Critical Analysis of Audit Reports under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950: Ensuring Financial Transparency, Governance, and Legal Compliance in Public Charitable Trusts
Keywords:
Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950, Audit Report, Public Charitable Trusts, Financial Transparency, Legal Compliance, Trust Governance, Charity Commissioner, Mismanagement of Funds, Section 33, Asset Management, Trustee Accountability, Audit IrregularitiAbstract
The Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 (MPT Act) establishes the legal and regulatory framework for the administration of public charitable and religious trusts in Maharashtra. This paper critically examines the audit provisions under Sections 32 to 35 of the MPT Act, with a focus on financial transparency, statutory compliance, and governance accountability. It explores how the mandatory audit process, as prescribed by law, serves not only as a tool for financial scrutiny but also as a mechanism to detect mismanagement, safeguard trust property, and uphold public confidence in charitable institutions.
The paper investigates the legal obligations of trustees in maintaining accurate records, timely submission of audit reports, and compliance with prescribed formats, highlighting the consequences of non-compliance and delayed filings. Through an analytical lens, the paper also evaluates the role of the Charity Commissioner, the significance of auditor independence, and the impact of audit findings on the functioning and credibility of trusts. Furthermore, the paper identifies common challenges such as mismanagement of funds, lack of internal controls, and improper investment practices, and provides recommendations for strengthening accountability through legal reforms, trustee training, digital record-keeping, and regular audits. By addressing both procedural and systemic gaps, this paper underscores the vital role of audit compliance in ensuring that public trusts operate with integrity, transparency, and alignment with their charitable objectives under the MPT Act, 1950.
Downloads
References
Baxi, Accountability of Non-Profit Entities in India, 2020
Charity Commissioner Maharashtra, Annual Report on Public Trust Compliance, 2022
Desai & Kothari, Legal Frameworks for Trust Management, 2019
Gogate, Law Relating to Public Trusts in Maharashtra, 2018
Maharashtra State Gazette, Office of Charity Commissioner Rules and Procedures, 2021
The Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950
ICAI, Audit Guidelines for Charitable Trusts, 2021
FICCI, Handbook on Non-Profit Governance, 2019
Maharashtra Law Journal, Case Commentary on Trust Compliance, 2020
Charity Commissioner Office, Guidelines on Audit Formats, 2021
The Maharashtra Public Trusts Rules, 1951, r. 19
ICAI, Code of Ethics for Chartered Accountants, 2022
Charity Commissioner Mumbai, Audit Inspection Report, 2021
CAG Report on Public Institutions, 2022
Deshpande, Transparency in Nonprofit Governance, 2020
Indian Express, “Trust Mismanagement in Pune”, Jan 2022
State v. Jeevan Jyoti Trust, 2020 SCC OnLine Bom 1867
Charity Commissioner Mumbai, Annual Compliance Order, 2019
P.J. Foundation v. Charity Commissioner, 2018 SCC OnLine Bom 902
Deshmukh, Financial Accountability in Indian Nonprofits, 2022
FICCI & Deloitte, Governance in Indian Philanthropy, 2021
NITI Aayog, NGO Darpan Portal Review, 2020
Charity Commissioner Thane, Final Audit Inquiry Report, 2020
Maharashtra Charity Commissioner Office, Best Practice Awards, 2021
Economic Times, “Digital Audit Revolution in Philanthropy,” 2022
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.