Association of the rectovestibular fistula with MRKH Syndrome and the paradigm shift in the management in view of the future uterine transplant
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47338/jns.v9.551Keywords:
Rectovestibular fistula, Vaginal atresia, Cervicovaginal atresia, MRKH Syndrome, Vaginoplasty, Bowel vaginoplasty, Ecchietti vaginoplasty, Uterine transplantation, VCUA classification, ESHRE/ESGE classification, AFC classification, Krickenbeck classificationAbstract
Uterine transplantation in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) patients with absolute uterine function infertility have added a new dimension and paradigm shift in the management of females born with rectovestibular fistula coexisting with vaginal agenesis. The author reviewed the relevant literature of this rare association, the popular and practical classifications of genital malformations that the gynecologists use, the different vaginal reconstruction techniques, and try to know what shall serve best in this small cohort of these patients lest they wish to go for uterine transplantation in future.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Holschneider A, Hutson J, Peña A, Beket E, Chatterjee S, Coran A, et al. Preliminary report on the International Conference for the Development of Standards for the Treatment of Anorectal Malformations. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40:1521-6.
Sarin YK, Sinha A. Two orifices in the perineum of a girl with imperforate anus: possibility of uterovaginal agenesis associated with rectovestibular fistula. J Pediatr Surg. 2002; 37:1217-9.
Cook RCM. Anorectal malformations. In: Neonatal Surgery. 3rd edition. Edited by Lister J, Irving IM. London, England, Butterworth 1990, p. 547-70.
Galifer RB, Chavrier Y, Viala JS. Principles of the surgical treatment of cloacal malformation. Apropos of 3 cases. Chir Pediatr. 1985; 26:95-103.
Peña A. Anorectal malformations. Semin Pediatr Surg. 1995; 4:35-47.
Peña A. Imperforate anus and cloacal malformations. In: Pediatric Surgery. 3rd edition. Edited by Ashcraft KW. Saunders, Philadelphia, 2000. p. 473-92.
Choudhury SR, Khan NA, Debnath PR, Yadav PS, Shah S, Chadha R. Anorectal agenesis with rectovaginal fistula: a rare/regional variant. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2017; 22:79-82.
Torres R, Levitt MA, Tovilla JM, Rodriguez G, Peña A. Anorectal malformations and Down's syndrome. J Pediatr Surg. 1998; 33:194-7.
Bischoff A, Frischer J, Dickie BH, Peña A. Anorectal malformation without fistula: a defect with unique characteristics. Pediatr Surg Int. 2014; 30:763-6.
Sarin YK, Pathak D, Sengar M. Bowel vaginoplasty in children. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2006; 11:92-96.
Sinha A, Sarin YK. Mayer-Rokitansky Syndrome with imperforate anus - a unique association. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2001; 6:30-3.
Gross RE. Malformation of the anus and rectum. In: The surgery of infancy and childhood. Edited by Gross RE. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Company; 1953. p. 348–68.
Wakhlu A, Kureel SN, Tandon RK, Wakhlu AK. Long-term results of anterior sagittal anorectoplasty for the treatment of vestibular fistula. J Pediatr Surg. 2009; 44:1913-9.
De la Torre L, Cogley K, Calisto JL, Santos K, Ruiz A, Zornoza M. Vaginal agenesis and rectovestibular fistula. Experience utilizing distal ileum for the vaginal replacement in these patients, preserving the natural fecal reservoir. J Pediatr Surg. 2016; 51:1871-6.
Levitt MA, Stein DM, Peña A. Rectovestibular fistula with absent vagina: A unique anorectal malformation. J Pediatr Surg. 1998; 33:986-99.
Skerritt C, Vilanova Sánchez A, Lane VA, Wood RJ, Hewitt GD, Breech LL, et al. Menstrual, sexual, and obstetrical outcomes after vaginal replacement for vaginal atresia associated with anorectal malformation. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2017; 27:495-502.
Ahmed H, Almomani M, Strine AC, Reddy PP, Sheldon C, Frischer J, et al. Clinical urologic and urodynamic outcomes in patients with anorectal malformation and absent vagina after vaginal replacement [published online ahead of print, 2020 Feb 4]. J Pediatr Surg. 2020;S0022-3468(20)30093-2.
Levitt MA, Bischoff A, Breech L, Peña A. Rectovestibular fistula--rarely recognized associated gynecologic anomalies. J Pediatr Surg. 2009; 44:1261-7.
Cohn BD, Murphy DR. Imperforate anus with agenesis of the vagina. Ann Surg. 1956; 143:430-2.
Ein SH, Stephens CA. Vaginal construction in children with absent vagina and imperforate anus. J Pediatr Surg. 1971; 6:435-9.
Fujiwara Y, Oizumi T, Sasahara M, Kato E, Kakizaki G. A case of congenital imperforate anus and absent vagina with a functioning uterus. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1974; 113:283-9.
King SL, Ladda RL, Shochat SJ. Monozygotic twins concordant for tracheoesophageal fistula and discordant for the VATER association. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1977; 66:783-5.
Tolete-Velcek F, Hansbrough F, Kugaczewski J, Coren CV, Klotz DH, Price AF, et al. Utero vaginal malformations: a trap for the unsuspecting surgeon. J Pediatr Surg. 1989; 24:736-40.
Digray NC, Mengi Y, Goswamy HL, Thappa DR. Rectovaginoplasty for vaginal atresia with anorectal malformation. J Urol. 1999; 162:514-5.
Okoye BO, Parikh DH, Buick RG, Lander AD. Pyloric atresia: five new cases, a new association, and a review of the literature with guidelines. J Pediatr Surg. 2000; 35:1242-5.
Adejuyigbe O, Sowande OA, Olayinka OS, Fasubaa OB. Rectovestibular fistula with absent distal vagina in an adolescent Nigerian girl. J Pediatr Surg. 2002; 37:1479-80.
Günşar C, Genç A, Sencan A, Dağlar Z, Alparslan O, Mir E. MURCS association and rectovestibular fistula: case report of a patient treated with one-stage posterior sagittal anorectoplasty and sigmoid loop vaginoplasty. J Pediatr Surg. 2003; 38:262-4.
Tei E, Yamataka A, Segawa O, Kobayashi H, Lane GJ, Tobayama S, et al. Laparoscopically assisted anorectovaginoplasty for selected types of female anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg. 2003; 38:1770-4.
Deshpande AV, Sanghani HH, Sanghavi BV, Borwankar SS. Delayed presentation of vaginal agenesis with anorectal malformation—a unique problem. Ind J Ped Surg. 2003; 8:242-4.
Patankar JZ, Mali VP, Yashpal R, Neo GTH, Prabhakaran K. Anorectal malformation with congenital absence of vagina: a case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Surg Int. 2004; 20:295-7.
Patankar SP, Kalrao V, Patankar SS. Mayer-Rokitansky syndrome and anorectal malformation. Indian J Pediatr. 2004; 71:1133-5.
Banu T, Hannan MJ, Aziz MA, Hoque M, Laila K. Rectovestibular fistula with vaginal malformations. Pediatr Surg Int. 2006; 22:263-6.
Wester T, Läckgren G, Christofferson R, Rintala RJ. The congenital pouch colon can be used for vaginal reconstruction by longitudinal splitting. J Pediatr Surg. 2006; 41:e25–e28.
Komura M, Kanamori Y, Sugiyama M, Tomonaga T, Suzuki K, Hashizume K, et al. A female infant who had both complete VACTERL association and MURCS association: report of a case. Surg Today. 2007; 37:878-80.
Matignas ALA, Delos Reyes RH. Rectovestibular fistula as neovagina in congenital cervico-vaginal agenesis associated with imperforate anus. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008; 34:428-35.
Chatterjee SK. Rare/regional variants. In: Anorectal malformations in children. Edited by Holschneider AM, Hutson JM. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer; 2008.p. 251-62.
Wang S, Lang JH, Zhu L. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome with rectovestibular fistula and imperforate anus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010; 153:77-80.
Mane SB, Shastri P, Dhende NP, Obaidah A, Acharya H, Reddy S, et al. Our 10-year experience of variable Müllerian anomalies and its management. Pediatr Surg Int. 2010; 26:795-800.
Wester T, Tovar JA, Rintala RJ. Vaginal agenesis or distal vaginal atresia associated with anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg. 2012; 47:571-6.
Yamataka A, Goto S, Kato Y, Koga H, Lane GJ, Okazaki T. Fecal and urinary continence after scope-assisted anorectovaginoplasty for female anorectal malformation. Pediatr Surg Int. 2012; 28:907-12.
Jessel RH, Laufer MR. Management of lower vaginal agenesis in a patient with unicornuate uterus. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013; 26:e21–e23.
de Blaauw I, Midrio P, Breech L, Bischoff A, Dickie B, Versteegh HP, et al. Treatment of adults with unrecognized or inadequately repaired anorectal malformations: 17 cases of rectovestibular and rectoperineal fistulas. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013; 26:156-60.
Kisku S, Barla RK, Sen S, Karl S, Mathai J, Varghese L. Rectovestibular fistula with vaginal atresia: our experience and a proposed course of management. Pediatr Surg Int. 2014; 30:6333-9.
Kapczuk K, Friebe Z, Iwaniec K, Kędzia W. Creation of a neovagina in a patient with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome and previously corrected rectovestibular fistula concomitant with imperforate anus. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015; 28:e17–9.
Pandya KA, Koga H, Okawada M, Coran AG, Yamataka A, Teitelbaum DH. Vaginal anomalies and atresia associated with imperforate anus: diagnosis and surgical management. J Pediatr Surg. 2015; 50:431-7.
Teo XL, Narasimhan KL, Chua JH. Müllerian agenesis in the presence of anorectal malformations in female newborns: a diagnostic challenge. Singapore Med J. 2015; 56:e82–e84.
Gupta R, Gupta A, Gupta A, Singh A. Mayer- Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome with Imperforate Anus: A Rare Association and an Innovative Surgical Management. IJSS Case Rep Reviews. 2016; 2:1-3.
Bjørsum-Meyer T, Herlin M, Qvist N, Petersen MB. Vertebral defect, anal atresia, cardiac defect, tracheoesophageal fistula/esophageal atresia, renal defect, and limb defect association with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome in co-occurrence: two case reports and a review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2016; 10:374.
Tiwari C, Shah H, Bothra J, Sandlas G. Congenital rectovaginal fistula with anorectal agenesis: A rare anorectal malformation. Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2017; 4:138-40.
Kölle A, Taran FA, Rall K, Schöller D, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY. Neovagina creation methods and their potential impact on subsequent uterus transplantation: a review. BJOG. 2019; 126:1328-35.
Mayer CA. [About doubling of the uterus and its types, along with remarks about rabbits and wolf throats] J Chir Augen. 1829; 13:525-64. [Article in German]
Rokitansky KF. [About the so-called doubling of the uterus]. Med Jahrb Österr Staat. 1838; 26:39-77. [Article in German]
Kuester H. [Rudimentary solid bipartite uterus with solid vagina]. Z Geburtshilfe Gynäkol. 1910; 67;692-718. [Article in Latin]
Hauser GA, Schreiner WE. [Das Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Syndrome]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1961; 91:381-4. [Article in German]
Schmid-Tannwald I, Hauser GA. [Atypical forms of the Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster syndrome]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1977; 37:386-92. [Article in German]
Duncan PA, Shapiro LR, Stangel JJ, Klein RM, Addonizio JC. The MURCS association: Müllerian duct aplasia, renal aplasia, and cervicothoracic somite dysplasia. J Pediatr. 1979; 95:399-402.
Liszewska-Kapłon M, Strózik M, Kotarski Ł, Bagłaj M, Hirnle L. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome as an interdisciplinary problem. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2020; 29:505-11.
Oppelt P, Renner SP, Kellermann A, Brucker S, Hauser GA, Ludwig KS, et al. Clinical aspects of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: recommendations for clinical diagnosis and staging. Hum Reprod. 2006; 21:792-7.
Deng S, He Y, Chen N, Zhu L. Spectrum of type I and type II syndromes and associated malformations in Chinese patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: A retrospective analysis of 274 cases. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019; 32:284-7.
Oppelt P, Renner SP, Brucker S, Strissel PL, Strick R, Oppelt PG, et al. The VCUAM (Vagina Cervix Uterus Adnex-associated Malformation) classification: a new classification for genital malformations. Fertil Steril. 2005; 84:1493-7.
Kisku S, Verghese L, Kekre A, Sen S, Karl S, Mathai J, et al. Bowel vaginoplasty in children and young women: an institutional experience with 55 patients. Int Urogynecol J. 2015; 26:1441-8.
Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, et al. The ESHRE/ ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28:2032-44.
Buttram VC Jr, Gomel V, Siegler A, DeCherney A, Gibbons W, March C. American Fertility Society. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion secondary due to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1988; 49:944-55.
Acién P, Acién M, Sánchez-Ferrer M. Complex malformations of the female genital tract. New types and revision of classification. Hum Reprod. 2004; 19:2377-84.
Callens N, De Cuypere G, De Sutter P, Monstrey S, Weyers S, Hoebeke P, et al. An update on surgical and non-surgical treatments for vaginal hypoplasia. Hum Reprod Update. 2014; 20:775-801.
Committee on Adolescent Health Care. ACOG Committee opinion No. 728: Müllerian agenesis: Diagnosis, management, and treatment. Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 131:e35–e42.
Cheikhelard A, Bidet M, Baptiste A, Viaud M, Fagot C, Khen-Dunlop N, et al. Surgery is not superior to dilation for the management of vaginal agenesis in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: A multicenter comparative observational study in 131 patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 219:281.e1-281.e9.
Adeyemi-Fowode OA, Dietrich JE. Assessing the experience of vaginal dilator use and potential barriers to ongoing use among a focus group of women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017; 30:491-4.
Liszewska-Kapłon M, Strózik M, Kotarski Ł, Bagłaj M, Hirnle L. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome as an interdisciplinary problem. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2020; 29:505-11.
Frank RT. The formation of an artificial vagina without operation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1938; 35:1053-5.
Ingram JM. The bicycle seat stool in the treatment of vaginal agenesis and stenosis: A preliminary report. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981; 140:867-73.
Williams JK, Lake M, Ingram JM. The bicycle seat stool in the treatment of vaginal agenesis and stenosis. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1985; 14:147-50.
McQuillan SK, Grover SR. Dilation and surgical management in vaginal agenesis: A systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2014; 25:299-311.
Edmonds DK, Rose GL, Lipton MG, Quek J. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: A review of 245 consecutive cases managed by a multidisciplinary approach with vaginal dilators. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97:686-90.
Ketheeswaran A, Morrisey J, Abbott J, Bennett M, Dudley J, Deans R. Intensive vaginal dilation using adjuvant treatments in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: Retrospective cohort study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018; 58:108-13.
Baldwin JF. The formation of an artificial vagina by intestinal transplantation. Ann Surg. 1904; 40:398-403.
Lima M, Ruggeri G, Randi B, Domini M, Gargano T, Pergola EL, et al. Vaginal replacement in the pediatric age group: a 34-year experience of intestinal vaginoplasty in children and young girls. J Pediatr Surg. 2010; 45:2087-91.
Hensle TW, Reiley EA. Vaginal replacement in children and young adults. J Urol. 1998; 159:1035-38.
Georgas K, Belgrano V, Andréasson M, Elander A, Selvaggi G. Bowel vaginoplasty: A systematic review. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2018; 52:265-73.
Özkan Ö, Özkan Ö, Çinpolat A, Dogan NU, Bektas U, Doley K, et al. Vaginal reconstruction with the modified rectosigmoid colon: Surgical technique, long-term results and sexual outcomes. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2018; 52:210-6.
van der Sluis WB, Bouman MB, Meijerink WJHJ, Elfering L, Mullender MG, de Boer NKH, et al. Diversion neovaginitis after sigmoid vaginoplasty: Endoscopic and clinical characteristics. Fertil Steril. 2016; 105:834.e1.-839.e1.
Djordjevic ML, Stanojevic DS, Bizic MR. Rectosigmoid vaginoplasty: clinical experience and outcomes in 86 cases. J Sex Med. 2011; 8:3487-94.
Zhang M, Li S, Huang X, Du H, Wang C, Zhang L, et al. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic vaginoplasty hybrid transperineal approach using a sigmoid colon segment: Initial twenty-five cases. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016; 48:1401-6.
Boztosun A, Olgan S. Robotic sigmoid vaginoplasty in an adolescent girl with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016; 22:e32-e35.
Gauthier T, Lavoue V, Piver P, Aubard Y, Ayoubi JM, Garbin O, et al. Which neovagina reconstruction procedure for women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome in the uterus transplantation era? Editorial from the French Uterus Transplantation Committee (CETUF) of CNGOF. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018; 47:175-6.
Vecchietti G. [Neovagina in the syndrome of in Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser]. Attualita Obstet Ginecol. 1965; 11:131-47. [Article in Italian]
Vecchietti G. [The neo-vagina in Rokitansky syndrome-Küster-Hauser]. Rev Med Suisse Romande. 1979; 99:593. [Article in French]
Fedele L, Bianchi S, Frontino G, Fontana E, Restelli E, Bruni V. The laparoscopic Vecchietti’s modified technique in Rokitansky syndrome: anatomic, functional, and sexual long-term results. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 198:377.e1-377.e6.
Borruto F, Camoglio FS, Zampieri N, Fedele L. The laparoscopic Vecchietti technique for vaginal agenesis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007; 98:15-9.
Brucker SY, Gegusch M, Zubke W, Rall K, Gauwerky JF, Wallwiener D. Neovagina creation in vaginal agenesis: Development of a new laparoscopic Vecchietti-based procedure and optimized instruments in a prospective comparative interventional study in 101 patients. Fertil Steril. 2008 ;90:1940-52.
Rall K, Schickner MC, Barresi G, Schonfisch B, Wallwiener M, Wallwiener CW, et al. Laparoscopically assisted neovaginoplasty in vaginal agenesis: A long-term outcome study in 240 patients. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2014; 27:379-85.
McIndoe AH, Bannister JB. An operation for the cure of congenital absence of the vagina. J Obstet Gynecol Brit Emp. 1938; 45:490-4.
McIndoe A. The treatment of congenital absence and obliterative conditions of the vagina. Br J Plast Surg. 1950; 2:254-67.
Cali RW, Pratt JH. Congenital absence of the vagina. Long-term results of vaginal reconstruction in 175 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1968; 100:752-63.
Han SE, Go JY, Choi DS, Seo GH, Lim SY. Experience with specially designed pored polyacetal mold dressing method used in McIndoe-style vaginoplasty. J Pediatr Urol. 2017; 13:621.e1-e621.e6.
McQuillan SK, Grover SR. Dilation and surgical management in vaginal agenesis: A systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2014; 25:299-311.
Hopkins MP, Morley GW. Squamous cell carcinoma of the neovagina. Obstet Gynecol. 1987; 69:525-7.
Baltzer J, Zander J. Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the neovagina. Gynecol Oncol 1989; 35:99-103.
Idrees MT, Deligdisch L, Altchek A. Squamous papilloma with hyperpigmentation in the skin graft of the neovagina in Rokitansky syndrome: Literature review of benign and malignant lesions of the neovagina. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2009; 22:e148–e155.
Williams EA. Congenital absence of the vagina; a simple operation for its relief. J Obstet Gynecol Commonw. 1964; 71:511–4.
Creatsas G, Deligeoroglou E, Makrakis E, Kontoravdis A, Papadimitriou L. Creation of a neovagina following Williams vaginoplasty and the Creatsas modification in 111 patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2001; 76:1036–40.
Sheares BH. Congenital atresia of the vagina—a technique for tunneling the space between the bladder and rectum and construction of a new vagina by a modified Wharton-technique. J Obstet Gynecol Br Emp. 1960; 67:24-31.
Kuessel L, Wenzl R, Marschalek ML, Slavka G, Doerfler D, Husslein H. Using the Wharton-Sheares-George method to create a neovagina in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: a step-by-step video tutorial. Fertil Steril. 2016; 106:e20-e21.
Kriplani A, Karthik SD, Kriplani I, Kachhawa G. Laparoscopic peritoneal vaginoplasty for Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome: an experience at a tertiary care center. J Gynecol Surg. 2018; 34:63-7.
Bianchi S, Frontino G, Ciappina N, Restelli E, Fedele L. Creation of a neovagina in Rokitansky syndrome: comparison between two laparoscopic techniques. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95:1098-100.e1-3.
Fedele L, Frontino G, Restelli E, Ciappina N, Motta F, Bianchi S. Creation of a neovagina by Davydov’s laparoscopic modified technique in patients with Rokitansky syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 202:33.e1-e6.
Ding JX, Chen LM, Zhang XY, Zhang Y, Hua KQ. Sexual and functional outcomes of vaginoplasty using acellular porcine small intestinal submucosa graft or laparoscopic peritoneal vaginoplasty: a comparative study. Hum Reprod. 2015; 30:581-9.
Zhang X, Ding Y, Hua K, Liu S, Jia N. Combined Laparoscopic and Vaginal Cervicovaginal Reconstruction Using Acellular Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa Graft in a Patient with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome (U5aC4V4). J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019; 26:396-7.
Ozkan O, Akar ME, Ozkan O, Erdogan O, Hadimioglu N, Yilmaz M, et al. Preliminary results of the first human uterus transplantation from a multiorgan donor. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99:470–6.
Brännström M, Dahm-Kähler P. Uterus transplantation and fertility preservation. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019; 55:109-16.
Flyckt R, Falcone T, Eghtesad B, Fung J, Tzakis A. Uterus transplantation: medical considerations. Curr Transpl Rep. 2016; 3:380-4.
Fageeh WRH, Jabbad H, Marzouki A. Transplantation of the human uterus. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002; 76:245–51.
Erman A, Ozkan O, Aydinuraz B, Dirican K, Cincik M, Mendilcioglu I, et al. Clinical pregnancy after uterus transplantation. Fertil Steril. 2013; 100:1358-63.
Brännström M, Diaz-Garcia C, Hanafy A, Olausson M, Tzakis A. Uterus transplantation: animal research and human possibilities. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97:1269-76.
Brännström M, Johannesson L, Dahm-Kahler P, Enskog A, Molne J, Kvarnstrom N, et al. First clinical uterus transplantation trial: a six month report. Fertil Steril. 2014; 101:1228-36.
Johannesson L, Jarvholm S. Uterus transplantation: current progress and future prospects. Int J Womens Health. 2016; 8:43-51.
Kisu I, Liu Y, Chen G, Song MJ, Chang CY, Koon TH, et al. Current progress in uterus transplantation research in Asia. J Clin Med. 2019; 8:245.
Daolio J, Palomba S, Paganelli S, Falbo A, Aguzzoli L Uterine transplantation and IVF for congenital or acquired uterine factor infertility: A systematic review of safety and efficacy outcomes in the first 52 recipients. PLoS ONE. 2020; 15:e0232323.
Gautheir T, Piver P, Pichon N, Bibes R, Guillaudeau A, Piccardo A, et al. Uterus retrieval process from brain dead donors. Fertil Steril. 2014; 102:476-82.
Johannesson L, Kvarnström N, Mölne J, Dahm-Kähler P, Enskog A, Diaz-Garcia C, et al. Uterus transplantation trial: 1-year outcome. Fertil Steril. 2015; 103:199-204.
Flyckt R, Davis A, Farrell R, Zimberg S, Tzakis A, Falcone T. Uterine Transplantation: Surgical Innovation in the Treatment of Uterine Factor Infertility. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018; 40:86-93.
Puntambekar S, Telang M, Kulkarni P, Jadhav S, Sathe R, Warty N, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted uterus retrieval from live organ donors for uterine transplant. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018; 25:571-2.
Georgopapadakos N, Manoli A, Passia G, Skandalakis PN, Filippou D. Uterus transplantation as a therapy method in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome. Cureus. 2019; 11:e6333.
Ejzenberg D, Andraus W, Baratelli Carelli Mendes LR, Ducatti L, Song A, Tanigawa R, et al. Livebirth after uterus transplantation from a deceased donor in a recipient with uterine infertility. Lancet. 2019; 392:2697-704.
Pluta D, Lemm M, Franik G, Kowalcyzk K, Blucakz L, Tekieli-Balon A, et al. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome - case studies, methods of treatment and the future prospects of human uterus transplantation. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020; 24:549-63.
Brännström M, Johannesson L, Bokström H, Kvarnström N, Mölne J, Dahm-Kähle P, et al. Livebirth after uterus transplantation. Lancet. 2015; 385:607-16.

Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Yogesh Kumar Sarin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.