Study Of Postnatal Umbilical Cord Coiling Index and Its Association with Perinatal Outcome in a Tertiary Care Hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i15S.4481Keywords:
N\AAbstract
Background: The umbilical cord is often seen as just a connecting structure, but its unique pattern of coiling might hold valuable clues about a baby's health. Studies suggest that the number and tightness of coils—known as the Umbilical Coiling Index (UCI)—can affect how well the fetus tolerates labor and overall pregnancy outcomes.
Objective: This study set out to examine how different patterns of umbilical cord coiling, measured after birth, relate to the baby’s health and the events around delivery.
Methods: We conducted a three-month prospective observational study involving 92 women with single pregnancies between 37–40 weeks of gestation. After delivery, we measured the number of complete vascular coils in the cord and calculated the UCI. Based on this, cords were classified as hypocoiled, normocoiled, or hypercoiled. We then compared these groups against delivery mode, birth weight, Apgar scores, NICU admission, and other outcomes.
Results: Most cords fell into the normocoiled category (54.35%), while 20.65% were hypocoiled and 25% hypercoiled. Babies with abnormal cord coiling were more likely to face complications like low Apgar scores, fetal distress, and NICU admission. Hypocoiling was especially linked to poor fetal growth and difficult labor, whereas hypercoiling had stronger ties with gestational diabetes and cesarean delivery.
Conclusion: The pattern of umbilical cord coiling, often overlooked, may provide important insights into the baby’s well-being. Routinely evaluating UCI could help clinicians identify at-risk pregnancies and intervene early.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Yadav S, Goyal M, Jain A. Umbilical coiling index and perinatal outcome: a prospective observational study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2019;8(8):3109–3113.
Chaturvedi P, Chaturvedi A. Umbilical coiling index and perinatal outcome. Int J Sci Study. 2015;3(8):137–141.
Ghosh B, Mittal S, Kumar S. Umbilical coiling index as a marker of perinatal outcome: a prospective study. Indian J Med Sci. 2013;67(3-4):112–117.
Bhat VV, Kumar P, Rao R, Saraswathy K. Umbilical cord coiling index and perinatal outcome. Int J Biol Med Res. 2013;4(4):3641–3645.
Narang Y, Vaid NB, Jain S, Suneja A, Guleria K, Batra S. Abnormal umbilical coiling index and perinatal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289(2):301–305
Strong TH, Jarles DL, Vega JS, Feldman DB. The umbilical coiling index. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170(1 Pt 1):29–32.
Degani S, Lewinsky RM, Berger H, Spiegel D. Sonographic estimation of umbilical coiling index and correlation with Doppler flow characteristics. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86(6):990–993.
Gupta S, Faridi MM, Sharma N. Umbilical cord coiling index: a marker of perinatal outcome. Indian Pediatr. 2006;43(7):571–575.
Nasin J, Devgan P, Bedi M. Umbilical coiling index: a marker of fetal outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014;64(3):169–172.
Predanic M, Perni SC, Chasen ST, Baergen RN. Use of umbilical coiling index in fetal surveillance. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24(1):1–7.
Chitra T, Sushanth YS, Raghavan S. Umbilical coiling index as a marker of perinatal outcome: an analytical study. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012;2012:213689.
Rana J, Faridi MM, Sharma N. Umbilical coiling index: a marker of fetal distress and abnormality. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008;34(3):313–317.
Ercal T, Lacin S, Altunyurt S, Saygili U, Cinar O. Umbilical coiling index: is it a marker for the fetus at risk? Br J Clin Pract. 1996;50(5):254–256.
.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
