Enhancement of Transdermal Absorption of drugs via Phonophoresis and TENS: An in vitro Study

Authors

  • Roopika Sabharwal
  • Amandeep Singh
  • Nitin Kumar Saluja
  • Thakur Gurjeet Singh
  • Debarshi Ghosh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i8.7138

Keywords:

Neuromusculoskeletal Pain, Phonophoresis, TENS, Transdermal Drug Delivery, Franz Diffusion Cell, Ultrasound Therapy

Abstract

Background: Neuromusculoskeletal pain is a complex condition often requiring multifaceted approaches for effective management. Gabapentin is frequently prescribed for such conditions due to its ability to modulate nerve transmission. However, systemic administration may lead to significant side effects. Enhancing transdermal drug delivery via non-invasive modalities presents a novel strategy for local pain control with minimized systemic risks.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of Phonophoresis (ultrasound-assisted) and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)-assisted techniques in enhancing transdermal drug absorption using an in vitro model, to support their application in pain management.

Methods: A 5% gel formulation of gabapentin was prepared using Carbopol 934, ethanol, and standard gelling agents. Hairless mouse skin was used for the in vitro permeation study using Franz diffusion cells. Three intervention arms were tested: (1) Control (topical gabapentin only), (2) Phonophoresis with ultrasound (1 MHz and 3 MHz), and (3) TENS at varying frequencies (50 Hz, 100 Hz, 150 Hz). For Phonophoresis, ultrasound was applied in pulsed mode at intensities of 0.8 and 1.0 W/cm² for 5 minutes. For TENS, stimulation was provided using a trapezoidal sweep pattern for 10 minutes. Samples were collected at 0, 1, 2, and 3 hours and analyzed using HPLC.

Results: The 1 MHz, 1.0 W/cm² Phonophoresis condition resulted in the highest permeation (35.0 ± 2.3 µg/cm² at 3 hours), followed by TENS at 150 Hz (30.0 ± 1.8 µg/cm²), and then control (12.0 ± 1.2 µg/cm²). Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed between all groups via ANOVA. Drug permeation was time-dependent and enhanced markedly by both active methods compared to passive application.

Discussion: Ultrasound at 1 MHz penetrates deeper tissues, aligning well with the needs of neuromusculoskeletal pain management. The mechanical and thermal effects of ultrasound, such as cavitation and acoustic streaming, likely contributed to enhanced permeability. Although 3 MHz ultrasound is generally preferred for superficial applications, this study confirms the benefit of 1 MHz for deeper tissue targeting. TENS demonstrated moderate but meaningful enhancement in drug permeation, likely through improved local circulation and neural modulation. These findings reinforce the rationale for using 1 MHz Phonophoresis for pain control.

Limitations include the use of hairless mouse skin instead of human samples, and the lack of long-term retention or penetration depth analysis. Future work should explore in vivo validation and examine therapeutic outcomes on pain scores and functional recovery.

Conclusion: This study confirms that Phonophoresis using 1 MHz ultrasound significantly enhances transdermal drug delivery, outperforming both TENS and control groups. These findings support the integration of ultrasound-assisted transdermal therapy in physiotherapeutic pain management regimens. Further clinical research is warranted.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Baron R. Mechanisms of disease: neuropathic pain. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2006;2(2):95–106.

Backonja MM. Use of anticonvulsants for treatment of neuropathic pain. Curr Pharm Des. 2001;7(5):451–64.

Dworkin RH et al. Pharmacologic management of neuropathic pain: evidence-based recommendations. Pain. 2007;132(3):237–51.

Nair AB, Shah J. Role of transdermal drug delivery system in pain management. Curr Drug Ther. 2020;15(2):121–133.

Mitragotri S. Innovation—device-mediated transdermal drug delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8(1):99–110.

Banga AK. Transdermal and Intradermal Delivery of Therapeutic Agents. CRC Press; 2011.

Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(11):1261–8.

Finnin BC, Morgan TM. Transdermal penetration. J Pharm Sci. 1999;88(10):955–8.

Aggarwal S et al. Formulation and evaluation of topical gel of gabapentin. Int J Curr Pharm Res. 2015;7(1):40–3.

Wester RC et al. In vitro percutaneous absorption of model compounds using human cadaver skin. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1993;20(1):65–70.

Kim MJ et al. Evaluation of in vitro skin permeation of gabapentin. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2017;43(10):1670–7.

Polat BE, Blankschtein D, Langer R. Ultrasound-mediated transdermal drug delivery: mechanisms, scope, and emerging trends. J Control Release. 2011;152(3):330–48.

Jain A et al. HPLC method for estimation of gabapentin in transdermal formulations. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2012;2(6):123–6.

Kapoor D et al. Quantitative analysis of gabapentin using RP-HPLC method. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2015;7(4):405–9.

Rani S et al. Development and validation of HPLC method for gabapentin analysis. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2016;7(9):3777–83.

Petrofsky JS et al. Effect of ultrasound on skin permeability. Med Sci Monit. 2008;14(3):CR112–6.

Draper DO et al. Therapeutic ultrasound and its application in sports medicine. Sports Med. 1995;20(1):17–26.

Baker KG et al. A review of therapeutic ultrasound: biophysical effects. Phys Ther Sport. 2001;2(3):135–49.

Ferreira CL et al. Influence of TENS on blood flow and skin temperature. Braz J Phys Ther. 2015;19(1):35–42.

Johnson MI. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Pain Relief: Past, Present and Future. Pain Rev. 2014;1(2):91–6.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-06

How to Cite

1.
Sabharwal R, Singh A, Saluja NK, Singh TG, Ghosh D. Enhancement of Transdermal Absorption of drugs via Phonophoresis and TENS: An in vitro Study. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Jun.6 [cited 2025Oct.2];14(8):290-4. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/7138