More Than Merit? Evaluating the Contribution of Non-Academic Determinants to the Influence on Teachers' Behaviour in Medical Education: A Cross-Sectional Survey of First-Year MBBS Students
Keywords:
medical education, teacher behavior, non-academic factors, favoritism, MBBS students, academic merit, professionalism, biasAbstract
Background: Although student-teacher relationships have always been known to be governed mostly by academic performance, there are indications that non-academic factors—such as looks, conduct, socio-economic status, and interpersonal relationship—are also shaping teachers' attitudes and responses towards students. These need to be identified so that equity and professionalism of medical education can be enhanced.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate first-year MBBS students' perceptions of how non-academic factors influence teachers’ behavior towards students.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was employed among first-year MBBS students using an anonymous Google Form-based, structured questionnaire. The instrument measured students' perceptions of certain academic and non-academic attributes that can influence teachers' behavior, i.e., physical looks, communication ability, assertiveness, socioeconomic position, and relationship. Descriptive statistics and inferential analyses were used to set patterns and association.
Results: Preliminary findings indicate that a significant majority of students believe that non-academic factors—specifically rapport and communication style at a personal level—have an impact on teacher behavior. Gender and appearance discrimination were also mentioned. Academic performance was still a significant predictor, but a vast majority of respondents felt that non-merit considerations stepped in at times to take over from it to decide teacher attention, feedback, or support. Out of 104 respondents, 62% were females. Of all the students, only 32% had done their schooling from a government institution. 39% reported having noticed favoritism based on appearance. 52% said students who are charismatic or sociable tend to attract more attention. While 46% of students acknowledge that a strong rapport with teachers enhances interaction and access to opportunities, 34% have felt demoralized due to differential treatment.
Conclusion: The study brings to perspective the nuances of interactions between merit and non-academic influences in constructing teacher-student relations in medical education. These results validate faculty development programs that enhance fairness, openness, and professionalism for creating a merit-based learning environment that is inclusive.
Downloads
References
Chen F. An empirical study of teacher-student interaction in college English classroom from the perspective of educational equality. Rev Cercet Interv Soc. 2020;(71):41–59.
Molinari L, Speltini G, Passini S. Do perceptions of being treated fairly increase students’ outcomes? Teacher–student interactions and classroom justice in Italian adolescents. Educ Res Eval. 2013;19(1):58–76. doi:10.1080/13803611.2012.748254.
Gil-Hernández CJ, Pañeda-Fernández I, Salazar L, Castaño Muñoz J. Teacher bias in assessments by student ascribed status: a factorial experiment on discrimination in education. Sociol Sci. 2024;11(27):743–76. doi:10.15195/v11.a27.
Sakçak A, Arslan Y, Polat S. Favouritism behaviours of school principals: teachers’ perceptions on the causes and consequences of favouritism in Turkey. Educ Stud. 2021;49(6):877–95. doi:10.1080/03055698.2021.1917340.
Lucey CR, Hauer KE, Boatright D, Fernandez A. Medical education’s wicked problem: achieving equity in assessment for medical learners. Acad Med. 2020;95(12 Suppl):S98–S108. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003717.
Bochatay N, Bajwa NM, Ju M, Appelbaum NP, van Schaik SM. Towards equitable learning environments for medical education: bias and the intersection of social identities. Med Educ. 2022;56(1):82–90.
Kulal A, N A M, Kanchan S. Impact of non-academic responsibilities of teachers on teaching quality. J Teach Educ Res [Internet]. 2022;17(02):5–12 [cited 2025 May 12]. Available from: https://www.jter.in/index.php/JTER/article/view/198.
Gallagher K. Student voice: perceptions of fair treatment in a Foundations program. J Appl Res High Educ. 2019;11(1):129–45. doi:10.1108/JARHE-03-2018-0037.
Dahlin M, Joneborg N, Runeson B. Stress and depression among medical students: a cross-sectional study. Med Educ. 2005;39(6):594–604.
Griffin AM, Langlois JH. Stereotype directionality and attractiveness stereotyping: is beauty good or is ugly bad? Soc Cogn. 2006 Apr;24(2):187–206. PMID:17016544; PMCID:PMC1447532.
Zebrowitz LA, Montepare JM. Faces and first impressions. In: Mikulincer M, Shaver PR, Borgida E, Bargh JA, editors. APA handbook of personality and social psychology. Vol. 1, Attitudes and social cognition. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 2015. p. 251–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/14341-008.
Hosoda M, Stone-Romero EF, Coats G. The effects of physical attractiveness on job-related outcomes: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. Pers Psychol. 2003 Jun;56(2):431–62.
Colquitt JA, Zapata-Phelan CP, Roberson QM. Justice in teams: a review of fairness effects in collective contexts. In: Martocchio JJ, editor. Research in personnel and human resources management. Vol. 24. Leeds: Emerald Group Publishing; 2005. p. 53–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(05)24002-1.
Lombas AS, Jiménez TI, Arguís-Rey R, Hernández-Paniello S. Impact of the Happy Classrooms Programme on psychological well-being, school aggression, and classroom climate. Mindfulness. 2019 Aug;10(8):1642–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01132-8.
Vijay D, Nair VG. In the name of merit: ethical violence and inequality at a business school. J Bus Ethics. 2022 Aug;179(2):315–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04824-1.
Kusurkar RA, Ten Cate TJ, Van Asperen M, Croiset G. Motivation as an independent and a dependent variable in medical education: a review of the literature. Med Teach. 2011;33(5):e242–62.
Wilkinson TJ, Gill DJ, Fitzjohn J, Palmer CL, Mulder RT. The impact on students of adverse experiences during medical school. Med Teach. 2006;28(2):129–35.
Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Shanafelt TD. Medical student distress: causes, consequences, and proposed solutions. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80(12):1613–22.
Jack K, Hamshire C, Harris WE, Langan M, Barrett N, Wibberley C. “My mentor didn't speak to me for the first four weeks”: Perceived unfairness experienced by nursing students in clinical practice settings. J Clin Nurs. 2018 Mar;27(5-6):929-38.
Stoudt BG. "This is exactly what this study is all about and it is happening right in front of me!" Using participatory action research to awaken a sense of injustice within a privileged institution. Urban Rev. 2012;44(4):476–96.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
