Nucleated red blood cells as a potential biomarker for predicting spontaneous intestinal perforation in premature infants
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47338/jns.v12.1159Keywords:
Premature, Spontaneous intestinal perforation, Biomarker, Nucleated red blood cells, Necrotizing enterocolitisAbstract
Background: The specific etiology of spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) remains elusive. Both can present acutely without antecedent signs and can be difficult to differentiate. Neonatal nucleated red blood cell (NRBC) counts are part of the routine admission and serial CBCs drawn on premature neonates. Elevated NRBC counts could represent relative intrauterine hypoxemia, a possible risk factor for the development of SIP or NEC.
Methods: We compared premature neonates with SIP to premature neonates with NEC and controls, matched gestational age (GA) and birth weight (BW). Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-Square, or Fisher's exact tests and univariate and multivariate nominal logistic regression models were used to estimate the association of baseline NRBC. Median times to SIP and NEC were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. All analyses were performed with SAS 9.4.
Results: Male sex (72.5%), lower GA [Median (Q1, Q3): 25.1 (23.8, 28)], and lower BW [Median (Q1, Q3): 690 g (585, 1072)] had the highest incidence of SIP compared to NEC or controls. Increased baseline NRBC was associated with lower odds of developing NEC compared to controls [Median (Q1, Q3): 9 (5, 29) vs 19 (10, 51); OR (CI) 0.70 (0.55, 0.89), p-value = 0.0033]. Increased baseline NRBC was associated with higher odds of developing SIP compared to NEC [Median (Q1, Q3): 9 (5, 29) vs 19 (10, 51); OR (CI) 1.61 (1.18, 2.20) p-value = 0.0027]. There were no significant differences between intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), maternal hypertension, chorioamnionitis, multiple births, or depressed APGAR scores in all three groups. NRBC for SIP neonates remained significantly higher at the day of life (DOL) 1-3 compared to other groups [Median (Q1, Q3): 23 (6, 93), p-value = 0.0020]. The percentage of patients with NRBC >4, remained elevated for patients with SIP as late as week three (p = 0.0023).
Conclusion: ELBW, male sex, and elevated baseline NRBC were significantly associated with the risk of developing SIP compared to NEC or controls. NRBC remained significantly elevated on DOL 1-3, compared to NEC or controls. Between the groups, there were no significant differences in perinatal stressors.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Gordon PV. Understanding intestinal vulnerability to perforation in the extremely low birth weight neonate. Pediatr Res. 2009; 65:138-44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1203/PDR.0b013e31818c7920.
Shah J, Singhal N, Da Silva O, Rouvinez-Bouali N, Seshia M, Lee SK, et al. Intestinal perforation in very preterm neonates: Risk factors and outcomes. J Perinatol. 2015; 35: 595-600. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.41.
Adant I, Miserez M, Naulaers G, Carkeek K, Ortibus E, Aerts R, et al. Long-term outcomes of very low birth weight neonates with spontaneous intestinal perforation: A retrospective case-matched cohort study. J Pediatr Surg. 2019; 54: 2084-91. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.04.012.
Ragouilliaux CJ, Keeney SE, Hawkins HK, Rowen JL. Maternal factors in extremely low birth weight neonates who develop spontaneous intestinal perforation. Pediatr. 2007; 120:1458-64. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-2804.
Wadhawan R, Oh W, Vohr BR, Saha S, Das A, Bell EF, et al. Spontaneous intestinal perforation in extremely low birth weight neonates: association with indomethacin therapy and effects on neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18-22 months corrected age. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013; 98:127-32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2011-300659.
Tiwari C, Sandlas G, Jayaswal S, Shah H. Spontaneous intestinal perforation in neonates. J Neonatal Surg. 2015; 4:14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21699/jns.v4i2.201.
Kampanatkosol R, Thomson T, Habeeb O, Glynn L, Dechristopher PJ, Yong S, et al. The relationship between reticulated platelets, intestinal alkaline phosphatase, and necrotizing enterocolitis. J Pediatr Surg. 2014; 49: 273-6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.11.037.
Blau J, Calo JM, Dozor D, Sutton M, Alpan G, La Gamma EF. Transfusion-related acute gut injury: Necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight neonates after packed red blood cell transfusion. J Pediatr. 2011; 158:403-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.09.015.
Sharma R, Hudak ML. A clinical perspective of necrotizing enterocolitis: Past, present, and future. Clin Perinatol. 2013; 40: 27-51. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2012.12.012.
Bhatia AM, Stoll BJ, Cismowski MJ, Hamrick SE. Cytokine levels in the preterm neonate with neonatal intestinal injury. Am J Perinatol. 2014; 31:489-96. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1353437.
Chan KYY, Leung FWL, Lam HS, Tam YH, To KF, Cheung HM, et al. Immunoregulatory protein profiles of necrotizing enterocolitis versus spontaneous intestinal perforation in preterm neonates. Plos one. 2012; 7:36977. Available from: https:/doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036977.
U.S. National Library Library of Medicine, National Institute of Health. Available from: https://www.nichd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/about/Documents/Nest_Protocol.pdf
Ng PC, Chan KYY, Poon TCW. Biomarkers for prediction and diagnosis of necrotizing enterocolitis. Clin Perinatol. 2013; 40:149-59. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2012.12.005.
Rusconi B, Good M, Warner BB. The Microbiome and biomarkers for necrotizing enterocolitis: Are we any closer to prediction? J Pediatr. 2017; 189:40-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.05.075.
Boskabadi H, Zakerhamidi M, Sadeghian MH, Avan A, Ghayour-Mobarhan M, Ferns GA. Nucleated red blood cells count as a prognostic biomarker in predicting the complications of asphyxia in neonates. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2017; 30:2551-6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2016.1256988.
Dulay AT, Buhimschi IA, Zhao G, Luo G, Abdel-Razeq S, Cackovic M, et al. Nucleated red blood cells are a direct response to mediators of inflammation in newborns with early-onset neonatal sepsis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 198:426. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.01.040.
Christensen RD, Lambert DK, Richards DS. Estimating the nucleated red blood cell “emergence time” in neonates. J Perinatol. 2014; 34:116-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2013.113.
Cremer M, Roll S, Gräf C, Weimann A, Bührer C, Dame C. Nucleated red blood cells as marker for an increased risk of unfavorable outcome and mortality in very low birth weight neonates. Early Hum Dev. 2015; 91:559-62. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.06.004.
Hermansen MC. Nucleated red blood cells in the fetus and newborn. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001; 84:211-5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/fn.84.3.f211.
Ravishankar V, Buhimschi CS, Booth CJ, Bhandari V, Norwitz E, Copel J, et al. Fetal nucleated red blood cells in a rat model of intrauterine growth restriction induced by hypoxia and nitric oxide synthase inhibition. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 196:482. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.12.020.
Wang K, Guozhong T, Zhen S, Sylvester KG. Recent potential noninvasive biomarkers in necrotizing enterocolitis. Gastroent Res Pract. 2019; 8413698. Available from: https://doi.org/10.115/2019/8413698.
Dina P, Muraskas JK. Hematologic changes in newborns with neonatal encephalopathy. Neoreviews. 2018; 19:29-33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1542/neo.19-1-e29.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Neonatal Encephalopathy and Neurologic Outcome, Second Edition. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014; 7:121.

Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Michaela O'Neill, Roia Katebian, Mollie Shutter, Amy Wozniak, Phillip J. DeChristopher, Loretto Glynn, Marc G. Weiss, Jonathan K. Muraskas

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.