Footprints of the Future: How Toe Prints Can Predict Your Malocclusion

Authors

  • Sunil Vishwambhar Kalyankar
  • Sandeep Jethe
  • Varsha Merani
  • Shailesh Dongre
  • Arun Mhaske
  • Suyog Shendage
  • Abulrehman Foujdar
  • Aakanksha Kedar

Keywords:

Toeprint, prediction, fingerprint, malocclusion

Abstract

Aim-This study investigates the relationship between plantar dermatoglyphic patterns (Toeprints) and the three classes of malocclusion, with a focus on gender-based variations.

Background- Dermatoglyphics of the Toes are formed during early intrauterine life and remain unchanged throughout life. Their genetic basis makes them valuable for early prediction of craniofacial development.The correlations between dermatoglyphic patterns and malocclusion, particularly in relation to gender differences, suggest a possible genetic basis for both phenomena. Several genes involved in craniofacial development, including those related to neural crest cells and the formation of the ectodermal layer, may influence both dermatoglyphic patterns and skeletal development. Further genetic studies are needed to explore the exact mechanisms through which these patterns emerge and their potential as biomarkers for craniofacial conditions.

Material and methods -This analysis determined that a minimum sample size of twenty individuals (male , female ) required for each state of skeletal malocclusion (Class I, II, and III). A total of 120 individuals were subsequently recruited to represent the three different skeletal malocclusion groups.This study analyzed 120 individuals divided evenly among malocclusion Classes I, II, and III, with 20 males and 20 females in each.

Result-In Class I malocclusion, males exhibited a higher proportion of whorls (45%), followed by arches (30%) and loops (25%). Conversely, Class I females showed a predominance of loops (55%), followed by arches (25%) and whorls (20%).Class II malocclusion, males had the highest frequency of whorls (60%), with equal distribution of arches and loops (20% each). Females in Class II also showed a considerable presence of whorls (45%), although loops (40%) were more prominent compared to arches (15%).In Class III malocclusion, a notable increase in arches was observed, particularly in males (60%) and females (50%), suggesting that arch patterns may be associated with more severe skeletal discrepancies such as mandibular prognathism.

Conclusion- As research in this field progresses, it may lead to the development of novel diagnostic tools and early intervention strategies based on dermatoglyphic analysis, enhancing the understanding of the genetic underpinnings of malocclusion and contributing to more effective orthodontic treatments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cummins H, Midlo C, Finger prints, palms and soles An introduction to Dermatoglyphics 1961 New YorkDover Publications, Inc [Google Scholar]

Mulvihill JJ, Smith DW, The genesis of dermatoglyphics Journal of Pediatrics 1969 75(4):579-89. [Google Scholar]

Pratibha R, Abhilash PR, Sherlin HJ, Anuja N, Premkumar P, Chandrasekar T, C onventional dermatoglyphics – revived concept: A review International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences 2011 2(3):446-58. [Google Scholar]

Uchida IA, Soltan HC, Evaluation of dermatoglyphics in medical genetics Pediatric Clinics of North America 1963 10:409-21. [Google Scholar]

Holt SB, Quantitative genetics of finger print patterns British Medical Bulletin 1961b 17:247 [Google Scholar]

Lichanska A. Fingerprint Analysis. Available from http://www.faqs.org/espionage/Ep-Fo/Fingerprint-Analysis.html [Google Scholar]

Maltoni D, Maio D, Jain AK, Prabhakar S, Handbook of fingerprint recognition 2003 Springer - Verlag [Google Scholar]

Galton F, Finger Prints 1892 LondonMacmillan [Google Scholar]

Lakshmi V, Dermatoglyphics and orthodontics – A review Annals and Essences of Dentistry 2013 5(4):30-33. [Google Scholar]

Soni A, Singh SK, Gupta A, Implications of dermatolyphics in dentistry Journal of Dentofacial Sciences 2013 2(2):27-30. [Google Scholar]

Verbov J, Clinical significance and genetics of epidermal ridges – A review of dermatoglyphics The Journal of Investigative Dermatology 1970 54(4):261-71. [Google Scholar]

Igbigbi PS, Msamati BC, Ng’ambi TM, Plantar and digital dermatoglyphic patterns in Malawian patients with diabetes mellitus, hypertension and diabetes mellitus with hypertension Int J Diabetes metabolism 2001 9:24-31. [Google Scholar]

Rosa A, Fañanas L, Bracha HS, Torrey EF, van Os J, Congenital dermatoglyphic malformations and psychosis: A twin study Am J Psychiatry 2000 157:1511-13. [Google Scholar]

Chintamani Khandelwal R, Mittal A, Qualitative and quantitative dermatoglyphic traits in patients with breast cancer: A prospective clinical study BMC Cancer 2007 7:44 [Google Scholar]

Quazi QH, Masokawa A, McGann B, Woods J, Dermatoglyphic abnormalities in the fetal alcohol syndrome Teratology 1980 21:157-60. [Google Scholar]

Balgir RS, Dermatoglyphic studies in epilepsy, juvenile delinquency and criminality and mental retardation: A review Acta Anthropogenet 1986 10:15-25. [Google Scholar]

Alter M, Schulenberg R, Dermatoglyphics in congenital heart disease Circulation 1970 41:49-54. [Google Scholar]

Schaumann B, Alter M, Dermatoglyphics in medical disorders 1976 New YorkSpringer – Verlag [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Published

2025-07-09

How to Cite

1.
Kalyankar SV, Jethe S, Merani V, Dongre S, Mhaske A, Shendage S, Foujdar A, Kedar A. Footprints of the Future: How Toe Prints Can Predict Your Malocclusion. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Jul.9 [cited 2025Sep.19];14(32S):4392-9. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/8135