Morphometric Study Of Second Cervical Vertebra- A Dry Bone Study

Authors

  • Avisikta Mahata
  • Vanashri Dhananjay Shinde

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i7.4325

Keywords:

Axis vertebra, Odontoid process, Dens, vertebral Canal, Dens fracture, anterior odontoid screw fixation (AOSF), Superior articulating facets, Spinous process

Abstract

Background: Amongst the seven cervical vertebrae, axis is one of the atypical cervical vertebra. Axis vertebra shows unique features, it includes modification of its body to odontoid process or dens, roomy vertebral canal; unique superior articulating facets make it different than others. The head rotates around the dens of an axis along with the atlas vertebra at the atlantoaxial joint, which permits the head to move freely.

Functionally cervical vertebrae protect the spinal cord, balance the movement of head and protect the vertebral arteries passing through their foramen transversarium. The intervertebral disc present between vertebral body acts as shock absorber.

Person in their life suffers from various disorders of cervical spine like degenerative disorders, disc pathologies, accidental injuries, osteoarthritis; spinal canal stenosis. Sometimes for treatment, surgical interventions are required. As per the literature there is racial variation is found in the dimensions of cervical vertebrae, and the space for surgical intervention is anatomically very complicated and significant. To avoid the fatal complications the instruments designed for the process must be according to the dimensions. The dimensions are also required for the anterior neurosurgical approach for the cervical reconstructions. Unfortunately, the implants are used globally, and it was observed that population variations exist in the measurements of the vertebrae. The study is carried out to provide a data of various dimensions of axis vertebra and to see the parameters which show the racial differences.

Present study is carried out with prior Ethics committee permission letter. It includes 100 dry human axis vertebrae from different medical colleges (Indian origin).Measurements are taken using digital vernier calliper and goniometer. Results are analyzed with appropriate statistical tests. Measurements are taken in millimeter, and angle in degree.

Results: Height of dens mean and SD is (14.67 ± 2.16) mm, circumference of dens Mean and SD is (33.12 ± 5.89) mm, width of dens Mean and SD is (9.95± 1.12) mm and total height of axis Mean and SD is (34.44 ±3.88) mm. In vertebral canal there is AP diameter Mean and SD is (18.19± 2.03), Transverse diameter is Mean and SD is (21.50 ±2.09). There was no statistically any significant difference about measurements of superior articulating facets of right and left side with p value much higher than(0.05). Range of dense –axis sagittal angle is 1 to 14.5 degree. Width of spinous process is more than length of spinous process. On comparison with other studies the width of dens and anterior-posterior, transverse diameter of the vertebral canal of Axis shows racial differences.

Conclusion: The dimensions will help the spine surgeons while dealing with the patients with cervical region pathology. It will also help in implants, screw, instruments designing. As the Racial differences are there in morphometry the study will helpful while treating patients of Indian origin. The findings of this study will help in Forensic and Anthropological point of view.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

William M, Newell RLM, Collin P. The back: cervical vertebrae, in Gray’s Anatomy, Standring S, Ellis H, Haely JC, and Williams A, Eds., Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, London, UK, 39th edition, 2005:742-6.

ABUZAYED B, TUTUNCULER B, KUCUKYURUK B, TUZGEN S (2010) Anatomic basis of anterior and posterior instrumentation of the spine: morphometric study. Surg Radiol Anat, 32(1): 75-85.

KARAIKOVIC EE, KUNAKORNSAWAT S, DAUBS MD, MADSEN TW, GAINES RW (2000) Surgical anatomy of the cervical pedicles: landmarks for posterior cervical pedicle entrance localization. J Spine Disord, 13 (1): 63-72.

Shilpa Gosavi, Vatsala Swamy. Morphometric study of the Axis vertebra. Eur J Anat, 16 (2): 98-103 (2012)

Joshi, Anagha. (2017). MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE AXIS VERTEBRA IN INDIAN POPULATION: MANOEUVRING THROUGH THE CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION. Indian Journal of Scientific Research. 6. 580- 582.

Sengul, Goksin & Kadioglu, Hakan. (2006). Morphometric anatomy of the atlas and axis vertebrae. 16. 69-76.

Ravi, Kumar & Singla, Mukesh & Goel, Prabhat. (2015). Morphometric Analysis of Axis and Its Clinical Significance -An Anatomical Study of Indian Human Axis Vertebrae. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH. 9. 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13118.5931.

Javed Alam , Ram Sagar Yadav , Vipin Kumar et al. A Morphometric Study of The Odontoid Process of Axis Vertebra in North Indian Population. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res., ISSN: 0976 – 044X, 84(3) - March 2024; Article No. 21, Pages: 150-153 DOI: 10.47583/ijpsrr.2024.v84i03.021

Anderson LD, & D’Alonzo RT: Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:1663–1674, 1974

Joaquim AF, & Patel AP: C1 and C2 spine trauma: evaluation, classification and treatment. Contemp Spine Surg 11:3 1–7, 2010

Joaquim AF, & Patel AP: Occipito cervical trauma: evaluation, classification and treatment. Contemp Spine Surg 11:4 1–5, 2010

Clark CR, & White AA III: Fractures of the dens. A multi-center study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:1340–1348, 1985

Dailey AT, , Hart D, , Finn MA, , Schmidt MH, & Apfelbaum RI: Anterior fixation of odontoid fractures in an elderly population. J Neurosurg Spine 12:1–8, 2010

aro V, , Papalia R, , Di Martino A, , Denaro L, & Maffulli N: The best surgical treatment for type II fractures of the dens is still controversial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:742–750, 2011

Yusof MI, Yusof AH, Abdullah MS, Hussain TM. Computed tomographic evaluation of xation in type II fracture: AMalaysian perspective.the odontoid process for two screw J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2007;15:67-72. xation of the

Kulkarni AG, Shah SM, Marwah RA, Hanagandi PB, Talwar IR. CTbased evaluation of odontoid morphology in the Indian population. Indian J Orthop. 2013 May; 47(3):250-4.

Sasso R, Doherty BJ, Crawford MJ, Heggeness MH. Biomechanics of odontoid fracture xation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18:1950-3 n SR. Morphology of the Dens. Spine (Philaer MB, Alson MD, Heller JG, Gar

Jenkins JD, Coric D, Branch CL. A clinical comparison of one and two screw odontoid xation. J Neurosurg 1998;89:366-70 xation of odontoid fractures and nonunions. Spine (Phila

Suppl 10:S483-5 16. Nucci RC, Seigal S, Merola AA, Gorup J, Mroczek KJ, Dryer J, et al. Computed xation.tomographic evaluation of the normal adult odontoid: Implications for internal Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:264-70

Mazzara JT, Feilding JW. Effect of C1-C2 rotation on canal size. Clin Orthop Relat Res.1988;237:115-9.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-26

How to Cite

1.
Mahata A, Shinde VD. Morphometric Study Of Second Cervical Vertebra- A Dry Bone Study. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Apr.26 [cited 2025Oct.2];14(7):1-8. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/4325