Unveiling Complex Morphological Patterns in Mammogram Images for Early-Stage Breast Cancer Detection with Siamese Watershed Graph Convolution Networks

Authors

  • Thulasibai Ayipuzha
  • Bharath Singh Jebalraj

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.3122

Keywords:

Early-stage breast cancer detection, Mammogram images, Siamese Watershed Graph Convolutional Network (SW-GCN), Classifier performance, Morphological patterns, Deep learning, Diagnostic accuracy

Abstract

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of death among women, characterized by the uncontrolled growth of cells. Early detection is crucial for effective treatment, particularly in differentiating between benign and malignant conditions using image processing techniques. X-ray mammography is the most reliable method for early detection, but the resulting images are often complex, making it difficult to accurately extract quantitative and meaningful features from overlapping nuclear morphologies. Advancements in medical imaging are therefore essential. In this study, we present a novel approach using Siamese Watershed Graph Convolutional Networks (SWGCN) to automatically classify abnormalities in mammograms with higher accuracy. The Watershed Graph Convolutional Network technique effectively separates dissimilar nuclei and determines object borders based on gradient and intensity values, even with complex, overlapping features. The Siamese network distinguishes between benign and malignant tumors with improved accuracy by using pairs of nuclei images as inputs and assessing whether the pairs belong to the same class (benign or malignant) based on features extracted by the GCN. Our proposed method demonstrates superior feature extraction capabilities. The SWGCN system achieved high performance, with an F1-score of 90%, recall of 99.2%, accuracy of 97.15%, and precision of 90%. This research represents a significant advancement in image processing methods for healthcare, emphasizing their potential to improve early-stage breast cancer detection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bray F, Laversanne M, Weiderpass E, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249.

American Cancer Society. Breast cancer screening guidelines. American Cancer Society. Available from: https://www.cancer.org

Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57(2):75-89.

Sickles EA. Screening mammography: Current guidelines and controversies. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(4):351-359.

LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015;521(7553):436-444.

Roth HR, Lu L, Seff A, et al. Deep learning for breast cancer detection and diagnosis: A review. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2017;10:1-16.

Bromley J, Guyon I, LeCun Y, et al. Signature verification using a “Siamese” time delay neural network. Int J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell. 1994;7(4):669-688.

Vincent L, Soille P. Watershed-based segmentation and region merging. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1991;13(6):583-598.

Kipf TN, Welling M. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR); 2017.

Yala A, Lehman C, Schuster T, et al. A deep learning model to triage screening mammograms: A simulation study. Radiology. 2019;292(1):14-22.

Esteva A, Robicquet A, Ramsundar B, et al. A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):24-29.

Liu Y, Wei B, Gu X, et al. Breast cancer detection using deep learning algorithms: A review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020;146(12):3191-3207.

Loizidou, Kosmia, Rafaella Elia, and Costas Pitris. "Computer-aided breast cancer detection and classification in mammography: A comprehensive review." Computers in Biology and Medicine 153 (2023): 106554.

Ginsburg O, Yip CH, Brooks A, Cabanes A, Caleffi M, Dunstan Yataco JA, Gyawali B, McCormack V, McLaughlin de Anderson M, Mehrotra R, Mohar A, Murillo R, Pace LE, Paskett ED, Romanoff A, Rositch AF, Scheel JR, Schneidman M, Unger-Saldaña K, Vanderpuye V, Wu TY, Yuma S, Dvaladze A, Duggan C, Anderson BO. Breast cancer early detection: A phased approach to implementation. Cancer. 2020 May 15;126 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):2379-2393. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32887.

Jalloul R, Chethan HK, Alkhatib R. A Review of Machine Learning Techniques for the Classification and Detection of Breast Cancer from Medical Images. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jul 24;13(14):2460. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13142460.

Chan HP, Samala RK, Hadjiiski LM, Zhou C. Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1213:3-21. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-33128-3_1.

Elhani, D., Megherbi, A., Zitouni, A., Dornaika, F., Sbaa, S., & Taleb-Ahmed, A. (2023). Optimizing convolutional neural networks architecture using a modified particle swarm optimization for image classification. Expert Systems With Applications, 229, 120411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120411

Yang, G., Cao, J., Chen, Z., Guo, J., & Li, J. (2020). Graph-based neural networks for explainable image privacy inference. Pattern Recognition, 105, 107360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107360

Ahmedt-Aristizabal D, Armin MA, Denman S, Fookes C, Petersson L. Graph-Based Deep Learning for Medical Diagnosis and Analysis: Past, Present and Future. Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 12;21(14):4758. doi: 10.3390/s21144758.

Son J, Kim D. Development of a graph convolutional neural network model for efficient prediction of protein-ligand binding affinities. PLoS One. 2021 Apr 8;16(4):e0249404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249404.

Khan MSI, Rahman A, Debnath T, Karim MR, Nasir MK, Band SS, Mosavi A, Dehzangi I. Accurate brain tumor detection using deep convolutional neural network. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022 Aug 27;20:4733-4745. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.08.039.

Kebaili A, Lapuyade-Lahorgue J, Ruan S. Deep Learning Approaches for Data Augmentation in Medical Imaging: A Review. J Imaging. 2023 Apr 13;9(4):81. doi: 10.3390/jimaging9040081.

Kornilov A, Safonov I, Yakimchuk I. A Review of Watershed Implementations for Segmentation of Volumetric Images. J Imaging. 2022 Apr 26;8(5):127. doi: 10.3390/jimaging8050127.

Zhou K, Li W, Zhao D. Deep learning-based breast region extraction of mammographic images combining pre-processing methods and semantic segmentation supported by Deeplab v3. Technol Health Care. 2022;30(S1):173-190. doi: 10.3233/THC-228017.

Sharma AK, Nandal A, Dhaka A, Koundal D, Bogatinoska DC, Alyami H. Enhanced Watershed Segmentation Algorithm-Based Modified ResNet50 Model for Brain Tumor Detection. Biomed Res Int. 2022 Feb 24;2022:7348344. doi: 10.1155/2022/7348344. Retraction in: Biomed Res Int. 2023 Dec 29;2023:9865972. doi: 10.1155/2023/9865972.

Gonzalez RC, Woods RE. Digital Image Processing. Pearson; 2008.

Rosenfeld A, Kak AC. Digital Picture Processing. Academic Press; 1982.

Otsu N. A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1979;9(1):62-66.

Meyer F. Topographic distance and watershed lines. Signal Process. 1994;38(1):113-125.

Bai, J., Jin, A., Wang, T., Yang, C., & Nabavi, S. (2022). Feature fusion Siamese network for breast cancer detection comparing current and prior mammograms. Medical Physics, 49(6), 3654-3669.

Rmili, M., Moutaouakkil, A. E., & Saleck, M. M. (2022). Hybrid Mammogram Segmentation Using Watershed and Region Growing. In Advances in Information, Communication and Cybersecurity: Proceedings of ICI2C’21 (pp. 23-32). Springer International Publishing.

Tian, Z., Li, X., Zheng, Y., Chen, Z., Shi, Z., Liu, L., & Fei, B. (2020). Graph‐convolutional‐network‐based interactive prostate segmentation in MR images. Medical physics, 47(9), 4164-4176.

Agarwal, R., Diaz, O., Yap, M. H., Lladó, X., & Marti, R. (2020). Deep learning for mass detection in full field digital mammograms. Computers in biology and medicine, 121, 103774.

34. Khan, H. N., Shahid, A. R., Raza, B., Dar, A. H., & Alquhayz, H. (2019). Multi-view feature fusion based four views model for mammogram classification using convolutional neural network. IEEE Access, 7, 165724-165733

35. Kayode, A. A., Akande, N. O., Adegun, A. A., & Adebiyi, M. O. (2019). An automated mammogram classification system using modified support vector machine. Medical Devices: Evidence and Research, 275-284

Perumal, V. (2016). Performance evaluation and comparative analysis of various machine learning techniques for diagnosis of breast cancer. Biomedical Research (0970-938X), 27(3).

Breiman L. Random Forests. Machine Learning. 2001;45(1):5-32.

Chen T, Guestrin C. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2016;785-794.

Ren S, He K, Girshick R, Sun J. Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2015;39(6):1137-1149.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-07

How to Cite

1.
Ayipuzha T, Singh Jebalraj B. Unveiling Complex Morphological Patterns in Mammogram Images for Early-Stage Breast Cancer Detection with Siamese Watershed Graph Convolution Networks. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Apr.7 [cited 2025Sep.23];14(8S):826-35. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/3122