusion weighted imaging-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DWI-MRI) is a functional MRI technique measuring movement of water molecules within tissue. While positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET/CT) is a functional imaging modality reflecting metabolic activity, increase uptake of the radiotracer 18F- fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is indicative of viable bone marrow lesion of myeloma and bone metastasis. The aim of this work was to assess diagnostic value of whole-body diffusion (WBD) MRI in comparison to FDG PET/CT in detection diffuse and focal bone marrow involvement of multiple myeloma (MM), as well as bone metastasis.

Methods: This prospective study was carried out on 62 patients, 38 patients with MM confirmed by bone marrow aspiration and 24 primary malignancy and metastatic bony lesions.

Results: PET/CT can predict MM in skull, thoracic cage, pelvis, spine and long bone respectively (P= 1, 1, 0.625, 1 and 1) with sensitivity 60%, 75%, 66.7%, 85.7% and 66.7%, specificity 66.7%, 66.7%, 66.7%, 66.7% and 50%. In comparison between PET/CT and MRI- WBD, MRI-WBD is better than PET/CT in detection of MM bone marrow lesions and metastatic bony lesions with sensitivity, accuracy, negative and positive predictive value, but have the same specificity.

Conclusions: Whole body MRI-DWI and apparent diffusion coefficient values significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy in detection of MM bone marrow lesions and bone metastatic lesions, with relatively higher sensitivity and accuracy than PET/CT study. WBD-MRI seems to be a promising method of imaging in the detection of MM and bone metastasis. Standardization of these protocols is needed

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Tirumani SH, Sakellis C, Jacene H, Shinagare AB, Munshi NC, Ramaiya NH, et al. Role of FDG-PET/CT in extramedullary multiple myeloma: Correlation of FDG-PET/CT findings with clinical outcome.Clin Nucl Med.2016;41:7-13.

Bladé J, de Larrea CF, Rosiñol L. Extramedullary involvement in multiple myeloma.Haematologica.2012;97:1618-9.

Leung N, Heybeli C, editors. Kidney Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma and Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance. Seminars in Nephrology; 2024: Elsevier.

Horger M, Weisel K, Horger W, Mroue A, Fenchel M, Lichy M. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping for early response monitoring in multiple myeloma: preliminary results.AJR Am J Roentgenol.2011;196:790-5.

Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, Blade J, Merlini G, Mateos MV, et al. International myeloma working group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma.Lancet Oncol.2014;150:538-48.

Hillengass J and Landgren O. Challenges and opportunities of novel imaging in monoclonal plasma cell disorders: imaging “early myeloma”.Leuk Lymphoma.2013;54:1355-63.

Pawlyn C, Fowkes L, Otero S, Jones JR, Boyd KD, Davies FE, et al. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI: a new gold standard for assessing disease burden in patients with multiple myeloma?Leukemia.2016;30:1446-8.

Hong S, Youk T, Lee SJ, Kim KM, Vajdic CM. Bone metastasis and skeletal-related events in patients with solid cancer: A Korean nationwide health insurance database study.PLoS One.2020;15:15-20.

Stecco A, Trisoglio A, Soligo E, Berardo S, Sukhovei L, Carriero A. Whole-Body MRI with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Bone Metastases: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel).2018;8.

Baltzer P, Mann RM, Iima M, Sigmund EE, Clauser P, Gilbert FJ, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast-a consensus and mission statement from the EUSOBI International Breast Diffusion-Weighted Imaging working group.Eur Radiol.2020;30:1436-50.

Linet MS, Slovis TL, Miller DL, Kleinerman R, Lee C, Rajaraman P, et al. Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures.CA Cancer J Clin.2012;62:75-100.

Shortt CP, Gleeson TG, Breen KA, McHugh J, O'Connell MJ, O'Gorman PJ, et al. Whole-body MRI versus PET in assessment of multiple myeloma disease activity. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:980-6.

Araz M, Aras G, Küçük Ö N. The role of 18F-NaF PET/CT in metastatic bone disease.J Bone Oncol.2015;40:92-7.

Shawky M, Ali ZAE, Hashem DH, Houseni M. Role of positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in breast cancer.EJRNM.2020;51:1-8.

Dimopoulos M, Terpos E, Comenzo RL, Tosi P, Beksac M, Sezer O, et al. International myeloma working group consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple Myeloma.Leukemia.2009;23:1545-56.

O'Sullivan GJ, Carty FL, Cronin CG. Imaging of bone metastasis: An update.World J Radiol.2015;17:202-11.

Mesguich C, Hulin C, Latrabe V, Lascaux A, Bordenave L, Hindié E, et al. Prospective comparison of 18-FDG PET/CT and whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI in the assessment of multiple myeloma.Ann Hematol.2020;99:2869-80.

Pawlyn C, Fowkes L, Otero S, Jones JR, Boyd KD, Davies FE, et al. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI: a new gold standard for assessing disease burden in patients with multiple myeloma?Leukemia.2016;30:1446-8.

Westerland O, Amlani A, Kelly-Morland C, Fraczek M, Bailey K, Gleeson M, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic performance and impact on management of 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI in multiple myeloma.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging.2021;48:2558-65.

Dyrberg E, Hendel HW, Al-Farra G, Balding L, Løgager VB, Madsen C, et al. A prospective study comparing whole-body skeletal X-ray survey with 18F-FDG-PET/CT, 18F-NaF-PET/CT and whole-body MRI in the detection of bone lesions in multiple myeloma patients.Acta Radiol Open.2017;60:5-10.

Messiou C, Porta N, Sharma B, Levine D, Koh DM, Boyd K, et al. Prospective evaluation of whole-body MRI versus FDG PET/CT for lesion detection in participants with myeloma.Radiol Imaging Cancer.2021;13:21-30.

Stecco A, Trisoglio A, Soligo E, Berardo S, Sukhovei L, Carriero A. Whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging in bone metastases: A narrative review.Diagnostics (Basel).2018;8:18-25.

Morone M, Bali MA, Tunariu N, Messiou C, Blackledge M, Grazioli L, et al. Whole-body MRI: Current applications in oncology.AJR Am J Roentgenol.2017;209:336-49.

Takenaka D, Ohno Y, Matsumoto K, Aoyama N, Onishi Y, Koyama H, et al. Detection of bone metastases in non-small cell lung cancer patients: comparison of whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), whole-body MR imaging without and with DWI, whole-body FDG-PET/CT, and bone scintigraphy.J Magn Reson Imaging.2009;30:298-308.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-12

How to Cite

1.
Hammad MA, Zayton HM, Hasanin OA, Dawoud MM, Mokhtar HM. Diagnostic Value of Whole-Body Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging (WBD-MRI) in Comparison with PET/CT in Assessment of Multiple Myeloma and Bone Metastasis. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025May12 [cited 2025Dec.7];14(21S):1397-408. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/5699