Ultrasound Parameters Of Hip Displasya In Children Under One Year Old

Authors

  • Bobur Furkatovich Shirov
  • Gulshad Mamatmuradovna Mardieva

Keywords:

hip dysplasia, developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), infant hip ultrasound, alpha angle, beta angle, Graf classification, femoral head coverage, pediatric orthopedics, early screening, neonatal diagnostics

Abstract

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a prevalent pediatric orthopedic condition characterized by abnormal development of the hip joint, ranging from mild instability to complete dislocation. Early diagnosis and intervention are critical for preventing long-term functional limitations, gait abnormalities, and degenerative joint diseases. In recent decades, ultrasonography has emerged as the primary diagnostic modality for screening and evaluating hip development in infants, particularly those under one year of age, due to its non-invasive nature, lack of radiation, and ability to visualize cartilaginous structures.

This study aims to comprehensively examine the key ultrasound parameters that aid in diagnosing hip dysplasia in children less than 12 months old. Utilizing Graf’s classification system—the most widely accepted sonographic method for evaluating infant hips—we focused on measuring the alpha and beta angles, which reflect the bony roof and cartilaginous coverage of the acetabulum, respectively. Additionally, the percentage of femoral head coverage and hip joint morphology were assessed to establish a correlation between sonographic findings and clinical risk factors such as breech presentation, family history, and female sex.

A prospective analysis was conducted on 150 infants (85 females and 65 males) between the ages of 0 and 12 months who were referred for hip screening at a pediatric diagnostic center. All patients underwent bilateral hip ultrasonography performed by experienced sonographers trained in the Graf technique. Results were categorized according to the Graf classification (types I to IV), with particular attention paid to borderline cases (type IIa and IIb), which require close monitoring and potential early intervention.

The findings revealed that alpha angle measurement remains the most reliable indicator of hip maturity, with a value ≥60° considered normal (type I). In contrast, beta angles and femoral head coverage percentages showed variation in borderline and dysplastic hips. Notably, a higher prevalence of type IIb and IIc hips was observed in female infants and those with positive family history. Follow-up scans confirmed the utility of serial ultrasound in monitoring hip development and guiding treatment decisions, such as the application of the Pavlik harness.

Our results support the implementation of universal or targeted ultrasound screening protocols in early infancy to identify and manage DDH effectively. Furthermore, the study underscores the importance of training healthcare providers in accurate ultrasound technique and interpretation to reduce misdiagnosis and improve outcomes.

In conclusion, ultrasonography remains an essential tool in the early detection and classification of hip dysplasia in infants. The use of standardized parameters such as alpha and beta angles, alongside thorough clinical evaluation, can significantly improve the prognosis of affected children. Timely intervention based on precise sonographic findings ensures normal hip joint development and prevents future orthopedic complications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Graf, R. (1984). The diagnosis of congenital hip-joint dislocation by the ultrasonic combi-technique. Archives of Orthopaedic and Traumatic Surgery, 102(4), 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00451922

Rosendahl, K., Toma, P., & Graf, R. (2007). Ultrasound in the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants (DDH). European Radiology, 17(8), 1960–1967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0445-5

American Academy of Pediatrics. (2000). Clinical practice guideline: Early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Pediatrics, 105(4), 896–905. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.105.4.896

Laborie, L. B., Lehmann, T. G., Engesæter, I. Ø., Rosendahl, K. (2013). Prevalence of radiographic hip dysplasia at 6 months in a population-based cohort of Norwegian infants. Pediatric Radiology, 43(6), 681–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2615-1

Shipman, S. A., Helfand, M., Moyer, V. A., & Yawn, B. P. (2006). Screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip: A systematic literature review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Pediatrics, 117(3), e557–e576. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-1597

Clarke, N. M. P. (2014). Current concepts in developmental dysplasia of the hip. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British), 96-B(12), 1572–1579. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B12.33752

Harcke, H. T., Grissom, L. E. (1994). Sonographic evaluation of congenital hip dysplasia. Radiologic Clinics of North America, 32(1), 129–141.

Mulpuri, K., Song, K. M., Goldberg, M. J., & Sevarino, K. (2015). Detection and nonoperative management of pediatric developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants up to six months of age: A clinical practice guideline. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 23(3), 202–205. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00459

Downloads

Published

2025-05-14

How to Cite

1.
Shirov BF, Mardieva GM. Ultrasound Parameters Of Hip Displasya In Children Under One Year Old. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025 May 14 [cited 2025 Dec. 13];14(23S):770-3. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/5812

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.