Complete Septate Uterus- A Rare Occurrence Challenging Pregnancy

Authors

  • Ramyapriya Pojala
  • Shriraj Katakdhond

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.2830

Keywords:

Septate uterus, Müllerian anomaly, Hysteroscopic septal resection, Infertility, Uterine duplication and Reproductive outcomes

Abstract

A septate uterus is the most common Müllerian anomaly, often linked to reproductive challenges such as infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss. This condition results from incomplete resorption of the embryologic Müllerian ducts. Diagnostic criteria differ across medical organizations: ASRM defines a septate uterus by an indentation depth greater than 15 mm and an angle less than 90°, while ESHRE uses an indentation-to-wall-thickness (I:WT) ratio exceeding 50%. Accurate diagnosis and timely surgical intervention are crucial for improving reproductive outcomes. We present the case of a 24-year-old nulliparous female with primary infertility for three years. Clinical examination revealed a vaginal septum, confirmed by ultrasound to be a complete septate uterus with endovaginal and endocervical duplication. The patient underwent successful hysteroscopic septal resection, resulting in the removal of the uterine and cervical septa. Postoperative care included an intrauterine Foley catheter and estrogen therapy. She conceived naturally nine months post-surgery and had an uneventful recovery. Hysteroscopic septal resection remains the gold standard treatment for symptomatic septate uterus, improving pregnancy rates. Literature reports indicate a 62% pregnancy success rate post-resection. This case underscores the importance of early diagnosis and intervention to prevent adverse reproductive outcomes. Although many patients remain asymptomatic, identifying and managing a septate uterus is essential for those experiencing infertility or recurrent pregnancy loss. This report adds to the growing body of evidence supporting hysteroscopic management as an effective approach to improving reproductive potential in patients with congenital uterine anomalies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Pfeifer SM, Attaran M, Goldstein J, Lindheim SR, Petrozza JC, Rackow BW, Siegelman E, Troiano R, Winter T, Zuckerman A, Ramaiah SD. ASRM müllerian anomalies classification 2021. FertilSteril. 2021 Nov;116(5):1238-1252. [PubMed: 34756327]

Ludwin A, Martins WP, Nastri CO, Ludwin I, Coelho Neto MA, Leitão VM, Acién M, Alcazar JL, Benacerraf B, Condous G, De Wilde RL, Emanuel MH, Gibbons W, Guerriero S, Hurd WW, Levine D, Lindheim S, Pellicer A, Petraglia F, Saridogan E. Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME): better criteria for distinguishing between normal/arcuate and septate uterus? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;51(1):101-109. [PubMed: 29024135]

Jacquinet A, Millar D, Lehman A. Etiologies of uterine malformations. Am J Med Genet A. 2016 Aug;170(8):2141-72. [PubMed: 27273803]

Uomoto M, Obata S, Yumoto A, et al. A case of successful pregnancy in a septate uterus after discharge of decidual tissue in the second trimester. Clin Case Rep. 2021;9(4):2382-2384. Published 2021 Mar 11. doi:10.1002/ccr3.4042

Obata S, Noguchi T, Chiba S, Miyagi E, Aoki S. Case of decidual discharge from the nonpregnant uterine cavity of the bicorporeal uterus before onset of delivery. J ObstetGynaecol Res. 2019;45:1410‐1413. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

TullioGhi, Francesca De Musso, Elisa Maroni, Aly Youssef, Luca Savelli, Antonio Farina, et al; The pregnancy outcome in women with incidental diagnosis of septate uterus at first trimester scan, Human Reproduction, Volume 27, Issue 9, September 2012, Pages 2671–2675, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des215

Chan Y.Y., Jayaprakasan K., Zamora J., Thornton J.G., Raine-Fenning N., Coomarasamy A. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: A systematic review. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2011;17:761–771. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr028.

Tonguc EA, Var T, Yilmaz N, Batioglu S. Intrauterine device or estrogen treatment after hysteroscopic uterine septum resection. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;109(3):226-229. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.12.015

Esmaeilzadeh S, Delavar MA, Andarieh MG. Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic treatment of uterine septum. Mater Sociomed. 2014 Dec;26(6):366-71. doi: 10.5455/msm.2014.26.366-371. Epub 2014 Dec 14. PMID: 25685079; PMCID: PMC4314157.

Abuzeid OM, Hebert J, Ashraf M, Mitwally M, Diamond MP, Abuzeid MI. Pediatric Foley Catheter Placement After Operative Hysteroscopy Does Not Cause Ascending Infection. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Jan;25(1):133-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.06.031. Epub 2017 Aug 26. PMID: 28847756.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-31

How to Cite

1.
Pojala R, Katakdhond S. Complete Septate Uterus- A Rare Occurrence Challenging Pregnancy. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Mar.31 [cited 2025Oct.2];14(10S):407-10. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/2830