A Comparative Analysis of Financial Performance: Family-Owned vs. Non-Family Governed Companies in the NSE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.2299Keywords:
Financial Performer, Family Owned Business, Govt Companies, National Stock ExchangeAbstract
This study presents a comparative analysis of the financial performance of family-owned and non-family governed companies listed on the National Stock Exchange (NSE) of India. Family-owned businesses, characterized by significant family involvement in management and ownership, often exhibit unique governance structures and strategic orientations compared to their non-family counterparts. This research aims to identify whether these distinctions translate into measurable differences in financial performance. Utilizing a dataset comprising various financial metrics over a period of five years, the study employs statistical methods to analyze profitability, liquidity, leverage, and market valuation indicators. The analysis highlights key performance differentials, assessing how family ownership influences financial outcomes. Preliminary findings suggest that family-owned firms may benefit from long-term strategic planning and robust internal controls, yet could face challenges related to nepotism and succession planning. Conversely, non-family governed firms might exhibit higher levels of professional management and diversified risk-taking. This research contributes to the broader understanding of corporate governance's impact on financial performance, offering valuable insights for investors, policymakers, and business leaders. The study underscores the need for tailored governance frameworks that enhance performance while acknowledging the inherent strengths and weaknesses of both family-owned and non-family governed firms. The findings advocate for balanced governance practices that optimize financial outcomes in diverse ownership structures.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Akula, S. C., Singh, P., Farhan, M., Kumar, P., Cheema, G. S., Rehman, M., Sharma, A., & Kumar, P. (2024). Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Chatbot-Based Workshop for Experiential Learning and Proposing Applications. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2024(109), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2024.109.003
Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301-1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00567
Andres, C. (2008). Large shareholders and firm performance—An empirical examination of founding-family ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(4), 431-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.05.003
Barontini, R., & Caprio, L. (2006). The effect of family control on firm value and performance: Evidence from Continental Europe. European Financial Management, 12(5), 689-723. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2006.00273.x
Bertrand, M., Mehta, P., & Mullainathan, S. (2002). Ferreting out tunneling: An application to Indian business groups. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 121-148. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302753399463
Bhat Ali Basit, Gupta Nitin Dr, R. M. (2022). To Study the Effect of Corporate Governance on the Performance of Indian Listed Firms : A Comparative Panel Data Analysis. 20(August), 9268–9282. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2022.20.10.NQ55908
Chittoor, R., & Das, R. (2007). Professionalization of management and succession performance—A vital linkage. Family Business Review, 20(1), 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00083.x
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. P. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00067-2
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. G. (2000). Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. Journal of Finance, 55(2), 867-891. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00229
Mazzola, P., Marchisio, G., & Astrachan, J. (2008). Strategic planning in family business: A powerful development tool for the next generation. Family Business Review, 21(3), 239-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865080210030104
Muzzamil, R. (2021). Impact of Corporatr Governance on the Financial Reporting Quality in the Nigerian Banking Industry. Johuns.Net, 48(5). https://johuns.net/index.php/publishing/22.pdf
Nagpal, R., Singh, P., Angra, P. K., Cheema, G. S., & Rehman, M. (2024). Wearable Computing: Canonical Correlation Analysis (CFA) Statistical Method to Validate the Measurement Models Smart Ergonomic Shoes. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 12(17s), 404–408.
Rehman, M., Dhiman, B., Kumar, R., & Cheema, G. S. (2023). Exploring the Impact of Personality Traits on Investment Decisions of Immigrated Global Investors with Focus on Moderating Risk Appetite : A SEM Approach. 8984(August), 95–110.
Rehman, M., & Dhiman, D. B. (2022). To Study the Impact on the Perception of Banking Customers toward E-Banking (A Case Study of Jk Bank Customers). Journal of Corporate Finance Management and Banking System, 26, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.55529/jcfmbs.26.10.20
Sarkar, J., & Sarkar, S. (2000). Large shareholder activism in corporate governance in developing countries: Evidence from India. International Review of Finance, 1(3), 161-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2443.00010
Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control, and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
