Multilateral Trade Law at a Crossroads: Legal Perspectives on WTO Reforms and Institutional Resilience or Multilateral Trade Law at a Crossroads: WTO Reform, Pandemic Lessons, and Legal Resilience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i22S.5990Keywords:
WTO reforms, Dispute Settlement, plurilateral agreements, Special And Differential Treatment, trade governance, MC13, nternational Trade Law, digital trade, TRIPS waiver, Tariff tensionsAbstract
The World Trade Organization (WTO) has long functioned as the central forum for global trade governance. However, in recent years, its efficacy has been increasingly questioned, particularly with the paralysis of its Appellate Body. This paper critically examines the institutional deficiencies of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Mechanism (DSM), the rise of plurilateral negotiations, and contentious debates surrounding special and differential treatment. The analysis draws on recent ministerial outcomes, including those from the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13), and recent developments such as the resurgence of tariff-based trade conflicts involving the United States. The study argues for a comprehensive and inclusive reform agenda, emphasizing procedural functionality, legitimacy, and adaptability to evolving trade dynamics.
Research Methodology
This study employs a qualitative legal analysis combined with a policy-based approach. Primary sources include WTO ministerial declarations, official documents, and agreements, particularly outcomes from the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13). Secondary sources encompass peer-reviewed journal articles, institutional policy briefs, and reports from global economic organizations. The research critically evaluates the legal structure of WTO mechanisms, interprets member positions on reform, and identifies systemic challenges through a combination of doctrinal analysis and comparative assessment. This methodology provides both normative insights and contextual understanding of evolving multilateral trade dynamics.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Akman, M. S., Berger, A., Botti, F., Draper, P., Freytag, A., Padoan, P. C., and Schumucker, C. (2020, December). The Need for WTO Reform: Where to Start in Governing World Trade?
Bacchus, J. (2018, May 8). Was Buenos Aires the Beginning of the End or the End of the Beginning?: The Future of the World Trade Organization, CATO Institute (841).
Baldwin, R. (2022). The Great Trade Collapse and WTO’s Future. VoxEU.org.
Bown, C. P., & Keynes, S. (2020). Why the WTO Dispute Settlement System Matters. Peterson Institute for International Economics.
European Commission. (2023). EU Proposal on WTO Reform: A Strategic Vision. Brussels: Directorate-General for Trade.
Evenett, S. J., & Fritz, J. (2023). Global Trade Alert: Monitoring Protectionism in the Pandemic Era. CEPR Press.
Gaskins, William Crowder Jr. (2021). Exhaustion requirements and dispute resolution reform in bilateral investment treaties. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 49(2), 371-406.
Hoekman, B. (2021). Revitalizing Multilateral Trade Governance: The Road Ahead. Journal of International Economic Law, 24(3), 567–593.
Howse, R. (2022). The Limits of the WTO. AJIL Unbound, 116, 41–45. doi:10.1017/aju.2022.5
Howse, R., & Langille, J. (2023). Continuity and Change in the World Trade Organization: Pluralism Past, Present, and Future. American Journal of International Law, 117(1), 1–47. doi:10.1017/ajil.2022.82
Linscott, M. (2021, March 17). For WTO reform, most roads lead to China. But do the solutions lead away? Atlantic Council.
Pan, K. (2025). Breaking the Impasse of Appointing Members of the WTO Appellate Body: A Perspective from International Institutional Law. World Trade Review, 1–19. doi:10.1017/S1474745624000648
South Centre. (2023). TRIPS Waiver Debate: What Is at Stake? Geneva: South Centre Policy Brief.
Stewart, T. P. (2019, November 4). WTO's Appellate Body Reforms the Draft General Council Decision on Functioning of the Appellate Body. Washington International Trade Association.
Thomas, C. (2022). Introduction to the Symposium on Joost Pauwelyn and Krzysztof Pelc, “Who Guards the ‘Guardians of the System’? The Role of the Secretariat in WTO Dispute Settlement.” AJIL Unbound, 116, 367–372. doi:10.1017/aju.2022.64
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2023). Digital Economy Report: Cross-border Data Flows and Development.
United States Trade Representative (USTR). (2019). Memorandum on Reforming Developing Country Status in the WTO. Retrieved from https://ustr.gov
Wolff, A. W. (2021, May 14). Creating a Broad Waiver of WTO IP Rights During the Pandemic; Peterson Institute for International Economics.
World Trade Organization. (2024). Outcome Document of the 13th WTO Ministerial Conference (MC13). Retrieved from https://www.wto.org
WTO Secretariat. (2022). The WTO and Sustainable Development: Progress and Challenges. Geneva: WTO Publications.
Zheng, J., Zhou, S., Li, X., Padula, A. D., & Martin, W. (2023). Effects of Eliminating the US–China Trade Dispute Tariffs. World Trade Review, 22(2), 212–231. doi:10.1017/S1474745622000271
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
