Fabrication And In Vitro Evaluation of Buccal Mucoadhesive Tablet of Antihypertensive Drug

Authors

  • Purva Madhukar Ghumre
  • Shyam Suryakant Awate
  • Sanjay R. Arote

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i25S.6179

Keywords:

Fabrication, In Vitro Evaluation, Buccal Mucoadhesive, Tablet, and Antihypertensive Drug

Abstract

The buccal route offers excellent opportunities and potential advantages for systemic drug delivery as compared to per-oral administration. The present study involves designing, developing, and optimizing the buccal tablet formulation of Carvedilol (CA) by using the QbD approach. The Carvedilol buccal tablets were prepared using the dry granulation method. Based on the DoE, the composition of the optimized formulation of CA BT consists of 20 mg of CA, 10 mg Carbopol 934p, 17.75 mg HPMC K100, 15 mg Chitosan, 30 mg PVP K-30, 1 mg Magnesium stearate, 15.25 mg Mannitol, 1 mg Aspartame, and 50 mg Ethyl cellulose. The optimized formulation of CA BT 18 was found to have a mucoadhesive strength of 22.28±0.35 g, a swelling index of 79.35 ± 0.35%, and drug release was sustained up to 10th h, compared to the marketed product, the release was up to 8h. The drug release kinetics were best explained by the Korsmeyer Peppas plot, which demonstrates drug release by stress-induced swelling and slow erosion from the polymer. An attempt was made to design a buccal tablet of Carvedilol individually for sustained drug release in the treatment of hypertension. The formulation can be given in case of a patient who cannot take medication orally, in trauma, and unconscious patients. The development of a new pharmaceutical product is very time-consuming, extremely costly, and high-risk, with very little chance of a successful outcome. Hence, in the study already marketed drug product Carvedilol was chosen as a buccal drug delivery system by a novel approach using QbD tools to target the quality product accurately.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Abruzzo, A., Cerchiara, T., Bigucci, F., Gallucci, M. C., & Luppi, B. (2015). Mucoadhesive buccal tablets based on chitosan/gelatin microparticles for delivery of propranolol hydrochloride. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 104(12), 4365-4372.

Choi, H. G., & Kim, C. K. (2015). Development of omeprazole buccal adhesive tablets with stability enhancement in human saliva. Journal of controlled release, 68(3), 397-404.

Bahri-Najafi, R., Rezaei, Z., Peykanpour, M., Shabab, L., Solooki, R., & Akbari, P. (2018). Formulation of nicotine mucoadhesive tablet for smoking cessation and evaluation of its pharmaceuticals properties. Advanced Biomedical Research, 2(1), 88.

Çelik, B., Özdemir, S., Barla Demirkoz, A., & Üner, M. (2017). Optimization of Piribedil mucoadhesive tablets for efficient therapy of Parkinson’s disease: physical characterization and ex vivo drug permeation through buccal mucosa. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 43(11), 1836-1845.

Kadam, P. B., Dias, R. J., Mali, K. K., Havaldar, V. D., & Mahajan, N. S. (2018). Formulation and evaluation of buccoadhesive tablets of atenolol. J Pharm Res, 1(2), 193-199.

Gaikwad, S. S., Thombre, S. K., Kale, Y. K., Gondkar, S. B., & Darekar, A. B. (2015). Design and in vitro characterization of buccoadhesive tablets of timolol maleate. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 40(5), 680-690.

Daswadkar, S. C., Roy, M. A., Walode, S. G., & Kumar, M. C. (2016). Quality by design approach for the development and validation of saxagliptin by RP-HPLC with application to formulated forms. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 7(4), 1670.

Grewal, P., Mundlia, J., & Ahuja, M. (2019). Thiol modified Moringa gum–A potential bioadhesive polymer. Carbohydrate polymers, 209, 400-408.

Hassan, N., Khar, R. K., Ali, M., & Ali, J. (2019). Development and evaluation of buccal bioadhesive tablet of an anti-emetic agent ondansetron. Aaps PharmaSciTech, 10, 1085-1092.

Kalaichelvi, R., & Jayachandran, E. (2021). Validated spectroscopic method for estimation of saxagliptin in pure and from tablet formulation. Int J Pharm Sci, 3(3), 179-180.

Shirsand, S. B., Suresh, S., Keshavshetti, G. G., Swamy, P. V., & Reddy, P. V. P. (2017). Formulation and optimization of mucoadhesive bilayer buccal tablets of atenolol using simplex design method. International journal of pharmaceutical investigation, 2(1), 34.

Iswariya, V. T., Babu, V. L., & Avanapu, S. R. (2015). Formulation and evaluation of oro dispersive tablets of saxagliptin. Int. J. Pharm. Sci Rev. Res. January—Febr, 30(2), 42.

El-Nahas, A. E., Allam, A. N., & El-Kamel, A. H. (2017). Mucoadhesive buccal tablets containing silymarin Eudragit-loaded nanoparticles: formulation, characterization and ex vivo permeation. Journal of microencapsulation, 34(5), 463-474.

Onishi, H., Yumoto, K., & Sakata, O. (2015). Preparation and evaluation of Ritodrine buccal tablets for rational therapeutic use. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 468(1-2), 207-213.

Moghimipour, E., Aghel, N., & Adelpour, A. (2022). Formulation and characterization of oral mucoadhesive chlorhexidine tablets using Cordia myxa mucilage. Jundishapur journal of natural pharmaceutical products, 7(4), 129.

Acholu, P. K., Yajaman, S., & Jayaveera, K. N. (2015). Formulation and In-vitro evaluation of novel buccal mucoadhesive tablets of Felodipine. The International Research Journal of Pharmacy, 5(11), 14-19.

Munasur, A. P., Pillay, V., Chetty, D. J., & Govender, T. (2016). Statistical optimisation of the mucoadhesivity and characterization of multipolymeric propranolol matrices for buccal therapy. International journal of pharmaceutics, 323(1-2), 43-51.

Kumar, B. P., Kavitha, P., & Devi, K. J. (2024). Formulation design and evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal tablets of nitroglycerin. Int J Pharm Sci, 6(7), 251-9.

.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-20

How to Cite

1.
Ghumre PM, Suryakant Awate S, R. Arote S. Fabrication And In Vitro Evaluation of Buccal Mucoadhesive Tablet of Antihypertensive Drug. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025May20 [cited 2025Sep.25];14(25S):750-65. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/6179