A Clinical Evaluation Of The Performance Of 3 Resin Based Composites In Posterior Restortion-An Invivo Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.3397Keywords:
Composite Restoration, Secondary Caries, Marginal adaptationAbstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of 3 different composites: Packable, Microhybrid and Nanohybrid as a posterior restorative material in class 1 carious lesion. The purpose was to evaluate and compare the clinical behaviour under the following criterias : Color match, Cavosurface marginal discoloration, Secondary caries, Anatomic form (wear), Marginal adaptation and Post operative sensitivity. 60 class 1 lesions were restored , 20 each with packable composite, microhybrid composite and nanohybrid composite. Patients with class 1 carious lesions in permanent molars were selected. The assessment were done according to USPHS criteria. It was then concluded that all materials showed satisfactory results as far as retention was concerned. But the marginal integrity and appearance of Filtek TM Z350 was better.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Cigdem Celika, Neslihan Arhunb, Kivanc Yamanela. European Journal of Dentistry, January 2010 - Vol.4, page -57-65.
Collins CJ, Bryant RW, Hodge KLV. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8 year findings. Journal of Dentistry 1998; 26 (4): 311-317.
Raskin A, Theall BM, Vreven J, Wilson NHF. Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite: 10-year report. Journal of Dentistry 1999; 27:13-19.
Letzel H. Survival rates and reasons for failure of posterior composite restorations in multicentre clinical trial. J Dent 1989;17 Suppl 1:S10-17.
Stangel I, Barolet RY. Clinical evaluation of two posterior composite resins: two-year results. J Oral Rehabil 1990;17:257-268.
Loguercio AD, Reis A, Rodrigues Filho LE & Busato ALS (2001) One-year clinical evaluation of posterior packable resin composite restorations Operative Dentistry 26(3) 427–434.
Schirrmeister JF, Huber K, Hellwig E, Hahn P. Two-year evaluation of a new nano-ceramic restorative material. Clinical Oral Investigation 2006; 10(3): 181-6.
Fabio Barbosa de Souza (2005):- A clinical evaluation of packable and microhybrid resin composite restorations: one-year report. Quintessence int.2005;36;41-48.
D. Bharadwaj, P. Lambrechts, J. De Munck, D. Mattar, and B. Van Meerbeek, The clinical wear performance of Filtek Z100 and Filtek supreme composites : IADR 2005,p-45-52.
D. Pardal and M. Hegde : Clinical Evaluation Of Different Posterior Composite Restorative Materials In Class I And Class II Restorations: An In-Vivo Study. The Inter Journal of Dent Scien. 2009; Volume 7 Number 2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
