Comparison of Success Rate of Fixed Partial Denture and Root Canal Treatment for the Management of Grossly Carious Teeth
Keywords:
RCT, FPD, Treatment, CariesAbstract
Background: This study was conducted to compare the success rate of fixed partial denture and root canal treatment for the management of grossly carious teeth.
Material and methods: This study comprised of 100 participants with grossly carious teeth. All the subjects had been informed about the procedure and were asked for consent. All the subjects gave consent for the study and had been included in the trial. The purpose of this study was to compare the success rates of fixed partial denture and root canal treatment for the management of grossly carious teeth. Hence, the subjects had been divided into 2 groups of 50 subjects each. Group 1 consisted of subjects who were planned for fixed partial denture and the 2ng group comprised of 50 subjects who underwent root canal treatment for the management of grossly carious teeth. The findings had been tabulated and statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software.
Results: In this study, there were 50 subjects in group 1 (FPD) and 50 subjects in Group 2 (RCT). When performed RCT, infection was seen in 3 cases, Pain was seen in 2 cases and tooth fracture occurred in 1 case. Total complications were 6/50 (12%). Hence the success rate of RCT was found to be 88%. When given FPD, the complications included denture stomatitis (4/50), debonding and loss of retention (1/50 each) and caries on abutment teeth (2/50). Total complications were 8 (16%). Hence, the success rate of FPD was 84%.
Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, it can be concluded that root canal treatment offers better success rate than fixed partial denture for the management of grossly carious teeth
Downloads
Metrics
References
Zahran S, Patel S, Koller G, Mannocci F. The impact of an enhanced infection control protocol on molar root canal treatment outcome–a randomized clinical trial. Int Endod J. 2021;54:1993–2005.
Fleming CH, Litaker MS, Alley LW, Eleazer PD. Comparison of classic endodontic techniques versus contemporary techniques on endodontic treatment success. J Endod. 2010;36:414–418.
Riis A, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M, Kvist T. Tooth survival after surgical or nonsurgical endodontic retreatment: long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. J Endod. 2018;44:1480–1486.
Kebke S, Fransson H, Brundin M, Mota de Almeida FJ. Tooth survival following root canal treatment by general dental practitioners in a Swedish county–a 10-year follow-up study of a historical cohort. Int Endod J. 2021;54:5–14.
Creugers NH, Kreulen CM. Systematic review of 10 years of systematic reviews in prosthodontics. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16:123–7.
Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications in fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90:31–41.
Sailer I, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: Fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(Suppl 3):86–96.
Dewan H, Haroon TM, Mogla S, Gupta A, Loganathan J, Ahammed AN, Kommuri S. Assessment of Failure Rate of Fixed Partial Dentures: A Clinical Study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022 Jul;14(Suppl 1):S262-S263.
Llena C, Nicolescu T, Perez S, Gonzalez de Pereda S, Gonzalez A, Alarcon I, Monzo A, Sanz JL, Melo M, Forner L. Outcome of Root Canal Treatments Provided by Endodontic Postgraduate Students. A Retrospective Study. J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 25;9(6):1994
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
 
						

