The Role of Parental Health Literacy in Clinical Outcomes Among Neonates Undergoing Surgery: A Systemic Review of Current Evidence
Keywords:
Health literacy, Neonatal surgery, Clinical outcomes, Postoperative care, Health disparitiesAbstract
Background: Parental health literacy (HL) is increasingly recognized as a critical determinant of clinical outcomes for neonates undergoing surgery. Effective parental HL supports accurate decision-making, adherence to postoperative protocols, and early recognition of complications, directly influencing recovery and long-term developmental outcomes. This review synthesizes current evidence on the impact of parental HL in neonatal surgical contexts, identifies effective HL interventions, and proposes strategies to overcome implementation challenges.
Methods: A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature published between 2010 and 2025 was conducted to examine parental health literacy (HL) within the context of neonatal surgical care. The search encompassed major academic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, utilizing a range of relevant keywords such as "parental health literacy," "neonatal surgery," "clinical outcomes," and "postoperative care." The included studies were critically evaluated to assess their contributions to understanding the impact of parental HL on neonatal surgical outcomes.
Results: The review identified a consistent, positive association between high parental HL and improved neonatal surgical outcomes. Parents with higher HL demonstrated better comprehension of preoperative risks, more accurate adherence to postoperative care protocols, and more effective communication with healthcare providers. These factors collectively contributed to reduced rates of surgical complications, lower readmission rates, and shorter hospital stays. Effective interventions included teach-back methods, pictogram-enhanced instructions, digital health tools, Family Integrated Care (FiCare) programs, and professional interpreter services, each demonstrating significant improvements in HL and clinical outcomes.
Conclusion: Enhancing parental HL is essential for improving neonatal surgical outcomes. A multilayered approach incorporating routine HL assessment and targeted interventions offers a practical pathway to safer recovery and more equitable health outcomes. Future research should prioritize the development of standardized HL assessment tools tailored to neonatal surgical settings, assess the long-term impact of HL interventions, and explore scalable, cost-effective strategies, particularly in resource-limited environments.
Downloads
References
Zakariah A, Srofenyoh EK, Sittie AA, Ameh EA. Burden of neonatal surgical conditions in northern Ghana. World J Surg. 2020;44(1):145-153.
Zani A, Peters MJ, Blackstock S, et al. Contemporary outcomes of oesophageal atresia and tracheo-oesophageal fistula repair. Ann Surg. 2021;273(6):1152-1160.
Deprest J, Gratacos E, Nicolaides KH, et al. Mortality and morbidity after prenatal versus postnatal repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(4):386-395.
Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Adams-Chapman I, et al. Neurodevelopmental and growth impairment among extremely low-birth-weight infants with neonatal infection. JAMA. 2004;292(19):2357-2365.
Sherwood N, Whitaker K. Physiology, neonatal. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
Shaw C, Norris T, Kumpunen S, et al. Parents' experiences of communication and involvement in decision-making in neonatal surgery. Sociol Health Illn. 2016;38(9):1217-1242.
Dahl K, Håkansson J, Nyström B, et al. Parental decision-making in neonatal intensive care: a qualitative study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001;84(2):F77-F80.
Snowdon C, Garcia J, Elbourne D. Making sense of randomised trials: qualitative study of parents and clinicians. Trials. 2014;15:402.
Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies. Health Promot Int. 2000;15(3):259-267.
Ishikawa H, Takeuchi T, Yano E. Measuring functional, communicative and critical health literacy among diabetic patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;71(1):31-39.
Sørensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, et al. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:80.
Enlow E, Kassam-Adams N, Sood E, et al. Health literacy among parents of newborn infants. J Perinatol. 2016;36(6):505-509.
Harris HH, Malloy M, Bailey SC. Addressing low health literacy in the NICU to reduce medication-dosing errors. Neonatal Intensive Care. 2023;36(2):50-57.
O'Brien K, Robson K, Bracht M, et al. Effectiveness of family integrated care in neonatal intensive care units on infant and parent outcomes: a multicentre, pragmatic, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Early Hum Dev. 2018;117:7-15.
Sentell T, Braun KL, Davis J, Davis T. Health literacy and meeting breast and cervical cancer screening guidelines among Asians and whites in California. Springerplus. 2015;4:432.
Marmot M, Allen J, Goldblatt P, et al. Social determinants of health inequalities. Lancet. 2008;365(9464):1099-1104.
Schillinger D, Piette J, Grumbach K, et al. Closing the loop: physician communication with diabetic patients who have low health literacy. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(1):83-90.
Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361-1367.
Pleasant A, McKinney J, Rikard RV. Health literacy measurement: a proposed research agenda. J Health Commun. 2011;16(Suppl 3):11-21.
Weiss BD, Mays MZ, Martz W, et al. Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: the Newest Vital Sign. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(6):514-522.
Sanders LM, Federico S, Klass P, et al. Development of a Parental Health Literacy Activities Test (PHLAT). Pediatrics. 2009;124(Suppl 3):S315-S326.
Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHealth literacy: essential skills for consumer health in a networked world. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(2):e9.
Weisleder A, Cates CB, Dreyer BP, et al. Psychosocial stress and parental health literacy. Acad Pediatr. 2016;16(4):305-312.
McCarthy M, Benigno M, Roach N, et al. Family literacy interventions in neonatal intensive care units: a scoping review. Early Hum Dev. 2022;166:105577.
Robinson JR, Kalaniti K, Peters MJ, et al. Parental understanding of surgical care in the neonatal intensive care unit: a cross-sectional study. J Pediatr Surg. 2020;55(8):1362-1368.
Nguyen VT, Pham TN, Ha VS, et al. Teach-back improves surgical informed-consent comprehension. Patient Saf Surg. 2022;16:42.
Shieh C, Khan BS, Chen S, et al. Parental health literacy at discharge predicts neurodevelopment at three years in very-low-birth-weight infants. J Pediatr. 2022;245:66-72.
Harvey M, Patel N, Saunders M, et al. Impact of a child-life video preparation on preoperative anxiety. Child Life J. 2023;1:1-9.
Zhang Y, Li X, Huang H, et al. WeChat-guided preparation reduces anxiety in parents of infants with congenital heart disease. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023;18:245.
Silva DL, Tavares WR, Andrade RF, et al. Medication errors in neonatal intensive care: a systematic review. J Pediatr Nurs. 2024;71:108-117.
Jacobs MR, Donkers HW, Veenstra L, et al. eHealth technologies to support communication with parents in neonatal care. Int J Med Inform. 2020;140:104168.
Albrecht L, Scott SD, Hartling L, et al. Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in neonatal care: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2021;104:2184-2194.
EBSCO Option Grid® patient decision aids. My Health Decisions [Internet]. 2024.
Liu L, Zhang H, Wang T, et al. Readmission after neonatal intensive care unit discharge: risk factors and outcomes. J Pediatr. 2024;259:110-118.
Geskey JM, Cyran SE, West DE, et al. Focusing on families and visitors reduces healthcare-associated respiratory viral infections in the NICU. Am J Infect Control. 2020;48(5):546-551.
Chan KY, Smith JD, Wong SP, et al. Parental health literacy and risk-adjusted mortality after neonatal gastrointestinal surgery. J Pediatr Surg. 2023;58(1):96-102.
Trinh TD, Li K, Rosenbaum S, et al. Mobile applications to support parents in the transition from neonatal intensive care. J Perinatol. 2023;43:123-131.
Yin HS, Parker RM, Sanders LM, et al. Pictograms, units and dosing tools, and parent medication errors. Pediatrics. 2017;140(1):e20163237.
O'Donnell M, Nassar N, Leonard H, et al. Peer support after NICU discharge: randomised trial. J Perinatol. 2022;42:1502-1510.
Yu H, Wang Y, He P, et al. Teach-back video education reduces postpartum anxiety. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22:213.
Ahmed Z, Qazi SA, Charlet A, et al. Hand hygiene for infection prevention in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;CD013326.
Mostafavi B, Steward D, Shelley J, et al. App-driven care for parents of children after surgery. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54:2460-2465.
van Venendaal NR, Franck LS, Obeid F, et al. FICare improves discharge readiness. J Clin Nurs. 2024;33:1123-1134.
Walton M, Mason E, Amin R, et al. Parents' preferences for discharge education: teach-back and demonstration. Hosp Pediatr. 2018;8:778-785.
Handal B, Govindaswami B, Navarro-Alvarez S, et al. Improving parent hand-hygiene compliance in the NICU. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023;44:987-995.
Davidson JE, Aslakson RA, Long AC, et al. Guidelines for family-centred care in the NICU. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:103-128.
Pitthan L, Rocha TS, Castro A, et al. Visual storytelling videos in the cardiac ICU: a feasibility study. Cardiol Young. 2023;33:1374-1382.
Michelson K, Fox M, Ng S, et al. Increasing in-person interpreter utilisation in the NICU: barriers and solutions. J Perinatol. 2024;44:580-588.
Muscat DM, Ayre J, Mac O, et al. Digital interventions to improve health literacy among parents: systematic review. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022;5:e31064.
[50] Kirolos A, Tumuhairwe J, Waiswa P, et al. Facilitators and constraints to Family Integrated Care in low-resource settings. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2024;109:F500-F507.
Harrison MS, Ohuma EO, Goldenberg RL, et al. Preemie Prep for Parents randomised clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2023;177:743-751.
Cheah IGS. Economic assessment of neonatal intensive care services. Trans Pediatr. 2019;8:154-165.
Cerovski J, Sims S, Dabrowski A. Health-literacy policy and teach-back sustainability in an inpatient setting. J Patient Saf. 2023;19:e707-e713.
Costeloe K, Bloomfield T, Manley J, et al. Digital health as a mechanism to reduce NICU utilisation. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2024;7:e56247.
Jovicic M, Okan O, Sørensen K. Sustainability of health-literacy interventions in hospital systems. Sustainability. 2024;16:3964.
Illinois Perinatal Quality Collaborative. Overcoming language barriers in the NICU: tip sheet. 2022.
Bentley ME, Johnson SL, Wasser H, et al. Socio-demographic factors related to parent presence and engagement in the NICU. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21:476.
Baughcum AE, Fortney CA, Winning AM, et al. Impact of parental primary language on communication in the NICU. J Perinatol. 2019;39:1306-1314.
Johnston J, Meyer MN, Blakeney S, et al. Telemedicine for support of parents of high-risk newborns. J Telemed Telecare. 2020;26:263-271.
Dharmar M, Romano PS, Nesbitt TS, et al. Telemedicine across the continuum of neonatal-perinatal care. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;27:101245.
Renu A, Patil N, Smith V, et al. Telemedicine improves rate of successful first NICU follow-up visit. Hosp Pediatr. 2023;13:3-10.
Chuo J, et al. Opportunities for telemedicine to improve parents’ well-being. Pediatrics. 2024;153:e2023067892.
Sisk B, et al. Overcoming barriers of language and literacy in neonatal intensive care using a web-based interface. Am J Perinatol. 2023;40:714-722.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
