To Evaluate the Tooth Size -p-622-632

Authors

  • Prajakta Gayakwad
  • Shirish Goel
  • Pradeep Babu Kommi
  • Tanuj Choudhari
  • Mohit Kathole
  • Shivam Gabale

Keywords:

Tooth size discrepancy, Bolton’s ratio, Arch length, Arch width, Malocclusion, Central India population

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate and compare tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among Class I, Class II Div I, Class II Div II and Class III malocclusion groups in the Central India population.

Materials and Methods: The study included 160 subjects (aged 13–15 years) evenly divided among Class I, Class II Division I, Class II Division II, and Class III malocclusion groups. Mesiodistal tooth width, Bolton’s ratios, arch length, and arch width were measured using standardized orthodontic methods.

Results: Statistically significant differences were observed across malocclusion groups in certain parameters, highlighting the need for population-specific diagnostic norms.

Conclusion: These findings provide valuable insight into tooth-arch relationships within the Central India population and underscore the importance of individual diagnostic assessment in orthodontic planning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bolton WA. The clinical application of a tooth-size analysis. Am J Orthod. 1962;48(7):504–29.

Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 5th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2012.

McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC, Trevisi HJ. Systemized Orthodontic Treatment Mechanics. 1st ed. Mosby; 2001.

Lavelle CLB. Maxillary and mandibular tooth size in different racial groups and in different occlusal categories. Am J Orthod. 1972;61(1):29–37.

Smith SS, Buschang PH, Watanabe E. Interarch tooth size relationships of 3 populations: “Does Bolton’s analysis apply?” Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117(2):169–74.

Santoro M, Ayoub ME, Pardi VA, Cangialosi TJ. Mesiodistal crown dimensions and tooth size discrepancy of the permanent dentition of Dominican Americans. Angle Orthod. 2000;70(4):303–7.

Araujo E, Souki M. Bolton anterior tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Angle Orthod. 2003;73(3):307–13.

Uysal T, Sari Z, Basciftci FA, Memili B. Intermaxillary tooth size discrepancy and malocclusion: a population-based study. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27(1):1–5.

Smith RJ, Bailit HL. Tooth size, dental crowding, and arch size in the University School of Dentistry sample. Am J Orthod. 1977;72(3):256–61.

Othman S, Harradine N. Tooth size discrepancies in an orthodontic population. Angle Orthod. 2007;77(4):668–74.

Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Abdallah EM, Garcia AF. Comparisons of mesiodistal and buccolingual crown dimensions of the permanent teeth in three populations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;96(5):416–22.

Moyers RE. Handbook of Orthodontics. 4th ed. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1988.

Strujic M, Milutinovic J, Nikolic P, Nikolic D. Arch width, arch length and tooth size in subjects with Class II Division 1 and Class III malocclusions. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2013;70(6):555–60.

Crosby DR, Alexander CG. The occurrence of tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Am J Orthod. 1989;95(6):457–61.

Al-Tamimi T, Hashim HA. Bolton tooth-size ratio revisited. World J Orthod. 2005;6(3):289–95.

Nie Q, Lin J. Comparison of intermaxillary tooth size discrepancy among different malocclusion groups. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116(5):539–44.

Bernabe E, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Tooth-width ratio discrepancies in a sample of Peruvian adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;125(3):361–5.

Al-Omari IK, Duaibis RB, Al-Bitar ZB. A comparison of tooth size and arch dimensions in Class I and Class II malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(4):706–11.

Othman S, Harradine N. Tooth size discrepancy and Bolton’s ratios: A literature review. J Orthod. 2006;33(1):45–51.

Ta TA, Ling JY, Hägg U. Tooth-size discrepancies among different occlusion groups of southern Chinese children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120(5):556–8.

Al-Khateeb SN, Abu Alhaija ES. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian population. Angle Orthod. 2006;76(4):672–8.

Endo T, Abe R, Kuroki H, Shimooka S. Tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusions in a Japanese orthodontic population. Angle Orthod. 2008;78(6):994–9.

Bernabe E, Villanueva KM, Flores-Mir C. Tooth width ratios in crowded and non-crowded dentitions. Angle Orthod. 2004;74(6):765–8.

Johe RS, Steinhart T, Artun J. Intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies in orthodontically referred populations. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(3):558–63.

Basaran G, Selek M, Hamamci O. Maxillary and mandibular arch width, arch length, and tooth size in Class I and Class II division 1 subjects. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29(6):528–34.

Lombardo L, Fattori L, Gorgun O, Mucedero M, Siciliani G. Tooth-size discrepancy: A comparison between manual and digital methods. Eur J Orthod. 2021;43(1):48–53.

Alkofide E, Alnamankani E. Tooth-size discrepancy among different malocclusion groups: A comparative study. J Orthod Sci. 2017;6(4):118–22.

Akyalcin S, Heravi F, Ramalingam S, English JD. Evaluation of Bolton tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Angle Orthod. 2014;84(5):794–800.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-22

How to Cite

1.
Gayakwad P, Goel S, Kommi PB, Choudhari T, Kathole M, Gabale S. To Evaluate the Tooth Size -p-622-632. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025May22 [cited 2025Oct.23];14(26S):622-3. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/6325