Postoperative Fistula After Different Palatoplasty Techniques

Authors

  • Asif Aziz
  • Hidayat Ullah

Keywords:

Cleft palate, Palatoplasty, Oronasal fistula, Furlow Z-plasty, Von Langenbeck technique, Postoperative complications, Cleft width

Abstract

Background:Postoperative oronasal fistula (ONF) is a common complication following cleft palate repair, adversely affecting speech, feeding, and overall quality of life. Various palatoplasty techniques differ in their fistula incidence and functional outcomes.

Objective: To compare the incidence of postoperative fistula among three widely used palatoplasty methods—Furlow’s double opposing Z-plasty, von Langenbeck’s palatoplasty, and two-flap palatoplasty—and to identify key risk factors influencing fistula formation.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 128 non-syndromic cleft palate patients aged 6 months to 3 years, who underwent primary palatoplasty from 2017 to 2024 at two tertiary hospitals in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Patient demographics, cleft characteristics, surgical technique, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Fistula incidence was assessed clinically at 1, 3 and 6-months post-surgery. Statistical analyses identified significant differences and predictors of fistula formation.

Results: Fistula rates differed significantly among techniques: Furlow (2.9%), two-flap (5.3%), and von Langenbeck (14.8%) (p=0.03). The hard-soft palate junction was the most frequent fistula site. Independent risk factors included cleft width >10 mm (OR 2.6), age >18 months at surgery (OR 2.3), and von Langenbeck technique (OR 3.8). Speech and feeding problems occurred more regularly in the von Langenbeck group.

Conclusion: Doing a double opposing Z-plasty helps reduce the risk of fistula after surgery stressing the importance of tension-free healing and muscle adjustment. Improvements in outcomes could be achieved by relying on sound surgical strategies with tension free closure and good and anatomical muscle approximation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bashir, M. M., Khan, M. M., Zaman, M., & Raza, M. A. (2022). Cleft Palate Fistula: A Review. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 38(1).

Ahmed, M., Iqbal, S., Khan, A., & Shah, S. A. (2023). Sommerlad-Furlow Modified Palatoplasty: A Retrospective Study. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 168, 111421.

Zafar, M. A., Sadiq, M., & Malik, M. (2023). Comparison of Outcomes of Surgical Repair of Cleft Palate: A Retrospective Study. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 34(5), 1481–1485.

Sharma, P. S., & Singh, R. (2023). Systematic Review of Postoperative Velopharyngeal Insufficiency. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 34(9), 2354–2360.

Dubois, M., & Fricain, J. C. (2024). Predictors of Fistula Formation After Primary Palatoplasty. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 82(1), 12–19.

Jan, M., Khan, N., & Ali, F. (2023). Frequency of Fistula in Patients Operated for Primary Cleft Palate. The Professional Medical Journal, 30(2), 150–155.

Ahmed, I., & Saeed, M. (2023). Evaluation of Palatoplasty Outcomes. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 39(3), 415–421.

Tariq, U., Khalid, M. E., & Hussain, A. (2022). Resident Involvement in Cleft Palate Surgery. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 33(6), 1234–1238.

Koizumi, Y., et al. (2023). Modified Furlow Palatoplasty Using Small Double-Opposing Z-Plasty. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 170, 111456.

Bruneel, L., et al. (2023). A Single Institution Comparison of Furlow and Straight Line Palatoplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open, 11(10), e5461.

Wang, Y., et al. (2024). Palatal Repair Techniques: Clinical Outcomes and Complications. Journal of Stomatology, 35(1), 55–60.

Peterson-Falzone, S., & Hardin-Jones, M. A. (2022). Impact of Palatal Fistula on Speech Outcomes. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 59(6), 785–791.

Müller, H., et al. (2023). Two-Flap vs. Furlow Palatoplasty Outcomes. Clinical Oral Investigations, 27, 2435–2442.

Shah, S. F., et al. (2023). Incidence of Fistula After Primary Cleft Palate Repair. ResearchGate.

Liu, Y., & Zhang, H. (2020). Width of the Cleft and Fistula Risk. West China Journal of Stomatology, 38(2), 123–128.

Basharat, M., & Rehman, A. (2025). Risk Factors for Velopharyngeal Insufficiency. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 36(5), 1050–1056.

Goudy, S., et al. (2015). Closure of Palatal Fistulae Using Flaps and Matrices. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 50(6), 1026–1030.

Park, Y. H., & Kim, N. G. (2023). Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Cleft Palate Repair. Archives of Craniofacial Surgery, 24(1), 24–30.

Al-Azzawi, M., & Al-Shurman, A. (2023). Combined technique provides new choice for cleft palate repair. Plastic Surgery News. https://www.plasticsurgery.org/news/press-releases/combined-technique-provides-new-choice-for-cleft-palate-repair

Kim, E., & Lee, J. (2024). Modified Furlow technique and its role in reducing postoperative complications. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 35(2), 198–205.

Watson, H. C., & Ali, S. (2023). Long-term outcomes of von Langenbeck palatoplasty: A 10-year follow-up. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 61(1), 22–30.

Thompson, L. M., & Cheng, Y. (2024). High recurrence rates of ONF in Langenbeck repairs: A retrospective analysis. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 168, 111352.

Browne, J. A., et al. (2023). Timing of primary surgery and the role of surgical learning in cleft palate repair: Findings from a randomized controlled trial. BMJ Open, 13(2), e067422.

Ward, C., & Rao, S. (2023). Investigating surgical learning in cleft repair trials. Annals of Surgery Open, 2(1), e0123.

Elshenawy, Y. A., & El Kholy, A. (2024). Outcome of the buccinator myomucosal flap in cleft palate repair. Archives of Craniofacial Surgery, 25(1), 12–18.

Hussain, M. S., & Rehman, M. (2023). Cleft width as a risk factor for ONF: Meta-analysis of surgical outcomes. Clinical Oral Investigations, 28(3), 1045–1053.

Lim, K. M., & Nadarajah, S. (2024). Anatomical predictors of fistula in primary cleft palate repair. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics, 36(2), 211–220.

Luo, Y., & He, Y. (2024). Structural vulnerability at the hard-soft palate junction in cleft repairs. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 77(1), 66–74.

Chan, M. L., & Feng, Z. (2023). Optimal suture techniques for palatal junctions: Preventing dehiscence. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 47(2), 312–318.

Diaz, M. G., & Robinson, E. (2023). Outcome-based cleft care: A focus on speech and function. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 60(6), 741–749.

Krishna, P., & Reddy, S. (2024). Predictors of functional recovery post cleft palate repair. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 59(2), 230–238.

Mostafa, A. M., & Nabil, M. (2024). Modified Furlow with buccinator flap reduces secondary complications. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 61(3), 321–329.

Rehan, A., & Bashir, A. (2024). Trauma-causing complications after cleft lip repair: A case series. Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery, 52(1), 98–104.

Omar, H., & Tariq, K. (2023). Systemic barriers in cleft palate repair: A global health perspective. Global Pediatric Health, 10, 2333794X231167399

Downloads

Published

2025-07-21

How to Cite

1.
Aziz A, Ullah H. Postoperative Fistula After Different Palatoplasty Techniques. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Jul.21 [cited 2025Oct.10];14(8):6089-93. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/8440