Assessment of Efficacy Of Four Different Types Of Bristle Designs Of Tooth Brush On Plaque And Gingival Status: A Cross Over Randomized Control Trial.

Authors

  • Dhaman Gupta
  • Tanvi Dosi
  • Neha Hissariya
  • Gauri Vijayvargiya
  • Shantanu Sontakke

Keywords:

Dental Plaque, Gingivitis, Periodontitis, Volunteers

Abstract

Backgrounds: Improper maintenance of oral hygiene can result in accumulation of dental plaque which can lead to gingivitis and periodontitis. Study aimed to compare the effect of four different bristle designs of tooth brush on plaque and gingival status.

Methods: A cross over randomized clinical trial was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of four different types of toothbrush. The toothbrushes used were flat trim, Bi-level, Zig Zag and Wavy. The study was carried out over a period of four months. A total of 160 volunteers were taken as the study subjects. These subjects were randomly allocated into 4 groups.  Each group comprised of 40 study subjects. All the subjects were assessed for gingival and plaque status using gingival and plaque index at the end of week 1, week 2 and week 3 from baseline score. A wash out period of seven days was allowed between the study periods and then cross over among the study groups were performed. Student’s paired t-test was applied to see the change in variables with respect to time and one way ANOVA followed by post-hoc test were used for multiple group comparison. Statistical significance was defined at P<0.05.

Results: Statistically significant difference was found in both plaque and gingival score from baseline to 4 months in all the groups. Zigzag toothbrush design was found to be superior in reduction of plaque and gingival score followed by wavy, bi-bevel and flat trim tooth brush design.

Conclusion: Zigzag and wavy tooth brush designs found to be most effective than other tooth brush designs and can be recommended at the community level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Reddy V.C., Ashok Kumar B.R. and Ankola A. Relationship between Gingivitis and Anterior Teeth Irregularities Among 18 to 26 Years Age Group: A Hospital Based Study in Belgaum, Karnataka. J Oral Health Comm Dent 2010; 4:61-66

Briner WW. Plaque in relation to dental caries and periodontal disease. Int Dent J 1971; 21:293-301.

Jenkins GN. Current concepts concerning the development of dental caries. Int Dent J 1972; 22:350-362.

Sripriya N,Shaikh Hyder Ali K. H.A. Comparative study of the efficacy of four different bristle designs of tooth brushes in plaque removal. J Indian Soc PedodPrev Dent 2007; 25:76-81.

Loef H, Theilade E, Jensen SB. Experimental gingivitis in man. J Periodontol 1965; 36:177-87.

Dr. Pramod Yadav, Dr.SabysachiSaha, Dr.Sanjay Singh, Dr. Minti Kumari ,Dr.ShafaatMohd. , Dr. Ridhi Narang. International journal of oral health research and review.2013; 1:68-76.

Quigley G A & Hein J W. Comparative cleansing efficiency of manual and power brushing. Journal of American Dental Association 1962; 65: 26–29.

Turesky S, Gilmore N D & Glickman I. Reduced plaque formation by the chloromethyl analogue of Victamine C. Journal of Periodontology 1970; 41: 41–43.

Löe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. Acta OdontolScand 1963; 21: 533-51.

Claydon N, Addy M. Comparative single use plaque removal study by toothbrushes of different designs. J Clin Periodontol 1996; 23:1112-6.

Addy M. Measuring success in toothbrush design- An opinion and debate of concepts. Int Dent J 1998;48:509-18

Abou El-Yazeed M, Ezzat A, El-Dokky N, El-MansyM. Assessment of Various Technologies of Toothbrushes in Plaque Removal and Gingival Enhancement. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 2012, 8: 5033-5038.

Mary, A. and W. Paul. The Oral-B Cross Action Manual Toothbrush: A 5-Year Literature Review. J Can Dent Assoc., 72: 323-331.

Terezhalmy GT, Bsoul SA, Bartizek RD, Biesbrock AR. Plaque removal efficacy of a prototype manual toothbrush versus an ADA Reference Manual toothbrush with and without dental floss. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2005;6:1-13

Ashley P. Toothbrushing: why, when and how? Dent Update. 2001; 28:36-40.

McCracken GI, Janssen J, Swan M, Steen N, de Jager M, Heasman PA. Effect of brushing force and time on plaque removal using a powered toothbrush. J Clin Periodontol. 2003; 30:409-13.

Frandsen A. Mechanical oral hygiene practices: state-of-thescience review. In: Loe H, Kleinman DV, editors. Dental plaque control measures and oral hygiene practices. Oxford: IRL Press; 1986. p. 93-116.

Brothwell DJ, Jutai DKG, Hawkins RJ. An update of mechanical oral hygiene practices: evidence-based recommendations for disease prevention. J Can Dent Assoc. 1998; 64:295-306.

Van der Weijden GA, Timmerman MF, Danser MM, Van der Velden U. Relationship between the plaque removal efficacy of a manual toothbrush and brushing force. J Clin Periodontol. 1998; 25: 413-16.

Van der Weijden GA, Timmerman MF, Reijerse E, Snoek CM, Van der Velden U. Toothbrushing force in relation to plaque removal. J Clin Periodontol. 1996;23:724

Frandsen A. Mechanical oral hygiene practices. In: Loe H, KleinmanM, editors. Dental plaque control measures and oral hygiene practices. 1st ed. DVIRL Press: Oxford; 1986. p. 93-116.

Jepsen S. Role of manual toothbrushes in effective plaque control: Advantages and limitations. In: Lang NP, Attstrom R, Loe H, editors. Proceedings of European workshop on Mechanical plaque control.1st ed. Quintessence Publishing: Illinois; 1983. p. 121-37.

Bay I, Kardel KM, Skougaard MR. Quantitative evaluation of plaque removal ability of different types of toothbrushes. J Periodontol 1967; 38:52633.

Cohen MM. A pilot study testing the plaque-removing ability of a newly invented toothbrush. J Periodontol 1973; 44:183-7.

Bergenholz A. Mechanical cleaning in oral hygiene. In: Frandsen A, editor. Oral hygiene. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1972. p.27-60.

Keiser J, Groeneveld H. A clinical evaluation of a novel toothbrush design. J Clin Periodontol 1997; 24:419-23.

Turner PS, Surveyor AB, Newcombe RG, et al. A Clinical comparision of plaque removal study using 8 branded toothbrushes. J Clin periodontal 2002; 29:310-6.

Kaker A, Kaker RC, Kaker K, etal. Plaque Removing efficacy of a new design toothbrush with Zig-Zag bristle arrangement. J Indian Dent Assc 2002; 73:29-34.

Dentino AR, Derderian G, Wolf MA. Six-month comparison of powered verses manual Tooth brushing for safety and Efficacy in the absence of Professional Instruction in mechanical Plaque Control. J Periodontol 2002; 42: 770-8.

Tirapelli/José Camila Ferreira de Carvalho/José Paulo Ribas/HeitorPanzeric. Dental plaque removal efficacy of Three toothbrushes with different designs: A Comparative Analysis oral health Prev dent. 2006; 4:105-11.

Bergenholtz A, Gustafsson LB, Segerlund N, Hagberg C, Ostby N. Role of brushing technique and toothbrush design in plaque removal. Scan J Dent Res 1984; 92:344-51.

Staudt CB, Kinzel S, Habfeld S, Stein W, Stachle HJ, Dorfer CE. Computer based intra-oral image analysis of the clinical plaque removing capacity of three manual toothbrushes. J Clin Periodontol 2001; 28:746-52.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-15

How to Cite

1.
Gupta D, Dosi T, Hissariya N, Vijayvargiya G, Sontakke S. Assessment of Efficacy Of Four Different Types Of Bristle Designs Of Tooth Brush On Plaque And Gingival Status: A Cross Over Randomized Control Trial. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025May15 [cited 2025Sep.21];14(24S):211-20. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/5926

Most read articles by the same author(s)