Assessment of Motor Components in Relation to Structural and Functional Impairments in Individuals with Stroke

Authors

  • Suraj Kanase
  • Anubha Aranake
  • Tanishqa Coutinho
  • Manoj Ambali
  • Shrirang Patil

Keywords:

Modified Ashworth scale, EMG, Stroke, Motor impairments, Structural and Functional impairments

Abstract

Background: Stroke often causes motor impairments like spasticity, weakness, and poor coordination, impacting functional independence. This study used Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and Electromyography (EMG) to assess neuromuscular dysfunction, providing insights into post-stroke motor deficits and structural and functional impairments secondary to stroke.

Methodology:  A total of 30 participants were selected based on the inclusion criteria. The study being an observational type the participants were analysed for wrist flexor spasticity with modified Ashworth scale [MAS] and electromyography [EMG].

Analysis:The selected outcome measures were analysed based on their reliability, validity, and clinical relevance. The relationship between motor impairments (muscle weakness, spasticity, coordination deficits) and structural-functional brain damage (corticospinal tract lesions, impaired neural connectivity) was examined. The effectiveness of these tools in capturing motor recovery and functional improvements was assessed.

Results:Findings indicate a strong correlation between structural damage and motor impairments, with corticospinal tract lesions significantly affecting voluntary movement. Functional deficits, including impaired strength, power and mean amplitude were effectively captured through standardized assessments. The outcome measures demonstrated high reliability in tracking motor functional impairments due to structural impairments giving a positive correlation between MAS scores and EMG duration and negative correlation betweenMAS scores and EMG amplitude

Conclusion: Standardized motor assessments are essential for evaluating structural and functional impairments in stroke survivors. Their integration into clinical practice enhances rehabilitation planning and patient outcomes. Future research should focus on refining these tools for more precise evaluation of motor recovery

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Feigin VL, Murray CJL, Stark B, Johnson C, Roth G, Bisignano C, et al. Global burden of stroke and risk factors in 2020 and projections to 2050. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(10):795-820. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0

Coutinho T, Kanase S, Varadharajulu G. Current physiotherapy evidences for various gait training interventions for knee hyperextension among post stroke survivors- A systematic review. SEEJPH.2025 Jan. Doi: 10.70135/seejph.vi.3903

Hankey GJ. Stroke: Causes, Consequences, and Prevention.Lancet. 2017;389(10069):641-654. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30962-X

Cramer SC, Wolf SL, Adams HP Jr, Chen D, Dromerick AW, Dunning K, et al. Stroke recovery and rehabilitation research: Issues, opportunities, and the NIH StrokeNet. Stroke. 2017;48(3):813-819. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015501

Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, Langhorne P, Mead GE, Mehrholz J, van Wijck F. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(11):CD010820. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010820.pub2

Bernhardt J, Hayward KS, Kwakkel G, Ward NS, Wolf SL, Borschmann K, et al. Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research. Int J Stroke. 2017;12(5):444-450. DOI: 10.1177/1747493017706231

Kwakkel G, Kollen B, van der Grond HJ, Prevo AJ. Predicting motor recovery after stroke: Systematic review of clinical tests. Lancet Neurol. 2003;2(8):528-537. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00462-3.DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00568-7

Schaechter JD. Motor rehabilitation and brain plasticity after hemiparetic stroke.ProgNeurobiol. 2004;73(1):61-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.04.001

Lang CE, Wagner JM, Dromerick AW, Edwards DF. Measurement of upper-extremity function early after stroke: Properties of the Action Research Arm Test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(12):1605-1610.DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.09.003

Warlow C, van Gijn J, Dennis M, Wardlaw J, Bamford J, Hankey G, et al.Stroke: Practical Management. 3rd ed. Blackwell Publishing; 2008.ISBN: 9781405127660

Luft AR, McCombe-Waller S, Whitall J, Forrester LW, Macko RF, Sorkin JD, et al. Brain activity rises with rehabilitation in chronic stroke. Stroke. 2004;35(2):502-507. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000110980.16523.92

Nudo RJ. Recovery after brain injury: Mechanisms and principles.Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:887. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00887

Dancause N, Lang CE, Wolf SL, Cohen LG, Kwakkel G, Ward NS, et al. Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after stroke: A view from the cortex. HandbClin Neurol. 2013;110:129-144.DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52901-5.00011-4

Ward NS. Restoring brain function after stroke: Bridging the gap between animals and humans.Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(8):620-630. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30168-4

Dobkin BH. Strategies for stroke rehabilitation.Lancet Neurol. 2004;3(9):528-536. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00851-8

Stinear CM, Ward NS, Cohen LG, Kwakkel G, Wolf SL, Cramer SC. Biomarkers for predicting motor recovery after stroke: A systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26(8):701-710.DOI: 10.1177/1545968312441719

Platz T, Eickhof C, Nuyens G, Vuadens P. Clinical scales for the assessment of spasticity, associated phenomena, and function: A systematic review of the literature. DisabilRehabil. 2005;27(12):718-728.DOI: 10.1080/09638280400018509

Li S, Francisco GE. New insights into the pathophysiology of post-stroke spasticity. Front HumNeurosci. 2015 April 10:9:192. Doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00192

Pandyan AD,Gregoric M, Barnes MP, Wood D, Wijck FV, Burridge, et al. Spasticity: clinical perceptions, neurological realities, and meaningful measurement. DisabilRehabil. 2005 Jan;27(1-2):2-6. Doi: 10.1080/09638280400014576

Steele KM, Papazain C, Feldner HA. Muscle Activity After Stroke: Perspectives on Deploying Surface Electromyography in Acute Care. Front Neurol 2020 Sept Volume 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.576757

Gracies JM. Pathophysiology of spastic paresis. II: Emergence of muscle overactivity. Muscle Nerve. 2005 May; 31950: 552-571. Doi: 10.1002/mus.20285

Clark DJ, Patten C, Reid KF, Carabello RJ, Phillips EM, Fielding RA. Impaired voluntary neuromuscular activation limits muscle power in mobility-limited older adults.J Gerontol A BiolSci Med Sci2010 May;65(5):495-502. Doi: 10.1093/gerona/glq012

Kwah LK, Herbert RD, Harvey LA, Diong J, ClarkeJl, Martin JH, et al. Passive mechanical properties of gastrocnemius muscle-tendon units after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 July. Volume 93, Issue 7, 1185-1190.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.02.009

Bohannon RW. Muscle strength and muscle training after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2007 Jan ;39(1):14-20. Doi: 10.2340/16501977-0018

.....

Downloads

Published

2025-05-05

How to Cite

1.
Kanase S, Aranake A, Coutinho T, Ambali M, Patil S. Assessment of Motor Components in Relation to Structural and Functional Impairments in Individuals with Stroke. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025May5 [cited 2025Oct.7];14(20S):616-21. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/5097

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 20S (2025): Journal of Neonatal Surgery

Section

Original Article

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

Terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.