Procurement Of Symphysis Block Graft Using Dynamic Navigation: Accuracy Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.2806Keywords:
N/AAbstract
Background: In order to restore bone volume in atrophic alveolar ridges, ridge augmentation is an essential operation in dental implantology. Conventional techniques, however beneficial, frequently provide difficulties with accuracy and productivity. With the introduction of dynamic navigation systems to dentistry, there is a chance to improve the precision and results of ridge augmentation operations. With the use of dynamic navigation technology, the accuracy of procuring the block graft is both feasible and accurate. Materials and
Methods: Cadaver mandibles with inadequate alveolar ridges were chosen. The ridge augmentation procedure was led by a dynamic navigation system. A 3D model of the mandible was created using CBCT images for preoperative planning, and the navigation system was incorporated with it. During the augmentation process, real-time tracking and feedback were given by the navigation system during block graft procurement.
Results: The dynamic navigation system significantly improved the precision of block graft procurement where there was significance in the Apex angular deviation (p value < 0.00) which is important as the underlying vital structures can be properly visualized under Dynamic navigation. Real-time feedback allowed for accurate placement of bone grafts, closely adhering to the preoperative plan. Postoperative CBCT scans confirmed the accuracy of the augmentation, with minimal deviation from the planned augmentation sites.
Conclusion: The precision and predictability of ridge augmentation in cadaver mandibles can be improved with the use of dynamic navigation technology, as this proof-of-concept study shows. The use of dynamic navigation into clinical practice has promise for enhancing surgical outcomes and mitigating problems linked to conventional ridge augmentation techniques.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Wadhwani CP, Albrektsson T, Schoenbaum TR, Chung KH. Residual Debris within Internal Features of As-received New Dental Implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2024 Jun 28;0(0):1–15.
Website [Internet]. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/download/110633998/MS_IJBPAS_2021_AUG_SPCL_1097.pdf
Tolstunov L. Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation in Implant Dentistry: A Surgical Manual. John Wiley & Sons; 2016. 28 p.
Narde J, Ganapathy D, Pandurangan KK. Evaluation of the Success of Autogenous Block Grafting in Atrophic Maxillary and Mandibular Ridges Prior to and After Implant Placement. Cureus. 2024 Feb;16(2):e53829.
Choi H, Sohn DS. Retrospective Study of Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Demineralized Tooth Block Bone for Dental Implant. Bioengineering (Basel) [Internet]. 2024 Jun 20;11(6). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11060633
Website [Internet]. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/download/72338973/IJDOS_2377_8075_07_11025.pdf
Wunder EW, Henon PR. Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Autografts. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012. 285 p.
Hange V. Intraoral Maxillofacial Autografts. Bone Graft Site and Harvesting Technique. GRIN Verlag; 2019. 54 p.
Akman B, Kaya AT, Çelik NG. Relationship of the accessory maxillary ostium to mucosal thickening and maxillary sinus cysts: a 3D segmentation study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol [Internet]. 2024 May 22; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2024.05.008
S. TA, Ganapathy D, R. S. Knowledge And Awareness About Distraction Osteogenesis Among Dental Students. | International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research (09752366) | EBSCOhost. 2020 Jan 1;12(1):2060.
Mangano FG, Yang KR, Lerner H, Admakin O, Mangano C. Artificial intelligence and mixed reality for dental implant planning: A technical note. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res [Internet]. 2024 Jun 28; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.13357
Sudarssan SG, Wahab PUA. Prevalence of Myths and Misconceptions about Dental Extractions among Outpatients of a Private Dental College Hospital. | Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development | EBSCOhost. 2019 Aug 1;10(8):333.
Chhabra K, Selvaganesh S, Nesappan T. Hybrid Navigation Technique for Improved Precision in Implantology. Cureus [Internet]. 2023 Sep [cited 2024 Jul 1];15(9). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10582648/
Selvaganesh S, Nesappan T. Comparative Evaluation of the Accuracy, Operator Comfort and Time Taken for Implant Placement among Different Practitioners under Dynamic Navigation. | Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research | EBSCOhost. 2023 Oct 1;17(10):10.
Sarvasri T, Krishnaswamy VK, Arularasan G. Radiological Assessment Of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar. JBME. 2023 Sep 15;40(3):358–61.
Elumalai M, Rathinavelu PK, Indiran MA, Doraikannan SS, Prabkakar J. Patient self-reported satisfaction with dental implant treatment among outpatients visiting - A Private Dental College Hospital [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2024 Jul 2]. Available from: https://openurl.ebsco.com/contentitem/gcd:133549320?sid=ebsco:plink:crawler&id=ebsco:gcd:133549320
Nentwich M. Cyberscience: Research in the Age of the Internet. 2003. 604 p.
Koutouzis T, Bembey K, Sofos S. The Effect of Osteotomy Preparation Technique and Implant Diameter on Primary Stability and Bone-implant Interface of Short Implants (6 mm). Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2024 Jun 28;0(0):1–20.
Osseointegrated Implants in the Treatment of the Edentulous Jaw: Experience from a 10-year Period. 1977. 140 p.
Hakeberg M. Dental Anxiety and Health: A Prevalence Study and Assessment of Treatment Outcomes. 1992. 154 p.
Convissar RA. Principles and Practice of Laser Dentistry: Pageburst Retail. Mosby Incorporated; 2010. 400 p.
Wismeijer D, Buser D, Belser UC. Loading Protocols in Implant Dentistry: Partially Dentate Patients. Quintessenz Verlag; 2019. 345 p.
K. M, P. SM, Kumar A. Effectiveness Of Different Types Of Bone Grafts And Prf/Cgf Used By Various Departments In A University Hospital Setting - A Retrospective Study [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 Jul 2]. Available from: https://openurl.ebsco.com/contentitem/gcd:160600470?sid=ebsco:plink:crawler&id=ebsco:gcd:160600470
Malik NA. Textbook of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. JP Medical Ltd; 2012. 1053 p.
Keerthana B, Khandelwal A. Assessment of knowledge,attitude and practice towards dental environment noise among dental students. NVEO. 2021 Nov 11;6321–36.
Khan M, Javed F, Haji Z, Ghafoor R. Comparison of the positional accuracy of robotic guided dental implant placement with static guided and dynamic navigation systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2024 Mar 14; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.02.015
Nagappan N, John J. Patient satisfaction with the dental services offered by a dental Hospital in India. Journal of Indian Association of Public Health Dentistry. 2014;12(4):297.
Fekry YES, Mahmoud NR. Vertical ridge augmentation of atrophic posterior mandible with corticocancellous onlay symphysis graft versus sandwich technique: clinical and radiographic analysis. Odontology. 2023 Oct;111(4):993–1002.
Kumar MPS. KNOWLEDGE REGARDING BIOLOGY AND TREATMENT OF EXTRACTION SOCKETS AMONG UNDERGRADUATE DENTAL STUDENTS [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2024 Jul 2]. Available from: https://openurl.ebsco.com/contentitem/gcd:134920787?sid=ebsco:plink:crawler&id=ebsco:gcd:134920787
Yang M, Ma Y, Han W, Qu Z. The safety of maxillary sinus floor elevation and the accuracy of implant placement using dynamic navigation. PLoS One. 2024 May 23;19(5):e0304091.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
