The Role of Law in Regulating Experimental Surgical Techniques

Authors

  • Umesh Chougule
  • Sukhvinder Singh Dari
  • Mayur Nagvekar
  • Ravindra S. Patil
  • Shankar Lal Soni

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.1663

Keywords:

Experimental Surgery, Regulatory Agencies, Informed Consent, Medical Malpractice, Surgical Techniques, Approval Process, Surgical Innovation, Regulatory Compliance, Consent Protocols, Surgical Trials, Experimental Procedures

Abstract

The use of experimental surgery methods has a big impact on both the progress of medical treatments and the chances of people getting better results. Using new medical technology that hasn't been tried on people brings up a lot of issues related to patient safety, ethics, and the law. Laws need to be in charge of experimental surgery so that these new methods can be used in a way that is moral, safe, and cost-effective. This paper looks into how new surgery methods are handled with an eye towards the rules, morals, and legal problems that come up. The study looks into how medical rules, such as those made by the FDA and EMA, affect how new surgery tools and methods are accepted. The paper also talks about how doctors have a social duty to make sure patients give their full consent and protect their freedom, especially when it comes to novel treatments. It talks about the legal issues that have come up because of mistakes doctors made and injuries patients got during recent surgeries. It also talks about how important events in the past have changed the laws that judges have to follow. Case law, social problems, and current legal systems can all help us understand how important it is for the law to protect patient rights while also allowing medical progress. The last point makes the case for legal rules that are easy to change in order to support moral medical progress while protecting public health and maintaining faith in the healthcare system. This can help with ethical development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Andreoletti Mattia, Teira David. Rules versus Standards: What Are the Costs of Epistemic Norms in Drug Regulation? Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2019;44:1093–1115.

Sacks Chana A, Avorn Jerry, Kesselheim Aaron S. The Failure of Solanezumab — How the FDA Saved Taxpayers Billions. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;376:1706–1708.

K.I. Paraskevas et al. Why randomized controlled trials do not always reflect reality J Vasc Surg (2019)

J. He, S. L. Baxter, J. Xu, J. Xu, X. Zhou, and K. Zhang, ‘‘The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine,’’ Nature Med., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 30–36, Jan. 2019.

C. Zhang and Y. Lu, ‘‘Study on artificial intelligence: The state of the art and future prospects,’’ J. Ind. Inf. Integr., vol. 23, Sep. 2021, Art. no. 100224.

A. Rawal, J. McCoy, D. B. Rawat, B. M. Sadler, and R. S. Amant, ‘‘Recent advances in trustworthy explainable artificial intelligence: Status, challenges, and perspectives,’’ IEEE Trans. Artif. Intell., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 852–866, Dec. 2022.

Farrokhyar Forough, Karanicolas Paul J, Thoma Achilleas, Simunovic Marko, Bhandari Mohit, Devereaux PJ, Anvari Mehran, Adili Anthony. Randomized Controlled Trials of Surgical Interventions. Annals of Surgery. 2010;251:409–416.

Blencowe NS, Mills N, Cook JA, Donovan JL, Rogers CA, Whiting P, Blazeby JM. Standardizing and monitoring the delivery of surgical interventions in randomized clinical trials. British Journal of Surgery. 2016;103:1377–1384.

Wartolowska Karolina, Collins Gary S, Hopewell Sally, Judge Andrew, Dean Benjamin JF, Rombach Ines, Beard David J, Carr Andrew J. Feasibility of surgical randomised controlled trials with a placebo arm: a systematic review. British Medical Journal Open. 2016;6:e010194.

Savulescu Julian, Wartolowska Karolina, Carr Andy. Randomised placebo-controlled trials of surgery: ethical analysis and guidelines. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2016;42:776–783.

Pereira Tiago V, Ralph I, Horwitz, John PA Ioannidis. Empirical evaluation of very large treatment effects of medical interventions. JAMA. 2012;308:1676–1684.

Hayes Michael J, Kaestner Victoria, Mailankody Sham, Prasad Vinay. Most medical practices are not parachutes: a citation analysis of practices felt by biomedical authors to be analogous to parachutes. CMAJ Open. 2018;6:E31–E38.

B. Speich Adequate reporting of the sample size calculation in surgical randomized controlled trials Surgery (2020)

C. Hegde, ‘‘Anomaly detection in time series data using data-centric AI,’’ in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Electron., Comput. Commun. Technol. (CONECCT), Jul. 2022, pp. 1–6.

M. Batty, ‘‘Planning data,’’ Environ. Planning B, Urban Anal. City Sci., vol. 49, pp. 1588–1592, Jan. 2022.

C. Ré, F. Niu, P. Gudipati, and C. Srisuwananukorn, ‘‘Overton: A data system for monitoring and improving machine-learned products,’’ in Proc. 10th Conf. Innov. Data Syst. Res., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Jan. 2020.

Holzinger A. Human-Computer Interaction and Knowledge Discovery (HCI-KDD): what is the benefit of bringing those two fields to work together? In: A Cuzzocrea, C Kittl, DE Simos, et al., eds. Multidisciplinary Research and Practice for Information Systems, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science LNCS 8127. Heidelberg, Berlin, New York: Springer; 2013: 319-328.

Kircher K, Larsson A, Hultgren JA. Tactical driving behavior with different levels of automation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2014; 15(1): 158-167.

Sharkey N, Sharkey A. Robotic surgery: on the cutting edge of ethics. Computertomographie. 2013; 46(1): 56-64.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-10

How to Cite

1.
Chougule U, Singh Dari S, Nagvekar M, S. Patil R, Lal Soni S. The Role of Law in Regulating Experimental Surgical Techniques. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Feb.10 [cited 2025Sep.21];14(2S):107-16. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/1663

Most read articles by the same author(s)