Revitalizing Learning: Examining How Hybrid Environments Influence Student Engagement and Academic Success
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i32S.8099Keywords:
Quantitative Examination, Digital-Based, Revitalizing Learning, Constructivist learning, Educational Institutions, AcademicAbstract
Hybrid learning has transformed traditional paradigms of education with the infusion of in-person learning into digital-based platforms. In the context of adjusting educational institutions to shifting technological fronts, the effect of hybrid learning on student engagement and academic success assumes critical importance as different models of hybrid learning could alter student participation, motivation, and performance. Thus, digital tools, instruction design, and the interaction of these variables regarding their impact on learner outcomes are some of the important areas to be investigated. Hybrid learning environments offer the opportunity for learners to exercise synchronous and asynchronous learning, which allows a student to personalize education at one's pace. The combination of classroom and online interaction supports active learning in allowing learners to move at their own pace while still having access to real-time discussions and group activities. It has been shown that such environments support student engagement by using multiple learning styles and preferences. However, the hybrid learning approach hinges on the strategy and implementation of instruction as well as the supporting infrastructure and the technology support system.
This paper applies the mixed-method approach with a quantitative examination of student performance metrics and a qualitative understanding obtained from surveys and interviews. The study sample consisted of students from several disciplines who have taken the hybrid courses; hence, they are in a good position to offer the most detailed insight into their experiences. In some of the major variables considered include participation rates, knowledge retention, academic achievements, and perception of engagement in hybrid settings. The hybrid or blended mode will present difficulties in digital literacy gaps, difficulty of accessibility, and variation of self-regulated learning among the students when switching to this set-up. It has a list of disadvantages like the fact that it could affect student responsibility with regards to holding themselves accountable especially in asynchronous platforms, and keeping students engaged within the learning contents are problems teachers need to cope with. This paper draws on the nature of hybrid learning to analyze potential impacts on outcomes in education - much-needed light for educators, administrators, and policymakers seeking environments that work well for students. The findings draw attention to key considerations in planning hybrid courses for engaging instructional methods, robust support from technology, and a feeling of community amongst learners. As for the ending conclusion, the future of education may be greatly considered in discourse: adaptive learning models that fulfill future needs regarding those students educated using digital era processes.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87-122.
Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2012). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. John Wiley & Sons.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5-22.
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1-47.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87-122.
Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2012). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. John Wiley & Sons.
Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5-22.
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass.
Graham, C. R. (2019). Current research in blended learning and directions for future research. In Blended Learning: Research Perspectives, Volume 3 (pp. 425-454). Routledge.
Hew, K. F., Qiao, C., & Tang, Y. (2020). An interactive gamified learning platform: Effects on college students' engagement and learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 149, 103818.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2014). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1-47.
Miller, M. D. (2020). Minds online: Teaching effectively with technology. Harvard University Press.
Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Swan, K., & Alemanne, N. (2021). Social presence in blended courses: Understanding engagement and achievement. The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 45-57.
Selwyn, N. (2020). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.