Developing And Validating Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Pedagogical Competency Scale
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i26S.6259Keywords:
Pedagogical Competency, Mathematics Education, Middle School Mathematics Teachers, Teacher Assessment, Tool Development, Reliability, ValidityAbstract
This study aims to design, develop, and validate a comprehensive measuring tool to assess the pedagogical competencies of middle school mathematics teachers. Acknowledging the important role of mathematics education in promoting cognitive development, critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and logical reasoning, this study examines the need for effective teaching methods during the significant middle school years (grades 6 to 8) and therefore, the need for a standardized assessment tool. The research followed a structured process for developing the tool including a comprehensive literature review and insights from experts, followed by item generation, pilot testing, and thorough statistical validation. The first draft of the Mathematics Teachers’ Pedagogical Competency Scale (MTPCS) consisted of 90 items, which were adjusted to 80 items after expert review. These items were classified into eight key dimensions of pedagogical competency: (1) Conceptual Understanding and Core Knowledge, (2) Different Teaching Methods and Multidisciplinary Approach, (3) Understanding Different Types of Learners, (4) Mathematics Assessment, (5) Use of Teaching-Learning Resources, (6) Use of Technology, (7) Growth Mindset, and (8) Classroom Management. A total sample of 186 mathematics teachers from different schools in Delhi took part in the pilot testing of the tool. Item analysis was done with the help of t-values, which detected and removed items with weak discriminatory power, leading to a final tool consisting of 55 items. The tool was found to be highly reliable (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.94) and valid, establishing it as a robust instrument to measure the teachers’ pedagogical competencies. This research adds to the domain of teacher education by providing a standardized tool for assessing and enhancing the teaching practices of middle school mathematics teachers.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2014). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Pearson Education.
Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2011). Building a common core for learning to teach and connecting professional learning to practice. American Educator, 35(2), 17-21.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407.
Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students' potential through creative math, inspiring messages, and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291-309.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics 23 step by step: A simple guide and reference (14th ed.). Routledge.
Grootenboer, P., & Marshman, M. (2016). Mathematics, affect and learning: Middle school students' beliefs and attitudes about mathematics education. Springer.
Gutiérrez, R. (2018). The need to rehumanize mathematics. In I. Goffney & R. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Rehumanizing mathematics for Black, Indigenous, and Latinx students (pp. 1-10). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. NCTM.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
