Knowledge Attitude and Practice Survey on The Various Impression Techniques for Custom Made Post Among Specialist and Dental Practitioners
Keywords:
core, Eco friendly, impression technique, root, innovative technology, post, root canalAbstract
Introduction: A post and core crown is a form of dental restoration used when there isn't enough healthy tooth tissue left to support a traditional crown. A post is cemented into a prepared root canal to hold a core repair and the final crown in place. The advantage of putting a post into a root canal is that the crown is more likely to remain in place.
Materials and method: A well-structured questionnaire comprising 13 questions covering the socio-demographic information, knowledge, attitude, perception was framed, administered and circulated to college students through an online survey link. The sample size was 100 undergraduate students and postgraduate students. The questions were carefully studied and the corresponding answers were marked by the participants.
Result: Survey on the various impression techniques for custom made post’s gave the result as 53% of the population wall between the age group of 25-30 years, 27% of the population between the age group of 20-25 years and the rest were about 30 years. Among the total population 59% preferred composite resin 30% preferred GIC where the rest preferred amalgam as the core foundation. Chi square test shows p value as 0.037 ( p< 0.05). Hence it is statistically significant.
Conclusion: In conclusion, it was evident that the majority of the participants were aware of the impression materials used and practiced it in their daily practice. Most of them stated the use of a prefabricated post system made of composite resin or ceramic materials necessitates root canal preparation to the post's size and shape. And most of the practitioners preferred composite resin as core foundation
Downloads
Metrics
References
Dejak B, Młotkowski A. Strength comparison of anterior teeth restored with ceramic endocrowns vs custom-made post and cores. J Prosthodont Res 2018;62(2):171–6.
Cagidiaco MC, García-Godoy F, Vichi A, Grandini S, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Placement of fiber prefabricated or custom made posts affects the 3-year survival of endodontically treated premolars. Am J Dent 2008;21(3):179–84.
Four-year survival of endodontically treated premolars restored with fiber posts [Internet]. British Dental Journal2014;217(2):79–79. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.624
Tan PLB, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, Stanford CM, Tan SC, Johnson WT, et al. In vitro fracture resistance of endodontically treated central incisors with varying ferrule heights and configurations [Internet]. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry2005;93(4):331–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.01.013
Naumann M, Blankenstein F, Dietrich T. Survival of glass fibre reinforced composite post restorations after 2 years-an observational clinical study. J Dent 2005;33(4):305–12.
Awad MA. Custom-Made Post and Core - Part I: Technique to Fabricate Direct Custom-Made Post with Resin Pattern [Internet]. Journal of Dental Health, Oral Disorders & Therapy2014;1(3). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.15406/jdhodt.2014.01.00013
Deger S, Akgüngör G, Caniklioglu B. An alternative method for fabricating a custom-made metal post with a ceramic core. Dent Traumatol 2005;21(3):179–82.
Geary JL, Kinirons MJ. Post thermoforming dimensional changes of ethylene vinyl acetate used in custom-made mouthguards for trauma prevention – a pilot study [Internet]. Dental Traumatology2008;24(3):350–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2007.00550.x
Schwartz R, Robbins J. Post Placement and Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Literature Review [Internet]. Journal of Endodontics2004;30(5):289–301. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200405000-00001
Thejeswar EPT. Educational Research -iPad System vs Textbook System [Internet]. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology; Raipur volume2015;8(8):1158–60. Available from: https://search.proquest.com/openview/d14e9aab038e831b33b3a3d266af69d1/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1096441
Krishna RN, Nivesh Krishna R, Yuvaraj Babu K. Estimation of stature from physiognomic facial length and morphological facial length [Internet]. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology2016;9(11):2071. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2016.00423.6
Sriram N, Thenmozhi, Yuvaraj S. Effects of Mobile Phone Radiation on Brain: A questionnaire based study. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2015;8(7):867.
Subashri A, Thenmozhi MS. Occipital Emissary Foramina in Human Adult Skull and Their Clinical Implications [Internet]. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology2016;9(6):716. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2016.00135.9
Menon A, Thenmozhi MS. Correlation between thyroid function and obesity. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2016;9(10):1568.
Rubika J, Felicita AS, Sivambiga V. Gonial angle as an indicator for the Prediction of Growth Pattern. World J Dent 2015;6(3):161–3.
Anbu RT, Suresh V, Gounder R, Kannan A. Comparison of the Efficacy of Three Different Bone Regeneration Materials: An Animal Study. Eur J Dent 2019;13(1):22–8.
Nandhini JST, Thaslima Nandhini JS, Yuvaraj Babu K, Mohanraj KG. Size, Shape, Prominence and Localization of Gerdy’s Tubercle in Dry Human Tibial Bones [Internet]. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology2018;11(8):3604. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2018.00663.7
Avinash K, Malaippan S, Dooraiswamy JN. Methods of Isolation and Characterization of Stem Cells from Different Regions of Oral Cavity Using Markers: A Systematic Review. Int J Stem Cells 2017;10(1):12–20.
Pratha AA, Thenmozhi MS. A study of occurrence and morphometric analysis on meningo orbital foramen. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2016;9(7):880–2.
Muthukrishnan S, Krishnaswamy H, Thanikodi S, Sundaresan D, Venkatraman V. Support vector machine for modelling and simulation of Heat exchangers. Thermal Science 2020;24(1 Part B):499–503.
Nandhini NT, Rajeshkumar S, Mythili S. The possible mechanism of eco-friendly synthesized nanoparticles on hazardous dyes degradation. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 2019;19:101138.
Ezhilarasan D. Oxidative stress is bane in chronic liver diseases: Clinical and experimental perspective. Arab J Gastroenterol 2018;19(2):56–64.
Rajagopal R, Padmanabhan S, Gnanamani J. A comparison of shear bond strength and debonding characteristics of conventional, moisture-insensitive, and self-etching primers in vitro. Angle Orthod 2004;74(2):264–8.
Neelakantan P, Sharma S, Shemesh H, Wesselink PR. Influence of Irrigation Sequence on the Adhesion of Root Canal Sealers to Dentin: A Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy and Push-out Bond Strength Analysis. J Endod 2015;41(7):1108–11.
Sahu D, Kannan GM, Vijayaraghavan R. Carbon black particle exhibits size dependent toxicity in human monocytes. Int J Inflam 2014;2014:827019.
Jose J, P. A, Subbaiyan H. Different Treatment Modalities followed by Dental Practitioners for Ellis Class 2 Fracture – A Questionnaire-based Survey [Internet]. The Open Dentistry Journal2020;14(1):59–65. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210602014010059
Wu F, Zhu J, Li G, Wang J, Veeraraghavan VP, Mohan SK, et al. Biologically synthesized green gold nanoparticles from Siberian ginseng induce growth-inhibitory effect on melanoma cells (B16) [Internet]. Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology2019;47(1):3297–305. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21691401.2019.1647224
Dua K, Wadhwa R, Singhvi G, Rapalli V, Shukla SD, Shastri MD, et al. The potential of siRNA based drug delivery in respiratory disorders: Recent advances and progress. Drug Dev Res 2019;80(6):714–30.
Patil SB, Durairaj D, Suresh Kumar G, Karthikeyan D, Pradeep D. Comparison of Extended Nasolabial Flap Versus Buccal Fat Pad Graft in the Surgical Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Prospective Pilot Study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2017;16(3):312–21.
Olin PS, Holtan JR, Breitbach RS, Rudney JD. The effects of sterilization on addition silicone impressions in custom and stock metal trays [Internet]. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry1994;71(6):625–30. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90449-9
Wee AG. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions [Internet]. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry2000;83(3):323–31. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(00)70136-3
Pereira JR, Valle AL do, Shiratori FK, Ghizoni JS, Melo MP de. Influence of intraradicular post and crown ferrule on the fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth. Braz Dent J 2009;20(4):297–302.
Zogheib LV, Pereira JR, do Valle AL, de Oliveira JA, Pegoraro LF. Fracture resistance of weakened roots restored with composite resin and glass fiber post. Braz Dent J 2008;19(4):329–33.
Valle AL do, do Valle AL, Pereira JR, Shiratori FK, Pegoraro LF, Gerson B. Comparison of the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with prefabricated posts and composite resin cores with different post lenghts [Internet]. Journal of Applied Oral Science2007;15(1):29–32. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1678-77572007000100007
...
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
