An Analysis Of Management As A Dynamic Function And Its Evolution And Adaptation To Changes In Economic, Socio-Political, Or Technological Environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.3294Keywords:
Dynamic administration, economic, socio-political, technicalAbstract
An alternative approach to dynamic workplace management that promotes knowledge exchange is offered. Taking a proactive stance as a manager means shaping the workplace in real time. Workers move about the office in self-contained clusters, each with its own timetable for getting things done. Coordination of timing and organization of activities, as well as grouping tasks such that group members are physically close to one another and have access to relevant data for the intra-group task at hand, are two ways to guarantee that information is easily shared. Task sets and groups, their composition and structure, the order in which they occur, the temporal characteristics of tasks, and the naming conventions for data relevant to these tasks are all affected by the environment's dynamic nature. This is then achieved by applying a mathematical formulation to the issue. A clustering approach was developed by researchers to address issues. There are a lot of examples given so that students can understand the procedure completely. As a bonus, the proposed approach may be useful in the ever-changing administration of different types of resources required to complete the tasks
Downloads
Metrics
References
Jones, R., & Brown, L. (2020). Leading Remote Teams: Strategies for Success in a Virtual World. Harvard Business Review, 35, 101-115.
Smith, J. Q., Jones, M. R., & Brown, C. D. (2020). Advancing Managerial Evolution and Resource Management in Contemporary Business Landscapes. Journal of Management Studies, 58, 1-25.
Brown, S., & Williams, E. (2019). Leveraging Technology for Resource Optimization. Strategic Management Journal, 40, 1121-1140.
Ferrari M. Reflexive governance for infrastructure resilience and sustainability. Sustainability 2020; 12: 1–8.
Naslund D, Norrman A. A performance measurement system for change initiatives: an action research study from design to evaluation. Bus Proc Manag J 2019; 25: 1647–1672.
Fransella, F. 1975. Need to Change? London, Methuen Essential Psychology Series 2021. Zietsma C, Lawrence TB (2020) Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: the interplay of boundary work and practice work. Adm Sci Q 55(2):189–221
Smith WK, Lewis MW (2022) Both/and thinking: embracing creative tensions to solve your toughest problems. HBR Press, Boston
Hahn T, Knight E (2021) The ontology of organizational paradox: a quantum approach. Acad Manag Rev 46(2):362–384
Carmine S, Smith WK (2020). Organizational paradox. In: Oxford bibliographies
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.