Comparative Effectiveness Of Orthogonal Plating Versus Traditional Methods In The Management Of Intercondylar Humerus Fractures

Authors

  • Subhodip Dutta
  • Puneet Bansal
  • Gyan Prakash
  • Rohit Rana
  • Ambrish Kumar Singh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.3380

Keywords:

intercondylar humerus fractures, orthogonal plating, functional recovery, early mobilization, surgical outcomes

Abstract

Background: Intercondylar humerus fractures represent a significant challenge in orthopedic surgery, with traditional fixation methods often failing to meet the demands for optimal functional recovery. Orthogonal plating has emerged as a viable alternative, purported to offer superior stability and facilitate early mobilization.

Methods: This study conducted at Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, retrospectively and prospectively analyzed 22 patients with intercondylar humerus fractures treated via orthogonal plating. Patient demographics, surgical details, post-operative outcomes, and complications were systematically reviewed, with functional outcomes assessed through range of motion (ROM) measurements and Mayo Elbow Performance Scores (MEPS).

Results: The patient cohort predominantly comprised fractures classified as 13C2 (54.5%), with a mean age of 39.09 years. The analysis revealed a noteworthy improvement in ROM and MEPS, with a significant portion of patients achieving good to excellent outcomes. Early surgical intervention was associated with enhanced functional recovery, highlighting the role of orthogonal plating in facilitating early mobilization. Complication rates were comparatively low, indicating the method's safety and efficacy.

Conclusion: Orthogonal plating demonstrates a clear advantage over traditional fixation methods in managing intercondylar humerus fractures, particularly in terms of functional recovery and complication management. The study advocates for its increased utilization in orthopedic practice, with a focus on early surgical intervention and rehabilitation to optimize patient outcomes

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Jupiter JB, Mehne DK. Fractures of the distal humerus. Orthopedics.1992;15(7):825-33.

Kwee J. Distal humeral fracture: Basic management concepts. Injury. 2006:2-27.

Begue T. Articular fractures of the distal humerus. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res.2014;100:55-63.

X Lan, LH Zhang, S Tao, Q Zhang, XD Liang, BT Yuan, et al. Comparative study of perpendicular versus parallel double plating methods for type C distal humeral fractures. Chin Med J.2013; 126:2337–2342.

Korner J, Lill H, Muller LP, PM Rommens, E Schneider, B Linke. The LCP concept in the operative treatment of distal humerus fractures–biological, biomechanical and surgical aspects. Injury. 34.2003: B20–B30.

Robinson CM, Hill RM, Jacobs N et al. Adult distal humeral metaphyseal fractures: epidemiology and results of treatment. J Orthop Trauma. 2003; 17 (1) :38-47.

Vazquez O, Rutgers M, Ring DC, Walsh M, Egol KA. Fate of the ulnar nerve after operative fixation of distal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010; 24: 395–9.

WT Gofton, JC Macdermid, SD Patterson, KJ Faber, GJ King. Functional outcome of AO type C distal humeral fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28:294–308.

J Sodergard, J Sandelin, O Bostman. Postoperative complications of distal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1992;63: 85–89.

Nauth A, McKee MD, Ristevski B, Hall J, Schemitsch EH. Distal humeral fractures in adults. J Bone and Jt Surgery American volume. 2011;93:686-700.

Bryce DC, Armstrong AD. Anatomy and biomechanics of the elbow. Orthop Clin N Am. 2008;39: 141-154.

Helfet David L, Hotchkiss RN. Internal fixation of the distal humerus: A biomechanical comparison of methods. J Orthop Trauma. 1990;4:260-264.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-10

How to Cite

1.
Dutta S, Bansal P, Prakash G, Rana R, Singh AK. Comparative Effectiveness Of Orthogonal Plating Versus Traditional Methods In The Management Of Intercondylar Humerus Fractures. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Apr.10 [cited 2025Sep.13];14(13S):874-7. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/3380