To Study the Outcome of Dead Space Closure Utilizing Quilting Suture Versus Conventional Closure with Drainage for The Prevention of Seroma After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.4039Keywords:
N\AAbstract
Background: Postoperative seroma is a common complication after mastectomy with a highly variable cited incidence of 3% to more than 90%. Complications of seroma vary from delayed wound healing, repeated seroma aspirations with the risk of infection, prolonged hospital stay, skin flap necrosis, patient discomfort, repeated visits to the out-patient clinic, delay in commencing adjuvant therapies and higher surgical expenditures. Closing the dead space after mastectomy can be achieved by closed suction drainage, quilting of the skin flaps or application of adhesive tissue glues to the skin flaps before wound closure. There is however no consensus on which technique is most superior and their sequelae. Quilting suture consists in suturing the skin flaps to the underlying musculature to reduce ‘dead space’. The primary objective of this RCT is to assess the effect of flap fixation using sutures on the number of seroma aspirations after mastectomy for breast cancer in the first year following surgery. Secondary objectives include assessment of the number of out-patient clinic visits, infection rate, cosmesis and shoulder movement. Methods: This study was conducted in the department of General surgery, IGIMS, Patna, from to, on patients diagnosed with carcinoma breast undergoing mastectomy. They were randomised into ‘Quilting’ and ‘Conventional’ group by systematic random method. Subsequently the patients underwent mastectomy (simple/ modified radical) with or without axillary dissection. Quilting of the subcutaneous tissue to the pectoralis muscle was done with the help of several parallel rows of continuous running sutures with 2-0 vicryl sutures in the ‘Quilting’ cohort. A close suction drain was placed in the cavity. If axillary dissection was done, a separate drain was placed. In the ‘Conventional’ group, the patients underwent mastectomy (simple/ modified radical) with or without axillary dissection with drain placement in axilla and beneath the flaps separately but without quilting. The wound was closed in 2 layers with vicryl 2-0 and skin staplers. 24- hour drain volume was recorded daily and drains was removed once drain volume was less than 40 mL over 24 h for 3 consecutive days, regardless of time elapsed after surgery or at 5 days following surgery. Result: The study enrolled a total of 229 patients after excluding 35 patients that did not meet the exclusion criteria and 15 patients were lost to follow up. 111 patients belonged to ‘Quilting’ cohort and 118 to the ‘Conventional’ group. The mean operative duration observed in the ‘Quilting’ was significantly higher than the Conventional group (p value-0.0274). The mean total drain content noted during the post-operative hospital stay in the ‘Quilting’ group was significantly lower (p value= 0.019). A significant higher mean frequency of aspirations was performed in the ‘Conventional’ group (p<0.001). The total number of visits were higher in the ‘Conventional’ group (p value=0.037). The infection rates consistent with the wound erythema and the need for surgical drainage evaluated in the two cohorts were not significant (p value: 0.190). The rates of wound dehiscence were significantly lower in the ‘Quilting’ cohort (p= 0.035). The range of arm abduction was non-significant with a p value of 0.106. The ‘Quilting’ cohort had a significantly better wound cosmesis than the ‘Conventional’ cohort (p value- 0.029). Conclusion: We conclude that ‘Quilting’ integrated in the wound closure helps in seroma reduction in the patients undergoing mastectomy in breast cancer patients. The incidence of seroma was significantly lower in the ‘Quilting’ group thus reducing the patients’ discomfort and the cost of the treatment. The mean total drain output, the frequency of hospital visits and aspirations were also lower. ‘Quilting’ was also associated with lower rates of wound dehiscence thus giving better cosmesis than the ‘Conventional’ patients. However, the mean total postoperative stay and infection rates were similar in both the groups
Downloads
Metrics
References
Turner EJH, et al. Techniques in the prevention and management of seromas after breast surgery. Future Oncol. 2014;10(6):1049–63.
Ouldamer L, et al. Quilting suture of mastectomy dead space compared with conventional closure with drain. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:4233–40.
Bastelaar V, et al. Flap fixation reduces seroma in patients undergoing mastectomy: a significant implication for clinical practice. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14:66.
Bastelaar V, et al. Flap fixation using tissue glue or sutures appears to reduce seroma aspiration after mastectomy for breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017 July;17(4):316–21.
Khater A, et al. Evaluation of the quilting technique for reduction of postmastectomy seroma:a randomized controlled study. Int J Breast Cancer. vol. 2015, Article ID 287398, 6 pages, 2015.
Mazouni C, Mesnard C, Cloutier AS et al. Quilting sutures reduces seroma in mastectomy. Clin. Breast Cancer 2015; 15: 289–93.
Keyes EL, Hawk BO, Sherwin CS. Basting the axillary flap for wounds of radical mastectomy. AMA Arch Surg 1953;66:446–451.
Larsen BB, Hugan C Jr. Fixation of skin flaps in radical mastectomy by subcutaneous sutures: observations. AMA Arch Surg 1955;71:419–423.
Schuijtvlot M, Sahu AK, Cawthorn SJ. A prospective audit of the use of a buttress suture to reduce seroma formation following axillary node dissection without drains. Breast 2002;11:94–96.
Hamy A, Bouchot-Hermouet FB, Bouchot O, Drianno JC, Guillard Y. Wadding of the axilla in the conservative treatment of cancer of the breast. Prevention of lymphocele. J Chir (Paris) 1990;127:99–102.
O'Dwyer PJ, O'Higgins NJ, James AG. Effect of closing dead space on incidence of seroma after mastectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991;172:55–56.
Myint ST, Khaing KS, Yee W, Mon SM, Lwin T. Quilting suture versus conventional closure in prevention of seroma after total mastectomy and axillary dissection in breast cancer patients. ANZ journal of surgery. 2020 Jul;90(7-8):1408-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.16091.
Burak WE Jr, Goodman PS, Young DC, Farrar WB. Seroma formation following axillary dissection for breast cancer: risk factors and lack of influence of bovine thrombin. J. Surg. Oncol. 1997; 64:27–31.
Zielinski J, Jaworski R, Irga N, Kruszewski JW, Jaskiewicz J. Analysis of selected factors influencing seroma formation in breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy. Arch. Med. Sci. 2013; 9:86–92.
Wu, Y., Wang, S., Hai, J. et al. Quilting suture is better than conventional suture with drain in preventing seroma formation at pectoral area after mastectomy. BMC Surg 20, 65 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00725-8.
Coveney EC, O'Dwyer PJ, Geraghty JG, O'Higgins NJ. Effect of closing dead space on seroma formation after mastectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 1993;19:143–146.
Mazouni C, Mesnard C, Cloutier AS et al. Quilting sutures reduces ser oma in mastectomy. Clin. Breast Cancer 2015; 15: 289–93.
ten Wolde B, van den Wildenberg FJ, Keemers-Gels ME. Quilting prevents seroma formation following breast cancer surgery: closing the dead space by quilting prevents seroma following axillary lymph node dissection and mastectomy. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2014; 21: 802–7.
Murugiah L, Lakshmanan C, Palani M. Prospective study on efficacy of mechanical obliteration of dead space following axillary clearance for carcinoma breast in reducing the incidence of seroma formation. J. Evid. Based Med. Healthc. 2017; 4: 2308–13.
Gong Y, Xu J, Shao J et al. Prevention of seroma formation after mas tectomy and axillary dissection by lymph vessel ligation and dead apace closure: a randomized trial. Am. J. Surg. 2010; 200: 352–6.
Morarasu, S., Clancy, C., Ghetu, N. et al. Impact of Quilting Sutures on Surgical Outcomes After Mastectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 29, 3785–3797 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11350-5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

