Multi Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of Post Operative Breast

Authors

  • Aya Kamal Mohamed ElSayed
  • Sara Abdelrahman Darwish
  • Mohammed Mahmoud Dawoud
  • Mohamed Fouad Sherif
  • Mohamed Hassan El Shafaey

Keywords:

Multi Parametric Magnetic Resonance, Post Operative Breast, Total Choline, Diffusion Weighted Imaging

Abstract

Background: Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MPMRI) is essential for assessing regional axillary nodes, finding concealed breast cancer, and figuring out the cancer's spread.  Investigating the diagnostic efficacy of multi-parametric breast MRI in the post-operative breast assessment was the aim of this study.

Methods: This prospective study included 40 female patients, aged 34 to 77 years, who had post-operative breast conditions. Each patient underwent evaluation using MPMRI.

Results: Sensitivity of the kinetic curves for detection of malignant masses was 91.67 % and specificity was 88.89%. Total choline (t-Cho) was significantly lower in benign lesions than in malignant lesions, with a cut - off value of 2, this gives a sensitivity of 83.33%, the specificity 77.78% and accuracy 80.95. The role of Multi parametric MRI in predicting the presence of a tumor was significant, with a high sensitivity (91.67%), specificity (92.86%), along with a significant (P <0.001). These metrics demonstrate MPMRI effectiveness in accurately identifying tumors, offering a reliable diagnostic tool compared to final biopsy results. Recurrence was significantly different between mammography group and MPMRI group (P=0.001).

Conclusions: MP MRI demonstrates significant diagnostic accuracy for identifying recurrent breast cancer after breast surgery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209-49.

Tollan CJ, Pantiora E, Valachis A, Karakatsanis A, Tasoulis MK. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the role of repeat breast-conserving surgery for the management of ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29:6440-53.

Drukteinis JS, Gombos EC, Raza S, Chikarmane SA, Swami A, Birdwell RL. MR imaging assessment of the breast after breast conservation therapy: distinguishing benign from malignant lesions. Radiographics. 2012;32:219-34.

Raghavendra AS, Tripathy D. How does MR imaging help care for the breast cancer patient? Perspective of a medical oncologist. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2018;26:289-93.

Al-Khalili R, Alzeer A, Nguyen GK, Crane EP, Song JH, Jeon JL, et al. Palpable lumps after mastectomy: Radiologic-pathologic review of benign and malignant masses. Radiographics. 2021;41:967-89.

6. Daimiel Naranjo I, Gibbs P, Reiner JS, Lo Gullo R, Sooknanan C, Thakur SB, et al. Radiomics and machine learning with multiparametric breast MRI for improved diagnostic accuracy in breast cancer diagnosis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11:200-40.

Partridge SC, Nissan N, Rahbar H, Kitsch AE, Sigmund EE. Diffusion-weighted breast MRI: Clinical applications and emerging techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;45:337-55.

Tezcan S, Ozturk FU, Uslu N, Akcay EY. The role of combined diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions presenting washout curve. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2021;72:460-9.

Turnbull LW. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis and management of breast cancer. NMR Biomed. 2009;22:28-39.

Patel BK, Davis J, Ferraro C, Kosiorek H, Hasselbach K, Ocal T, et al. Value added of preoperative contrast-enhanced digital mammography in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018;18:1339-45.

Plana MN, Carreira C, Muriel A, Chiva M, Abraira V, Emparanza JI, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative assessment of patients with primary breast cancer: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:26-38.

Li J, Dershaw DD, Lee CH, Joo S, Morris EA. Breast MRI after conservation therapy: usual findings in routine follow-up examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:799-807.

Al Tohamy JI, Mamdouh M, Refaat MM. Role of multiparametric magnetic resonant imaging (MPMRI) in assessment of post operative recurrent breast masses. Benha Med J. 2023;40:140-54.

Teller P, Jefford VJ, Gabram SG, Newell M, Carlson GW. The utility of breast MRI in the management of breast cancer. Breast J. 2010;16:394-403.

Kim SJ, Moon WK, Cho N, Chang JM. The detection of recurrent breast cancer in patients with a history of breast cancer surgery: comparison of clinical breast examination, mammography and ultrasonography. Acta Radiol. 2011;52:15-20.

Kul S, Metin Y, Kul M, Metin N, Eyuboglu I, Ozdemir O. Assessment of breast mass morphology with diffusion-weighted MRI: Beyond apparent diffusion coefficient. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;48:1668-77.

Baltzer PA, Dietzel M, Kaiser WA. Nonmass lesions in magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: additional T2-weighted images improve diagnostic accuracy. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011;35:361-6.

HOSSAM AE-K, MOHAMED MF, EL-CHIMY M. Role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in differentiating post therapeutic changes from recurrent malignant breast lesions. Med J Cairo Univ. 2019;87:4611-8.

Yang S-N, Li F-J, Chen J-M, Zhang G, Liao Y-H, Huang T-C. Kinetic curve type assessment for classification of breast lesions using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. PloS one. 2016;11:152-827.

Amin ES, Elsharawy FA, Mlees MA, EL-Saeid HH, Dawoud MF. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of breast lesions. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2023;54:22-4.

Akın Y, Uğurlu M, Kaya H, Arıbal E. Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient values in the differentiation of breast lesions, histpathologic subgroups and correlatıon with prognostıc factors using 3.0 tesla MR. J Breast Health. 2016;12:123-32.

Ei Khouli RH, Jacobs MA, Mezban SD, Huang P, Kamel IR, Macura KJ, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging. Radiol. 2010;256:64-73.

Hassan NM, Hamad S, Mahar K. Mammogram breast cancer CAD systems for mass detection and classification: a review. Multim Tools Appl. 2022;81:20043-75.

EL-Adalany MA, Emad E. Role of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in evaluation of post-operative breast lesions. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2016;47:631-40.

Raikhlin A, Curpen B, Warner E, Betel C, Wright B, Jong R. Breast MRI as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in high-risk patients: retrospective review. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204:889-97.

Pinker K, Bogner W, Baltzer P, Gruber S, Bickel H, Brueck B, et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the breast using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and 3-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Invest Radiol. 2014;49:421-30.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-10

How to Cite

1.
ElSayed AKM, Darwish SA, Mahmoud Dawoud M, Sherif MF, El Shafaey MH. Multi Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of Post Operative Breast. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Jul.10 [cited 2025Dec.7];14(32S):4679-90. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/8181