Prevalence of Morphological Variations in The Occlusal Aspect of Mandibular Second Premolar

Authors

  • Lekha D
  • Vikhashini P.M

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.2172

Keywords:

Mandibular second premolar, occlusal surface, tooth, groove pattern

Abstract

Background: Mandibular second premolar is the  successor of the deciduous mandibular second molar and is the fifth tooth from the midline. It often occurs in two morphological forms, two cusps and tricuspidata three cusps. Premolars  are  divided  into 2  types namely bicuspid  and tricuspid  premolars.  There are three variant occlusal groove patterns. Y shape pattern is associated with three cusps types and U shape and H shape patterns are associated with two cusps types.

Aim: To determine the prevalence of morphological variations in the occlusal aspect of mandibular second premolar.

Materials and methods: Cross sectional study was carried  among 100 participants belonging to the Chennai population. Participants with fully erupted healthy mandibular second premolar on both the left and right side were included in the study. Dat was collected and tabulated in microsoft excel. Data was then exported to SPSS for appropriate statistical analysis.

Results: The most predominant pattern was Y followed by H. On the left mandibular second premolar Y - pattern was predominant, whereas on the right side it was the H pattern.

Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study we can conclude that Y pattern is the most common occlusal groove pattern in mandibular second premolar among Chennai population. Y pattern is most common on the right side and H among the left side. However the results are not in consensus with other population groups. This has opened the eye for a need to understand the interethnic and inter region variability of the occlusal morphology of mandibular second premolar.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Sunil S, Gopakumar D, Sunil S, et al. Prevalence of the two variants of mandibular second premolars in Kerala population. Int J Odontostomat 2012; 6: 375–377.

Bicakci AA, Doruk C, Babacan H. Late development of a mandibular second premolar. Korean J Orthod 2012; 42: 94–98.

Moreno Uribe LM, Miller SF. Genetics of the dentofacial variation in human malocclusion. Orthod Craniofac Res 2015; 18 Suppl 1: 91–99.

Medio M, Popelut A, De La Dure Molla M. Management of mandibular second premolar agenesis. Journal of Dentofacial Anomalies and Orthodontics 2015; 18: 105.

Ali MAH, Niazi M, Saqib S, et al. Frequency of different groove patterns seen on the occlusal surface of mandibular second premolars. Journal of Islamabad Medical & Dental College 2019; 8: 84–87.

Yoo H-I, Park H-Y, Kim S-H. Occlusal surface analysis of mandibular premolars in koreans. Korean Journal of Physical Anthropology 2015; 28: 145–153.

Management of permanent mandibular second premolar with extraneous canals: An endodontic challenge. J Data Sci 2018; 6: 85–86.

Khan DB, Khan F, Khan H, et al. Frequency of bicuspid and tricuspid form of mandibular second premolar at Khyber College of Dentistry Peshawar. J Med Sci 2013; 21: 118–120.

Gunduz K, Avsever H, Orhan K, et al. A multi-centre evaluation of multiple supernumerary premolar prevalence. Aust Orthod J 2015; 31: 149–156.

Ahmed A, Iqbal N, Baig MZ, et al. Frequency of type traits of mandibular second premolars-a study. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal; 36, http://search.proquest.com/openview/e96ea9a62c06d27ddf610ac40c62b253/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=616533 (2016).

Loh HS. Coronal morphology of the mandibular second premolar in the Singaporean Chinese. Aust Dent J 1993; 38: 283–286.

Syam S, Uma Maheswari TN. Assessment of Morphological Variations in Condyle Between Males and Females Using Orthopantomogram: A Cross-Sectional Study. Biomedicine. 2019;39(1):154-158.

Jain S, Hegde S, Kalra S, Nagi R, Goyal P, Shukla S. Digitized Radiovisiographic Analysis of Dental Pulp of Permanent Mandibular First Molar and Second Premolar for Age Estimation Using Tooth Coronal Index Method. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2018;30(4):392-397.

Jeevitha M, Jayakeerthana S, Maragathavalli G. Assessment of Periodontal Status in Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2020;10(4):1032-1036.

Ganesh C, Ganasundram N, Maragathavalli G, Uma Maheswari TN. Prevalence of Dental Caries in Different Grades of Dental Fluorosis in Salem and Dharmapuri Districts Aged 15 to 17 Years. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2013;25(4):251-255.

Sangeetha GS, Gnanasundaram N, Maragathavalli G. Prevalence and Different Varieties of Type V Lip Prints. Anil Aggrawal’s Internet Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology. 2013;14(1):1-5.

Praveena NM, Maragathavalli G. Osteosarcoma of Maxilla: A Rare Case Report. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2012;24(3):239-241.

Mishra SR, Sathyakumar P, Maragathavalli G, Rastogi V. Facial Plexiform Neurofibroma in a 13-Year-Old Girl with Neurofibromatosis-1. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2013;17(1):132-135.

Ranganathan K, Kavitha R, Sawant S, et al. Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Case-Control Study in Chennai, South India. J Oral Pathol Med. 2004;33(5):274-277.

Iyer VH, Indira R, Ramachandran S, et al. Anatomical variations of mandibular premolars in Chennai population. Indian J Dent Res 2006; 17: 7–10.

Acharya S, Kumar Mandal P, Ghosh C. Bilateral molariform mandibular second premolars. Case Rep Dent 2015; 2015: 809463.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-15

How to Cite

1.
D L, P.M V. Prevalence of Morphological Variations in The Occlusal Aspect of Mandibular Second Premolar. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Mar.15 [cited 2025Sep.21];14(6S):12-6. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/2172