Minimally Invasive Combined Aortic and Mitral Valve Surgeries via Upper Ministernotomy
Keywords:
Mitral valve, aortic valve, minimally invasive, double valve surgeryAbstract
Background: A minimally invasive cardiac surgery gained a wide acceptance worldwide with comparable results to conventional surgery through full median sternotomy. There is now extension of minimally invasive techniques to involve more complex procedures such as combined aortic and mitral valve surgeries.
Patients and methods: In this study we present two groups of patients receiving combined aortic and mitral valve surgeries in the period between October 2022 and January 2024 at Cairo University as well other hospitals. Group A included 30 patients that were operated upon through upper ministernotomy while group B included 30 patients that were operated upon via full median sternotomy. Both groups were matched according to propensity matching scoring system build upon preoperative patient characteristics.
Results: According to our study Patients in group A showed similar mortality compared to group B (3.3% P > 1). Patients in group A as compared with group B were less likely to receive postoperative red cell transfusion (1.33 ± 0.48 versus 1.90 ± 0.71, P <0.001, respectively), both groups shared similar incidences of postoperative morbidities. Patients in group A as compared with group B experienced 7-minutes longer aortic cross-clamping time and 10-minutes longer cardiopulmonary bypass time, but showed shorter postoperative hospitalization time.
Conclusion: Combined aortic and mitral valve surgery through upper ministernotomy is safe and effective minimally invasive technique
Downloads
References
Gundry, S. R., Shattuck, O. H., Razzouk, A. J., Del Rio, M. J., Sardari, F. F., & Bailey, L. L. (1998). Facile minimally invasive cardiac surgery via ministernotomy. The Annals of thoracic surgery, 65(4), 1100-1104.
Murzi, M., Cerillo, A. G., Bevilacqua, S., Gilmanov, D., Farneti, P., & Glauber, M. (2012). Traversing the learning curve in minimally invasive heart valve surgery: a cumulative analysis of an individual surgeon's experience with a right minithoracotomy approach for aortic valve replacement. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 41(6), 1242-1246.
Lio, A., Miceli, A., Ferrarini, M., & Glauber, M. (2016). Minimally invasive approach for aortic and mitral valve surgery. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 50(6), 1204-1205.
Lamelas, J. (2015). Minimally invasive concomitant aortic and mitral valve surgery: the “Miami Method”. Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 4(1), 33.
Zhao, D., Wei, L., Zhu, S., Zhang, Z., Liu, H., Yang, Y., ... & Wang, C. (2019). Combined mitral and aortic valve procedure via right mini-thoracotomy versus full median sternotomy insights from a single-center study of propensity-matched data. International Heart Journal, 60(2), 336-344.
Seitz, M., Goldblatt, J., Paul, E., Marcus, T., Larobina, M., & Yap, C. H. (2019). Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via right anterior mini-thoracotomy: propensity matched initial experience. Heart, Lung and Circulation, 28(2), 320-326.
Faerber, G., Tkebuchava, S., Scherag, A., Bley, M., Kirov, H., Diab, M., & Doenst, T. (2022). Right mini-thoracotomy for aortic plus mitral with or without tricuspid valve surgery. The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, 70(03), 174-181.
Atik, F. A., Svensson, L. G., Blackstone, E. H., Gillinov, A. M., Rajeswaran, J., & Lytle, B. W. (2011). Less invasive versus conventional double-valve surgery: a propensity-matched comparison. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 141(6), 1461-1468.
Aklog, L., Adams, D. H., Couper, G. S., Gobezie, R., Sears, S., & Cohn, L. H. (1998). Techniques and results of direct-access minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a paradigm for the future. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 116(5), 705-715.
Gosain, P., Larrauri-Reyes, M., Mihos, C. G., Escolar, E., & Santana, O. (2016). Aortic and/or mitral valve surgery in patients with pulmonary hypertension performed via a minimally invasive approach. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, 22(5), 668-670.
Scarci, M., Young, C., & Fallouh, H. (2009). Is ministernotomy superior to conventional approach for aortic valve replacement?. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, 9(2), 314-317.
Kassem, E., Refat, A., Salem, A., & Eldib, O. S. (2022). Aortic valve replacement: J-shaped upper sternotomy versus conventional sternotomy. Zagazig University Medical Journal, 28(2), 315-319.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.