Inventory of instruments, medical devices, equipment and building facilities containing mercury in health facilities

Authors

  • José Iván Villavicencio-Soledispa
  • Camila Valentina Ortiz-Salazar
  • Jennifer Paola Freire-Timbela
  • Mayra Lisseth Toaquiza-Quinapallo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.1860

Keywords:

Sphygmomanometer, Mercury switches, dental amalgams, Thermostat probe, Pressure gauge.

Abstract

The inventory of instruments, medical devices, equipment and building facilities containing mercury in health facilities was carried out on July 11, 2023 at the Riobamba Private Hospital, covering areas such as Hospitalization, Dentistry and Various Services.

Devices containing mercury were identified, consisting of: 187 thermometers (oral, rectal and pediatric) with a total of 336.6 grams distributed in the hospital's rooms and warehouse, 1 laboratory thermometer with 4.4 grams in the clinical laboratory, 1 sphygmomanometer/tensiometer with 95 grams in the delivery room, and 1 gastrointestinal tube with 907 grams in the gastroenterology area.

As for building equipment and facilities that contain mercury, they include: 2 in boiler indicator controls with 4,445.28 grams of mercury in the kitchen; 3 flow meters with a total of 15,000 grams distributed between the machine room and traumatology, 46 flame sensors with 138 grams, 30 pressure switches and 30 temperature switches with 345 and 165 grams of mercury, 22 inclined mercury switches with a total of 785.4 grams and 502 compact fluorescent lamps and 388 linear ones distributed in all hospital services.

The waste inventory includes 187 thermometers with 1,870 grams of mercury, 1 blood pressure monitor with 95 grams, and a gastrointestinal tube with 907 grams. No esophageal dilators with mercury are reported. Dental amalgam waste contains 0.01 micrograms of mercury, with no current waste.

There are 893 luminaires, lamps and fluorescent tubes with 455,430 grams of mercury. No waste from mercury switches is reported. 462 grams of liquid mercury is recorded in dentistry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

González, A. (2024, 9 18). Institutional Repository of the Autonomous University of the State of Mexico . Retrieved from http://ri.uaemex.mx/handle/20.500.11799/70682

WHO. (2024, 09, 18). World Health Organization . Retrieved from Mercury and Health: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mercury-and-health

Goss, J. R. (2022). Health Expenditure Data, Analysis and Policy Relevance in Australia, 1967 to 2020. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042143

UNEP. (2020). Mercury Inventory Toolkit. 2:1–7. https://www.unep.org/explore-topics/chemicals-waste/what-we-do/mercury/mercury-inventory-toolkit%0Ahttps://www.unenvironment.org/

Zordilla, Z. D. L. T. (2018). A descriptive study identifying gaps in the effective implementation of mercury-containing device phase-out in selected doh-retained hospitals. Acta Medica Philippina, 52(5), 429–437. https://doi.org/10.47895/AMP.V52I5.340

Lee, J., Kim, H., Park, S., & Choi, J. (2020). Levels of mercury exposure in healthcare workers handling dental amalgam. Journal of Environmental Health, 83(2), 123-129. doi:10.1080/00161132.2019.1698452

Hu, X., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., & Liu, X. (2016). Mercury exposure among dental health workers in China: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A: Environmental Science Engineering, 51(11), 835-841. doi:10.1080/10673179.2016.1141156

Al-Saleh, M. A., Al-Zahrani, M. S., & Al-Olayan, A. M. (2015). Mercury exposure in dental health workers in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dental Journal, 27(1), 19-24.

Peshin SS, Halder N, Jathikarta C, Gupta YK. Environmental monitoring and evaluation. 2018; 187(3):145. doi:10.1007/s10661-015-4311-2.

Álvarez-Chávez CR, Federico-Pérez RA, Gómez-Álvarez A, Velázquez-Contreras LE, Pérez-Ríos R. Environmental monitoring and evaluation. 2020; 186(9):5393-400. doi:10.1007/s10661-014-3787-5.

Choi-Lao AT, Corte G, Dowd G, Lao RC. The science of the total environment. 2021; 11(3):287-92. doi:10.1016/0048-9697(79)90079-2.

Prokopowicz A, Mniszek W. Environmental monitoring and assessment. 2019; 104(1-3):147-54. DOI:10.1007/S10661-005-1606-8.

Li P, Yang Y, Xiong W. Research on biological trace elements. 2020; 168(2):330-4. doi:10.1007/s12011-015-0391-7.

Thigpen J, Sexson WR. Journal of Perinatology: Official journal of the California Perinatal Association. 2018 March-April; 17(2):140-2.

Picazo J.E., Sánchez J.M., Fernandez V., Chemical Aspects of Mercurials, Revista Actualidad Dermatológica, Vol. 33, October 2022.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-28

How to Cite

1.
Villavicencio-Soledispa JI, Ortiz-Salazar CV, Freire-Timbela JP, Toaquiza-Quinapallo ML. Inventory of instruments, medical devices, equipment and building facilities containing mercury in health facilities. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Feb.28 [cited 2025Sep.20];14(4S):670-4. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/1860

Most read articles by the same author(s)