Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit in CAD/CAM-Fabricated Indirect Restorations
Keywords:
RESIN COMPOSITE, LITHIUM DISILICATE, RESIN CEMENT, INDIRECT RESTORATIONSAbstract
Objectives: This study investigated the effect of marginal adaptation and internal fit of premolar teeth restored with indirect overlays, fabricated from different CAD/CAM materials (lithium-disilicate and composite blocks).
Materials and Methods: Twenty-two intact premolars with standardized concave chamfer overlay preparation were divided into two groups (n= 18) Group (A): lithium disilicate blocks and Group (B): composite blocks. All groups cemented with dual cured resin cement. After 24h of storage at 37°C followed by thermocycling. Marginal gap evaluation evaluated using a stereomicroscope at x50 magnification at 4 points at each surface. Specimens were then sectioned mesiodistally to assess internal fit. Statistical analysis was performed using student t-test at p<0.05.
Results: Composite blocks showed higher but statistically similar marginal and internal gap mean values.
Conclusions: Using composite blocks in fabrication of overlay restorations provided comparable marginal and internal gap results to lithium disilicate blocks.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Abo El-Farag S, El Nawawy M. Fracture resistance of different esthetic partial coverage restorations. Egypt Dent J. 2019;65(1):599–609.
Ionescu AC, Hahnel S, König A, Brambilla E. Resin composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications reduce biofilm formation in vitro. Dent Mater. 2020 May;36(5):603–16.
Mainjot AK, Dupont NM, Oudkerk JC, Dewael TY, Sadoun MJ. From Artisanal to CAD-CAM Blocks: State of the Art of Indirect Composites. J Dent Res. 2016;95(5):487–95.
Emam Z, A. Aleem N. Influence of Different Materials and Preparation Designs on Marginal Adaptation and Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Fabricated Occlusal Veneers. Egypt Dent J. 2020;66(1):439–52.
Gopal. CAD-CAM and all ceramic restorations, current trends and emerging technologies: A review. Int J Orofac Res. 2017;2(2):40.
Kavut İ, Uğur M, Tanrıkut O, Tanrıkut ÖO. Evaluation of The Adhesion of Different CAD/CAM Materials with Self Etch/Adhesive Resin Cements. IOSR J Dent Med Sci e-ISSN. 2019;18(2):51–4.
Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res. 2014;93(12):1232–4.
Lawson NC, Bansal R, Burgess JO. Wear, strength, modulus and hardness of CAD/CAM restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2016 Nov;32(11):e275–83.
Alamoush RA, Silikas N, Salim NA, Al-Nasrawi S, Satterthwaite JD. Effect of the Composition of CAD/CAM Composite Blocks on Mechanical Properties. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018.
Veljovi T. Dental Resin-Based Luting Materials — Review. 2023;1–21.
Colpani JT, Borba M, Della Bona Á. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic crown copings. Dent Mater. 2013 Feb;29(2):174–80.
Lima FF, Neto CF, Rubo JH, Santos GC, Moraes Coelho Santos MJ. Marginal adaptation of CAD-CAM onlays: Influence of preparation design and impression technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Sep;120(3):396–402.
Hasan Mohammed Z, Majeed MA. Effect of Cementation Protocol on the Marginal Adaptation of Indirect Overlay Restorations Fabricated from Two Different All-Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials. J Res Med Dent Sci |. 2020;8(7).
Thainimit I, Totiam P, Wayakanon K. Fracture resistance of remaining buccal cusps in maxillary premolar ceramic onlay restorations. Oper Dent. 2020;45(4):624–31.
Demirci M, Tuncer S, Yuceokur AA. Prevalence of Caries on Individual Tooth Surfaces and its Distribution by Age and Gender in University Clinic Patients. Eur J Dent. 2010;04(03):270–9.
Akbar JH, Petrie CS, Walker MP, Williams K, Eick JD. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs. J Prosthodont. 2006;15(3):155–63.
Baig MR, Tan KBC, Nicholls JI. Evaluation of the marginal fit of a zirconia ceramic computer-aided machined (CAM) crown system. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;104(4):216–27.
Höland W, Rheinberger V, Apel E, Van’t Hoen C, Höland M, Dommann A, et al. Clinical applications of glass-ceramics in dentistry. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006;17(11):1037–42.
Marchesi G, Piloni AC, Nicolin V, Turco G, Di Lenarda R. Chairside cad/cam materials: Current trends of clinical uses. Biology (Basel). 2021;10(11).
Alayad AS, AlDabeeb DS, Algoblan GM, Aldawsari MH, Alghamdi RA, Alqahtani SM. Flexural Strength of Recently Advanced Lithium Disilicate Glass-ceramic CEREC Tessera: An In-vitro Study. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2024;21–4.
Rickman LJ, Padipatvuthikul P, Chee B. Clinical applications of preheated hybrid resin composite. Br Dent J. 2011;211(2):63–7.
Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Cengiz E, Ongun S, Karakaya I. The Effect of Surface Treatments on the Mechanical and Optical Behaviors of CAD/CAM Restorative Materials. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(2):e496–503.
El Ghoul WA, Özcan M, Ounsi H, Tohme H, Salameh Z. Effect of different CAD-CAM materials on the marginal and internal adaptation of endocrown restorations: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2020;123(1):128–34. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.024
Alghazzawi TF, Liu PR, Essig ME. The Effect of Different Fabrication Steps on the Marginal Adaptation of Two Types of Glass-Infiltrated Ceramic Crown Copings Fabricated by CAD/CAM Technology. J Prosthodont. 2012;21(3):167–72.
Anadioti E, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, Holloway JA, Denry IL, Thomas GW, et al. Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Apr;113(4):304–9.
Roy AK, Mohan D, Sunith M, Mandokar RB, Suprasidh S, Rajan S. Comparison of shear bond strengths of conventional resin cement and self-adhesive resin cement bonded to lithium disilicate: An in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017;18(10):881–6.
Moshaverinia A. Review of the Modern Dental Ceramic Restorative Materials for Esthetic Dentistry in the Minimally Invasive Age. Dent Clin North Am. 2020 Oct;64(4):621–31.
Goujat A, Abouelleil H, Colon P, Jeannin C, Pradelle N, Seux D, et al. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM inlay/onlay restorations: A systematic review of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(4):590-597.e3.
Souza J, Fuentes M aV, Baena E, Ceballos L. One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays. Odontology. 2021;109(1):259–70.
Tribst JPM, Piva AMDOD, Penteado MM, Borges ALS, Bottino MA. Influence of ceramic material, thickness of restoration and cement layer on stress distribution of occlusal veneers. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32(November):1–10.
Neppelenbroek KH. The clinical challenge of achieving marginal adaptation in direct and indirect restorations. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015;23(5):448–9.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
