Evaluating GDF-15 As A Marker of Atherosclerotic Severity Using TIMI Score Stratification in Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Authors

  • Shah Namrata
  • Singh Mamta
  • Agarwal Pradeep
  • Saini Shakuntala
  • Gautam Dinesh

Keywords:

Growth differentiation factor-15, Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome, TIMI risk score

Abstract

Background: GDF-15, a cytokine of the TGF-β superfamily, is expressed in atherosclerotic plaque macrophages. While several biomarkers have been widely studied in Acute coronary syndrome (ACS), data linking GDF-15 to angiographic severity in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), as measured by TIMI score, remain limited. This study investigates the association between GDF-15 levels, atherosclerotic burden, and clinical outcomes in NSTE-ACS patients to enhance risk stratification and guide management.

Methods: The study included 100 diagnosed cases of NSTE-ACS, including 34 patients with Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) and 66 with Unstable Angina (UA). Patients were stratified into three risk groups based on the TIMI risk score: low (0–2), intermediate (3–4), and high (≥5). Blood samples were collected at admission, and serum GDF-15 levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Results: Of the 100 NSTE-ACS patients, 46% were classified as low risk, 39% as intermediate risk, and 15% as high risk based on TIMI scores. High-risk status was more common among males and UA patients. A significant association was found between diagnosis and risk categories (P = 0.014). GDF-15 levels significantly increased across risk groups, with the highest levels in the high-risk group (P < 0.001). The ROC curve analysis showed excellent predictive value for GDF-15, with an AUC of 0.985 (p < 0.001). An optimal cut-off value of >954 pg/mL demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 92.94% specificity in identifying high cardiovascular risk.

Conclusion: GDF-15 levels strongly correlate with TIMI risk scores in NSTE-ACS, supporting its role as a promising biomarker for risk assessment and disease severity stratification.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Balaha MF, Alamer AA, Kabel AM, Aldosari SA, Fatani S. A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study of Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients’ Quality of Life and Drug Prescription Patterns at Riyadh Region Hospitals, Saudi Arabia. Healthcare. 2023 Jul 7;11(13):1973–3.

Bhatt DL, Lopes RD, Harrington RA. Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Review. JAMA [Internet]. 2022 Feb 15;327(7):662–75. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35166796/

Kumar A, Cannon CP. Acute Coronary Syndromes: Diagnosis and Management, Part I. Mayo Clinic Proceedings [Internet]. 2009 Oct 1;84(10):917–38. Available from:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0025619611605090

Rodriguez F, Mahaffey KW. Management of patients with NSTE-ACS: a comparison of the recent AHA/ACC and ESC guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2016 Jul 19;68(3):313-21.

Reed GW, Rossi JE, Cannon CP. Acute myocardial infarction. Lancet (London, England) [Internet]. 2017;389(10065):197–210. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27502078

Zhang et al. “Growth differentiation factor-15 predicts the prognoses of patients with acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis.” BMC Cardiovascular Disorders (2016) 16:82 DOI 10.1186/s12872-016-0250-2.

Daniel Lindholm, Stefan K. James, Maria Bertilsson, Richard C. Becker, Christopher P. Cannon, Evangelos Giannitsis, Robert A. Harrington, Anders Himmelmann, Frederic Kontony, Agneta Siegbahn, Philippe Gabriel Steg, Robert F. Storey, Matthijs A. Velders, W. Douglas Weaver, and Lars Wallentin. “Biomarkers and Coronary Lesions Predict Outcomes after Revascularization in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.” Clinical Chemsitry 63.2. 573-584 (2017).Epub 2016/12/10. http://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2016.261271 PMID:27932413.

Stale H Nymo, Marianne Hartford, Thor Ueland, Arne Yndestad et al. “Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) concentration is independently associated with mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome.” DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.028.

Milks MW, Nambi V. Cardiac Injury, Maladaptation, and Heart Failure Incidence. Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Disease: Elsevier; 2019. p. 81-96.

K.C. Wollert, T. Kempf, L. Wallentin, Grow-differentiation factor 15 as a biomarker in cardiovascular disease, Clin. Chem. (2017) 140–151.

J.E. Ho, A. Mahajan, M.H. Chen, M.G. Larson, E.L. McCabe, T.J. Wang, et al., Clinical and genetic correlates of GDF-15 in the community, Clin. Chem. 58 (2012) 1582–1591.

Xu J, Kimball TR, Lorenz JN, Brown DA, Bauskin AR, Klevitsky R, et al. GDF15/MIC-1 functions as a protective and antihypertrophic factor released from the myocardium in association with SMAD protein activation. Circulation research. 2006;98(3):342-50

KempfT, EdenM, StrelauJ,NaguibM,WillenbockelC, Tongers J, Heineke J,KotlarzD,Xu J,Molkentin JD,NiessenHW,DrexlerH Wollert KC. The transforming growth factor-superfamily member growth-differentiation factor-15 protects the heart from ischemia/ reperfusion injury. Circ Res. 2006;98:351–360.

Wollert KC, Kempf T, Peter T, Olofsson S, James S, Johnston N, et al. Prognostic Value of Growth-Differentiation Factor-15 in Patients With Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome. Circulation. 2007 Feb 27;115(8):962–71.

Unsicker K, Spittau B, Krieglstein K. The multiple facets of the TGF-beta family cytokine growth/differentiation factor-15/macro phage inhibitory cytokine-1. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2013;24:373–84. doi:10.1016/ j.cytogfr.2013.05.003.

S. Tzikas, V. Vassilikos, T. Keller, GDF-15 as a risk stratification biomarker for cardiovascular disease, Int. J. Cardiol. 292 (2019) 246–247.

T. Ago, J. Sadoshima, GDF15, a cardioprotective TGF-beta superfamily protein, Circulation Res 98 (2006) 294–297.

M.R. Bootkov, A.R. Bauskin, S.M. Valenzuela, A.G. Moore, M. Bansal, X.Y. He, et al., MIC-1, a novel macrophage inhibitory cytokine, is a divergent member of the TGF-ß superfamily, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94 (1997) 11514–11519.

K.C. Wollert, T. Kempf, L. Wallentin, Grow-differentiation factor 15 as a biomarker in cardiovascular disease, Clin. Chem. (2017) 140–151.

J.E. Ho, A. Mahajan, M.H. Chen, M.G. Larson, E.L. McCabe, T.J. Wang, et al., Clinical and genetic correlates of GDF-15 in the community, Clin. Chem. 58 (2012) 1582–1591.

P.J. Emmerson, F. Wang, Q. Liu, R.T. Pickard, Y. Du, D. Malgorzata, et al., The metabolic effects of GDF15 are mediated by the orphan receptor GFRAL, Nat. Med. 23 (2017) 1215–1219.

E. Hagstrom, S.K. James, M. Bertilsson, R.C. Becker, A. Himmelmann, L. Wallentin, et al., GDF-15 level predicts major bleeding and cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes: results from the PLATO study, Eur. Heart J. 37 (2016) 1325–1333.

K.M. Eggers, T. Kempf, T. Allhoff, B. Lindahl, L. Wallentin, K.C. Wollert, GDF-15 for early risk stratification in patients with acute chest pain, Eur. Heart J. 29 (2008) 2327–2335.

N. Schaub, T. Reichlin, R. Twerenbold, M. Reiter, S. Steuer, S. Bassetti, et al., GDF- 15 in the early diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with acute chest pain, Clin. Chem. 58 (2012) 441–449.

Y. Wang, C. Zhen, R. Wang, G. Wang, Growth-differentiation factor 15 predicts adverse cardiac events in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis, Am. J. Emerg. Med. 37 (2019) 1346–1352.

Zhang S, D D, X W, H Z, H J, R Z, et al. Growth differentiation factor-15 predicts the prognoses of patients with acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord [Internet]. 2016 May 6 [cited 2025 Jun 5];16. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27154403/

Downloads

Published

2025-07-08

How to Cite

1.
Namrata S, Mamta S, Pradeep A, Shakuntala S, Dinesh G. Evaluating GDF-15 As A Marker of Atherosclerotic Severity Using TIMI Score Stratification in Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Jul.8 [cited 2025Sep.24];14(7):1282-8. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/8087