Efficacy of Clinical Scoring in Diagnosing Malaria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i32S.8416Keywords:
Malaria, clinical scoring, reliable screening methodAbstract
Introduction: Malaria is one of the most widespread and deadly infectious diseases globally, primarily caused by Plasmodium parasites transmitted through the bites of infected female Anopheles mosquitoes. Objective: The main objective of the study is to find the efficacy of clinical scoring in diagnosing malaria in patients.
Methodology: This prospective observational study was conducted at Niazi Medical and Dental College, Sargodha during June 2023 to July 2024. The study involved 185 patients presenting with symptoms of fever and other malaria-associated clinical features at the healthcare facility.
Results: Data were collected from 185 patients, with a mean age of 32.4±3.71 years, ranging from 5 to 65 years. The majority of participants were adults aged 13–45 years (64.9%), while children (≤ 12 years) comprised 16.2%, and older adults (≥ 46 years) accounted for 18.9%. Of the total participants, 56.8% were male, and 43.2% were female. A significant portion had a travel history to malaria-endemic areas (45.9%), and 37.8% had a history of previous malaria. Common presenting symptoms included fever (100%), chills (75.7%), and headache (67.6%), while physical findings such as splenomegaly and hepatomegaly were observed in 21.6% and 13.5% of cases, respectively.
Conclusion: It is concluded that the clinical scoring system is a highly effective tool for diagnosing malaria, demonstrating excellent sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. It can serve as a reliable screening method, especially in resource-limited settings, where laboratory diagnostics may not always be readily available.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Prah JK, Amoah S, Yartey AN, Ampofo-Asiama A, Ameyaw EO. Assessment of malaria diagnostic methods and treatments at a Ghanaian health facility. Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Aug 19;39:251. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.251.28996. PMID: 34707752; PMCID: PMC8520419.
Aninagyei E, Deku JG, Yemofio KT, Quainoo E, Ntiri KA, Yaro E, Essandoh P, Agbogli HK, Asmah RH. Comparative evaluation of the diagnostic accuracies of four different malaria rapid diagnostic test kits available in Ghana. PLoS One. 2024 May 7;19(5):e0302840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302840. PMID: 38713676; PMCID: PMC11075830.
Berzosa P, et al. Comparison of three diagnostic methods (microscopy, RDT, and PCR) for the detection of malaria parasites in representative samples from Equatorial Guinea. Malar J. 2018;17(1):333. doi:10.1186/s12936-018-2481-4.
Ohrt C, Purnomo, Sutamihardja MA, Tang D, Kain KC. Impact of microscopy error on estimates of protective efficacy in malaria-prevention trials. J Infect Dis. 2002;186(4):540-6. doi:10.1086/341938.
Fitri LE, Widaningrum T, Endharti AT, Prabowo MH, Winaris N, Nugraha RYB. Malaria diagnostic update: From conventional to advanced method. J Clin Lab Anal. 2022;36(4):e24314. doi:10.1002/jcla.24314.
Thepsamarn P, et al. The ICT Malaria Pf: a simple, rapid dipstick test for the diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria at the Thai-Myanmar border. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1997;28(4):723-6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9656392.
Cunningham J, et al. A review of the WHO malaria rapid diagnostic test product testing programme (2008–2018): performance, procurement and policy. Malar J. 2019;18(1):387. doi:10.1186/s12936-019-3028-z.
WHO. Malaria rapid diagnostic tests. 2019. Available from: https://cdn-auth-cms.who.int/media/docs/default-source/malaria/diagnosis/archive-malaria-rdts-22dec2020.pdf.
Mouatcho JC, Goldring JPD. Malaria rapid diagnostic tests: challenges and prospects. J Med Microbiol. 2013;62(10):1491-1505. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.052506-0.
Kolekang AS, et al. Challenges with adherence to the ‘test, treat, and track’ malaria case management guideline among prescribers in Ghana. Malar J. 2022;21(1):332. doi:10.1186/s12936-022-04365-6.
Patra KP, Letendre SL, Vinetz JM, Bharti AR, Smith DM. Malaria diagnosis by a polymerase chain reaction–based assay using a pooling strategy. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;81(5):754-7. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2009.09-0274.
Abdel Hamid MM, et al. Pf7: an open dataset of Plasmodium falciparum genome variation in 20,000 worldwide samples. Wellcome Open Res. 2023;8:22. doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18681.1.
Aninagyei E, et al. Evaluating 18s-rRNA LAMP and selective whole genome amplification (sWGA) assay in detecting asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum infections in blood donors. Malar J. 2019;18(1):1-11. doi:10.1186/s12936-019-2850-7.
Aninagyei E. Repeated sampling improved the sensitivity of malaria microscopy in children under six years. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13(1):508. doi:10.1186/s13104-020-05359-w.
Pathania S, et al. Stability of proteins during processing and storage. In: Proteins: Sustainable Source, Processing and Applications. Elsevier; 2019. p. 295-330.
Rosa M, et al. Connecting high-temperature and low-temperature protein stability and aggregation. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0176748. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176748.
Talley K, Alexov E. On the pH‐optimum of activity and stability of proteins. Proteins Struct FunctBioinforma. 2010;78(12):2699-2706. doi:10.1002/prot.22786
Björkesten J, et al. Stability of proteins in dried blood spot biobanks. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2017;16(7):1286-1296. doi:10.1074/mcp.RA117.000015.
Hirai M, et al. Direct evidence for the effect of glycerol on protein hydration and thermal structural transition. Biophys J. 2018;115(2):313-327. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2018.06.005.
Atchade PS, et al. Is a Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA)-based assay a valid tool for detecting risky malaria blood donations in Africa? Malar J. 2013;12(1):279. doi:10.1186/1475-2875-12-279.
Martíáñez-Vendrell X, et al. Quantification of malaria antigens PfHRP2 and pLDH by quantitative suspension array technology in whole blood, dried blood spot and plasma. Malar J. 2020;19(1):12. doi:10.1186/s12936-019-3083-5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
