Safety and Efficacy of Different Approaches for Catheter Ablation of Para-Hisian Accessory Pathway

Authors

  • Ahmed El-Damaty
  • Mahmoud Ahmed Mahmoud Maarek
  • Ahmed Shaaban Ali
  • Yasser Ahmed Abdel hady

Keywords:

Catheter Ablation, Para-Hisian Accessory Pathway

Abstract

Background and purpose: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is recognized as a final treatment for atrioventricular accessory pathways (AP).  In experienced centers, the success rate of accessory pathways ablation exceeds ninety-five percent accompanied by a low rate of complications.  To investigate the outcomes from various methods for radiofrequency ablation of para-Hisian AP regarding efficacy and safety.

Patients and Methods: This observational analytical study included patients who had RF catheter ablation for a para-hisian AP at Kasr Al-Ainy University hospital and Beni-Suef University hospital EP lab over a period of 24 months from January 2020 to January 2022. Patients were enrolled prospectively and retrospectively through chart review. Forty-five patients had a para-hisian AP that have been successfully ablated thorough different approaches.

Results: Retrograde AVN Wencbach cycle length (AVN WCL) was significantly increased in post ablation compared by pre ablation in the three studied groups with a statistically significant p-values (p-value <0.001).

Conclusion: With accurate and careful mapping, it is relatively safe to ablate para-hisian accessory pathways. if probable, proper extension of ablation duration may diminish the recurrence rate of para-Hisian accessory pathways. The majority of para-Hisian APs may be effectively and safely ablated via iIVC-A, but ablation in the NCC or SVC is neither an early nor a preferred technique. The degree of local ventriculo-atrial fusion in the para-Hisian region throughout retrograde atrioventricular accessory pathways conduction may predict or distinguish the successful ablation location.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Payami B, Shafiee A, Shahrzad M, et al. Posteroseptal accessory pathway in association with coronary sinus diverticulum: electrocardiographic description and result of catheter ablation. J Intervent Card Electrophysiol., 2013; 38: 43e9.

Benson DW, Cohen MI. Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome lessons learnt and lessons remaining. Cardiol Young 2017; 27: S62e7.

Campos B, Viñolas X, Guerra G, et al. Location of Accessory Pathways in WPW: What and How Should We Ablate. In Cardiac Arrhythmias. Springer, London; 469-487.

Wieczorek M, Tajtaraghi S, Hoeltgen R, et al. A subvalvular catheter approach for radiofrequency ablation of right-sided accessory pathways. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2019; 56(1): 29-36

Gist KM, Bockoven JR, Lane J, et al. Acute success of cryoablation of left‐ sided accessory pathways: A single institution study. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2009; 20(6): 637-642.

Izumi G, Yokoshiki H, Takeda A. Retrograde sharp potential resembling the his-bundle electrogram: is this a case of atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia involving twin atrioventricular nodes with the anterior node exhibiting only retrograde conduction. Cardiology in the Young, 2020; 30(12): 1940-1194.

Olgun H, Karagoz T, Celiker A. Coronary microcatheter mapping of coronary arteries during radiofrequency ablation in children. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2010; 27: 75-79.

Konstantinos PL, Michael E, Konstantinos V, et al. Catheter ablation of anteroseptal accessory pathways from the aortic cusps: A case series and a review of the literature. Journal of Arrhythmia. 2016; 32(6): 443-448.

Hrvojka MZ, Arthur Y. Catheter inversion technique for ablation of parahisian accessory pathway. EP Europace. 2015; 17(11): 17-23.

Josep B, Marti P, Llui’s M, et al. Radiofrequency Ablation of Anteroseptal, Para-Hisian, and Mid-Septal Accessory Pathways Using a Simplified Femoral Approach. PACE. 1998; 21(4): 735-41.

World Medical Association (2013). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects". JAMA. 310 (20): 2191–2194. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281053.

Pang, Yang, et al. "A new insight into the different approaches for the ablation of para-Hisian accessory pathways: safety, effectiveness, and mechanism." Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 66.2 (2023): 427-433

Choker MO, de Moura LG, Scanavacca MI. Catheter ablation of the parahisian accessory pathways from the aortic cusps-Experience of 20 cases-Improving the mapping strategy for better results. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2020; 31(6): 1413-1419.

Xu G, Liu T, Liu E, Ye L, Shehata M, Wang X et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation at the non-coronary cusp for the treatment of para-hisian accessory pathways. Europace. 2015 Jun;17(6):962-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu271. Epub 2014 Oct 29. PMID: 25355782.

Liang M, Wang Z, Liang Y, et al. Different approaches for catheter ablation of para-Hisian accessory pathways: implications for mapping and ablation. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 2017; 10(6): e004882.

Krishnappa S, Rachaiah JM, Hegde S, et al. High Risk Parahisian Pathways-Mid Septal and Anteroseptal: Feasibility, Advantages, Safety and Outcomes of Alternate Site Approach–A Single Centre Study. Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research. 2018; 9(2): 376-384

Chai C, Sun Q, Guo XG, Yang JD, Xie HY, Ma J et al. Safety and efficacy of catheter ablation of para-Hisian accessory pathway via a direct superior vena cava approach: A multicenter study. Clin Cardiol. 2024 Jan;47(1): e24180. doi: 10.1002/clc.24180. Epub 2023 Oct 27. PMID: 37889106; PMCID: PMC10766120.

Chen Q, Xu L, Zou T, et al. Six-Year Follow-Up Outcomes of Catheter Ablation of Para-Hisian Accessory Pathways. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2021; 8: 692945.

Yang JD, Sun Q, Guo XG, et al. Focal atrial tachycardias from the parahisian region: Strategies for mapping and catheter ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2017; 14(9): 1344-1350.

Brugada J, Blom N, Sarquella-Brugada G, et al. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapy for arrhythmias in the pediatric population: EHRA and AEPC-Arrhythmia Working Group joint consensus statement. Europace. 2013; 15(9): 1337-1382.

Ghanma IM. Outcomes of Cardiac-Physiologic Studies at Queen Alia Heart Institute. A Three-Year Experience. JRMS. 2017 Dec 24(3): 30-33.

Jastrzębski M, Moskal P, Pitak M, et al. Contemporary outcomes of catheter ablation of accessory pathways: complications and learning curve. Polish Heart Journal (Kardiologia Polska). 2017; 75(8): 804-10.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-02

How to Cite

1.
El-Damaty A, Mahmoud Maarek MA, Shaaban Ali A, Abdel hady YA. Safety and Efficacy of Different Approaches for Catheter Ablation of Para-Hisian Accessory Pathway. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Jun.2 [cited 2025Sep.18];14(30S):358-65. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/6975