Correlation of Modified CT Severity Index with Clinical Outcomes in Acute Pancreatitis: A Prospective Study
Keywords:
ICU Admission, Local and Systemic Complications,, Modified CT Severity Index, Acute PancreatitisAbstract
Introduction and Objectives: Acute pancreatitis is known for its unpredictable course and is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Approximately 20 to 30 percent of individuals with acute pancreatitis develop severe cases, which are characterized by prolonged pancreatic necrosis, multiple organ failure, and a complicated clinical course. The Modified Computed Tomography Severity Index (MCTSI) is used as a rating system for assessing the severity of acute pancreatitis. This study aims to compare patient outcomes based on the MCTSI grading system, focusing on factors such as mortality, length of hospital stay, duration of ICU stay, complications, and organ failure.
Materials and methods: Over one year, a prospective study was conducted involving 50 cases diagnosed with acute pancreatitis. Computed tomography (CECT) with contrast enhancement was performed on these individuals.
Results: A correlation was identified between the overall length of hospital stay and several factors, including the necessity for ICU admission, the duration of ICU stay, and the severity of pancreatitis. Additionally, a higher CT grade is positively associated with the occurrence of both systemic and local complications..
Conclusion: There is a significant correlation between the modified CT severity index grading system and the need for ICU admission, the duration of ICU stay, and the overall length of hospital stay. The modified CT severity index can also predict the likelihood of developing both local and systemic complications, as well as the need for ICU admission..
Downloads
Metrics
References
Sarr MG. Acute pancreatitis: a century of progress. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90(4):875–84.
Vege SS, Yadav D, Chari ST. Pancreatitis in the 21st century—research challenges and opportunities. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(6):1494–503.
Leppu00e4niemi A, Tolonen M, Tarasconi A, Segovia-Lohse H, Pupelis G, Jeekel J, et al. The role of CT imaging in predicting the severity and outcome of acute pancreatitis: a systematic review. Pancreatology. 2020;20(6):1048–56.
Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt J, Vege SS. American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(9):1400–15.
Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62(1):102–11.
Garg PK, Tandon RK. Survey on chronic pancreatitis in the Asia-Pacific region. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;19(9):998–1004.
Mounzer R, Langmead CJ, Wu BU, Evans AC, Bishehsari F, Muddana V, et al. Comparison of existing clinical scoring systems to predict persistent organ failure in patients with acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(7):1476–82.
Sahu S, Chacko A, John M, Jeyaseelan L, Chandy GM, Thomas K. Predictors of mortality in acute pancreatitis in a developing country: a retrospective study. Pancreatology. 2020;20(3):383–8.
Bollen TL, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, van Es HW, Banks PA, Gooszen HG. The Atlanta Classification of acute pancreatitis revisited. Br J Surg. 2011;98(4):411–22.
Johnson CD, Besselink MG, Carter R. Acute pancreatitis. BMJ. 2014;349:g4859.
Singh VK, Wu BU, Bollen TL, Repas K, Maurer R, Johannes RS, et al. A prospective evaluation of the Revised Atlanta Criteria for severity stratification in acute pancreatitis. Gut. 2017;66(1):115–21.
Papachristou GI, Muddana V, Yadav D, O'Connell M, Sanders MK, Slivka A, et al. Comparison of BISAP, Ransonu2019s, APACHE-II, and CTSI scores in predicting organ failure, complications, and mortality in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(2):435–41
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.