Predicting HDR Competency in Human Embryos via Transcriptomic Profiling of DNA Repair Pathways

Authors

  • Deborah Serena

Keywords:

Homology-directed repair (HDR), non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), genome editing, CRISPR-Cas9, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), human blastocyst, embryonic genome activation (EGA),, DNA repair pathways, transcriptomic profiling, epiblast (EPI

Abstract

Genome editing in early human embryos holds transformative potential but remains limited by the cell’s natural tendency to repair DNA breaks using error-prone pathways like non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). In contrast, homology-directed repair (HDR)—required for precise genome editing—is less efficient and poorly characterized in embryonic contexts. In this study, a computational analysis of publicly available single-cell RNA-sequencing data (GSE66507) from 30 human blastocyst cells to profile the transcriptional activity of DNA repair genes is performed. The key players in NHEJ (e.g., XRCC6, XRCC4) and HDR (e.g., RAD51, BRCA1) across three embryonic lineages: trophectoderm (TE), epiblast (EPI), and primitive endoderm (PE) are examined. The results show that NHEJ-related genes are consistently expressed across all cells, suggesting a default repair mechanism during preimplantation development. HDR genes, on the other hand, show greater variability and are selectively enriched in EPI cells—pointing to a potential transcriptional window of increased HDR activity following embryonic genome activation (EGA). Principal component analysis (PCA) further confirms lineage-specific clustering driven by repair gene expression. These findings highlight how transcriptional profiling can offer valuable clues about repair pathway preferences in early embryos—and guide genome editing strategies toward higher precision and efficiency

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Petropoulos, S., et al. (2016). Single-cell RNA-seq reveals lineage and transcriptional diversity in human preimplantation embryos.Cell, 165(4), 1012–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.014

Yan, L., et al. (2013). Single-cell RNA-Seq profiling of human preimplantation embryos and embryonic stem cells.Nature Biotechnology, 31(8), 652–658. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2660

Blakeley, P., et al. (2015). Defining the three cell lineages of the human blastocyst by single-cell RNA-seq.Development, 142(18), 3151–3165. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.123547

Kim, D., et al. (2017). Genome editing reveals a role for OCT4 in human embryogenesis.Nature, 550, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24033

Wells, D., Vermeesch, J. R., & Simpson, J. L. (2019). Gene editing should replace embryo selection following PGD.Prenatal Diagnosis, 39(7), 545–552. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5469

Szymanska, K. J., et al. (2024). The role of declining ATM function in oocyte aging.Cell Death & Disease, 15, 171. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-024-02041-z

Zhang, Y., et al. (2019). Enhancing CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing by manipulating chromatin accessibility.Cell Reports, 26(7), 1875–1887.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.054

Gao, Y., et al. (2018). Enhancing homology-directed genome editing by modulating DNA repair pathway choice.Nature Methods, 15, 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-018-0092-0

DeWitt, M. A., et al. (2016). Selection-free genome editing of the sickle mutation in human adult hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells.Nature Biotechnology, 34(3), 320–328. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3462

Downloads

Published

2025-04-25

How to Cite

1.
Serena D. Predicting HDR Competency in Human Embryos via Transcriptomic Profiling of DNA Repair Pathways. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Apr.25 [cited 2025Sep.20];14(16S):975-9. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/4629