Development And Evaluation Of Matrix Type Transdermal Patches Of Donepezil

Authors

  • Ishat Kamal Vachhal
  • Sisir Nandi

Keywords:

Donepezil, Transdermal Drug Delivery System (TDDS), Matrix Patch,, Controlled Release, Polymers, Franz Diffusion, In-vitro Evaluation, Drug Release Kinetics

Abstract

The present study focuses on the formulation and evaluation of matrix-type transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDS) of Donepezil, a drug commonly used in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. TDDS offers numerous advantages over traditional drug delivery systems, including controlled release, improved patient compliance, and avoidance of first-pass metabolism. In this study, ten different transdermal patch formulations of Donepezil were developed using the solvent evaporation method with various combinations of polymers such as HPMC, ethyl cellulose, chitosan, and PVP K30. Preformulation studies, including melting point, solubility analysis, partition coefficient determination, and FTIR spectroscopy, were conducted to assess the drug’s physical and chemical properties and compatibility with selected excipients. The patches were characterized for physicochemical properties such as thickness, weight uniformity, folding endurance, moisture content, drug content, and water vapor transmission rate (WVTR). In-vitro drug release studies were conducted using Franz diffusion cells and UV spectroscopy, and release kinetics were evaluated. Among the formulations, patch P4 exhibited the highest drug release (71.28%) over 7 hours and was found to be stable under accelerated stability conditions. Release kinetics followed the Korsmeyer-Peppas model, indicating a diffusion-controlled mechanism. The study concludes that the matrix-type TDDS of Donepezil, especially formulation P4, demonstrates potential for sustained drug release and improved therapeutic efficacy in treating cognitive disorders.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ghosh, T.K. et al. (1996) Development of a transdermal patch of methadone: in vitro

evaluation across hairless mouse and human cadaver skin. Pharm. Dev.Technol. 1, 285–291.

Kunal N patel, Hetal K patel, Vishnu A patel. Formulation and characterization of drug in adhesive transdermal patches of diclofenac acid. Int. J. Pharma.and Pharma Sci. 2012; 4(1):296-299.

Arnab Bagchi, Biplab Kumar Dey. Formulation, In-vitro Evaluations and Skin Irritation Study of Losartan Potassium Transdermal Patches. Ir. J. Pharma. Sci. 2010; 6(3): 163-170.

Jayaprakash S, Ramkanth S, Anitha P. Design and evaluation of monolithic drug-in-adhesive transdermal patches of Meloxicam. Malaysian J. Pharma. Sci. 2010; 8(2):25–34.

Raju.R.Thenge,Krodhi.G.Mahajan,Harigopal.S.Sa warkar,Purushottam.S.Gangane. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal drug delivery system for lercanidipine hydrochloride. Int. J.Pharm. Tech. Res. 2010; 2(1):253-258.

Mohit Soni,Sandeep Kumar and G.D. Gupta. Transdermal Drug Delivery: A Novel Approach to Skin Permeation. J. Pharma. Res. 2009; 2(8);1184-1190.

V.Kusum Devi, S. Saisivam, G. R. Maria, and P. U. Deepti. Design and Evaluation of Matrix Diffusion Controlled Transdermal Patches of Verapamil Hydrochloride. Drug dev and Ind pharma. 2003; 29,(5):495–503.

Nauman Rahim Khan, Gul Majid Khan, Abdur Rahim Khan, Abdul Wahab. Formulation, physical, in vitro and ex vivo evaluation of diclofenac diethylamine matrix patches containing turpentine oil as penetration enhancer. Afr. J. Pharma and Pharmacol. 2012; 6(6):434-439.

Ashu Mittal, Udai vir singh sara, Asgar ali.Formulation and evaluation of monolithic matrix polymer films for transdermal delivery of nitrendipine. Acta. Pharm. 2009; 59: 383–393.

Kusum DV, Saisivam S, Maria GR, Deepti PU. Design and evaluation of matrix diffusion controlled transdermal patches of verapamil hydrochloride, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2003;29:495–503.

Limpongsa E, Umprayn K. Preparation and evaluation of diltiazem hydrochloride diffusioncontrolled transdermal delivery system. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2008;9(2):464-70.

Sakellariou P, Rowe RC, White EFT. An evaluation of the interaction and plasticizing

efficiency of the polyethylene glycols in ethyl cellulose and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose films using the torsional braid pendulum. Int. J.Pharm.1986;31:55–64.

Costa P, Ferreria DC, Morgado R, Sousa Lobo JM. Design and evaluation of a lorazepam transdermal delivery system, Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1997; 23: 939-944.

Dimas DA, Dalles PP, Rekkas DD, Choulis NH. Effect of several factors on the mechanical properties of pressure sensitive adhesives used in transdermal therapeutic systems, AAPS PharmSciTech. 2000; 1: E16.

Gabiga H, Cal K, Janicki S. Effect of penetration enhancers on isosorbide dinitrate penetration through rat skin from a transdermal therapeutic system, Int J Pharm. 2000; 199: 1-6.

Godbey KJ. Improving patient comfort with nonocclusive transdermal backings, American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists. 1996; 1-2.

Ho KY, Dodou K. Rheological studies on pressure sensitive adhesives and drug in adhesive layers as a means to characterize adhesive performance, Int J Pharm. 2007; 333: 24-33.

Izumoto T, Aioi A, Uenoyana S, Kariyama K, Azuma M. Relationship between the transference of drug from a transdermal patch and physicochemical properties, Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 1992; 40: 456-458.

Gaur KP, Mishra S, Purohit S and Dave K:Transdermal delivery System: A review. Asian journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research 2009; 2(1):14-20.

Soni Mohit, Kumar Sandeep and Gupta Dr.GD: Transdermal drug delivery: A novel approach to skin permeation. Journal of Pharmacy Research 2009; 2(8):1184-1190.

Naik Aarti, Yogeshvar N, Kalia Guy and Richard Guy H: Transdermal Drug Delivery:

overcoming the skin’s barrier function 2009; 3(9):318-326.

Arunachalam A, Karthikeyan, Vinay Kumar D, Prathap M, Sethuraman S, Ashutosh Kumar S and Manidipa S: Transdermal Drug Delivery System: A review. Current Pharma Research 2010; 1(1):70-81.

Amnuaikit C, Ikeuchi I, Ogawara K, Higaki K, Kimura T. Skin permeation of propranolol from polymeric film containing terpene enhancers for transdermal use, Int. J. Pharm. 2005; 289:167– 178.

Verma PRP, Iyer SS. Transdermal delivery of propranolol using mixed grades of Eudragit: design and in-vitro and in vivo evaluation. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2000;26: 471–476.

Devi VK, Saisivam S, Maria GR, Deepti PU. Design and evaluation of matrix diffusion

controlled transdermal patches of verapamil hydrochloride, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm.2003;

:495–503.

Miles JA, Hanumanthu BK, Patel K, Chen M, Siegel RM, Kokkinidis DG (June 2019). "Torsemide versus furosemide and intermediate-term outcomes in patients with heart failure: an updated meta-analysis". J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 20 (6): 379–388.

Wargo KA, Banta WM (November 2009). "A comprehensive review of the loop diuretics: should furosemide be first line?". Ann Pharmacother. 43 (11): 1836–47.

Dunn CJ, Fitton A, Brogden RN (January 1995). "Torasemide. An update of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy". Drugs. 49 (1): 121–42.

Durriya Hashmat, Muhammad Harris Shoaib, Fatima Ramzan Ali, Fahad Siddiqui. Lornoxicam controlled release transdermal gel patch: Design, characterization and optimization using co-solvents as penetration enhancers. PLOS ONE February 27, 2020

B Raja Narender. Formulation and Evaluation of Physostigmine-Transdermal Patch. World Journal of Current Med and Pharm Research., Vol-II, Iss-II, 125-132.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-19

How to Cite

1.
Kamal Vachhal I, Nandi S. Development And Evaluation Of Matrix Type Transdermal Patches Of Donepezil. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025May19 [cited 2025Sep.11];14(25S):169-83. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/6099