Scrutinizing India's Regulatory Framework On Gm Crops: Aligning Sustainable Environmental Practices With Food Security Demands
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i6.3321Keywords:
GM Crops, Food Security,Regulatory Framework, Sustainable Agriculture, BiosafetyAbstract
This study rigorously analyses India's regulatory structure for Genetically Modified (GM) crops, emphasising its potential to reconcile environmental sustainability with food security demands. India confronts the simultaneous problem of sustaining an expanding population while safeguarding its diverse biodiversity and ecological systems. Genetically modified crops, regarded as a potential solution for improving agricultural productivity, provide both advantages and hazards. This study assesses the legislative frameworks, policies, and regulatory entities tasked with supervising GM crops, with a special focus on the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) and other key authorities. The study examines case studies, including Bt. cotton, to evaluate the actual effects of genetically modified crops on food security and sustainability. Challenges such as public opposition, the deficiencies in risk assessment, and gaps in regulatory enforcement are highlighted. The study concludes with policy recommendations to align GM crop regulation with sustainable Agricultural practices, suggesting reforms to improve biosafety protocols, transparency, and inter-agency coordination.
Downloads
Metrics
References
The EC - FAO Food Security Programme, & Zezza, A., and. (2003). Food Security Information for Action. In Practical Guides. https://www.fao.org/3/al936e/al936e00.pdf
Martin. (2023, October 19). Goal 2: Zero hunger - United Nations Sustainable Development. UnitedNations Sustainable Development. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/hunger/
Hunger and food insecurity | FAO | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (n.d.). Hunger And Food Insecurity. https://www.fao.org/hunger/en
Index, G. H. (2024c, October 22). India. Global Hunger Index (GHI) - Peer-reviewed Annual Publication Designed to Comprehensively Measure and Track Hunger at the Global, Regional, and Country Levels. https://www.globalhungerindex.org/india.html
Von Grebmer, K., Bernstein, J., Wiemers, M., Reiner, L., Bachmeier, M., Hanano, A., Towey, O., Ní Chéilleachair, R., Foley, C., Gitter, S., Larocque, G., Fritschel, H., Danielle Resnick, Brookings Institution, International Food Policy Research Institute, Welthungerhilfe, Concern Worldwide, Mogge, M., & MacSorley, D. (2022). GLOBAL HUNGER INDEX FOOD SYSTEMS TRANSFORMATION AND LOCAL GOVERNANCE. https://www.globalhungerindex.org/pdf/en/2022.pdf
(2022, October 16). India ranks 107 on 2022 Global Hunger Index, behind Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal. The Economic Times. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/india/level-of-hunger-in-india-serious-ranks-107-on-global-hunger-index-2022/articleshow/94876759.cms?from=mdr
(What Is Biotechnology? | BIO, n.d.)Biotechnology FAQs. (n.d.). USDA. https://www.usda.gov/topics/biotechnology/biotechnology-frequently-asked-questions-faqs
.What is Biotechnology at the Department of Biotechnology and Food Science? - NTNU. (n.d.). NTNU.https://www.ntnu.edu/ibt/about-us/what-is-biotechnology#:~:text=Biotechnology%20is%20technology%20that%20utilizes,to%20produce%20the%20desired%20product)
Food, genetically modified. (2024, October 4). https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/food-genetically-modified
Kolady DE, Herring RJ. 2014. Regulation of genetically engineered crops in India: implications of pol icy uncertainty for social welfare, competition, and innovation. Can J Agric Economics/Revue canadienned’agroeconomie. 62(4):471–490.
MoEF Notification. 1989. Rules for the manufacture, use, import, export and storage of hazardous micro-organisms, genetically engineered organisms or cells.http://envfor.nic.in/ legis/hsm/hsm3.html.
Indian Agriculture. (n.d.). NATIONAL SEEDS POLICY, 2002.
India. (2003). THE BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY ACT, 2002. In THE BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY ACT, 2002. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/2046/4/a2003-18.pdf
Parliament of India. (2006). THE FOOD SAFETY AND STANDARDS ACT, 2006. In Food Safety and Standards Act.https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/7800/1/200634_food_safety_and_standards_act,_2006.pdf
Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC), Biotech Consortium India Limited, New Delhi, Arora, S., Chimata, M. K., Project Coordination Unit (Phase II [15].Capacity Building Project on Biosafety), & Ahuja, V. (n.d.). Handbook for food safety officials. In UNEP/GEF supported Phase II Capacity Building Project on Biosafety.
Khadi, B. M. & Central Institute for Cotton Research. (2007). Story of BT Cotton in India. In Khadi_Paper_English.
Kathage, J., & Qaim, M. (2012). Economic impacts and impact dynamics of Bt. (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton in India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(29), 11652–11656. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1203647109
James, C. (2011). Global status of commercialized Biotech/GM crops: 2011. In ISAAA Briefs. ISAAA. https://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/43/download/isaaa-brief-43-2011.pdf
Qaim, M., &Kouser, S. (2013). Genetically modified crops and food security. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e64879. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064879
Tripathi, L., Dhugga, K. S., Ntui, V. O., Runo, S., Syombua, E. D., Muiruri, S., Wen, Z., & Tripathi, J. N. (2022). Genome editing for sustainable agriculture in Africa. Frontiers in Genome Editing, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2022.876697
Tseng, M., Roel, A., Deambrosi, E., Terra, J. A., Zorrilla, G., Riccetto, S., & Pittelkow, C. M. (2020). Towards actionable research frameworks for sustainable intensification in high-yielding rice systems. Scientific Reports, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63251-w
Smyth, S. J. (2022). Contributions of genome editing technologies towards improved nutrition, environmental sustainability and poverty reduction. Frontiers in Genome Editing, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2022.863193
Tripathi, J. N., Ntui, V. O., Shah, T., & Tripathi, L. (2021). CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated editing of DMR6 orthologue in banana (Musa spp.) confers enhanced resistance to bacterial disease. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 19(7), 1291–1293. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13614
European Commission. (2010). A decade of EU-funded GMO research (2001 - 2010) (Report EUR 24473 EN). https://doi.org/10.2777/97784
Brookes, G., & Barfoot, P. (2015). Environmental impacts of genetically modified (GM) crop use 1996–2013: Impacts on pesticide use and carbon emissions. GM Crops & Food, 6(2), 103–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2015.1025193
Klümper, W., & Qaim, M. (2014). A Meta-Analysis of the impacts of Genetically Modified crops. PLoS ONE, 9(11), e111629. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111629
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
