Comparison of Irrigation Fluids In 3rd Molar Surgery: Fluids-Normal Saline, Normal Saline + Betadine, Normal Saline + Chlorhexidine
Keywords:
Chlorhexidinegluconate, Betadine, SalineAbstract
Aim: To compare the effectiveness of different irrigation fluids—Normal Saline, Normal Saline with Povidone-Iodine (Betadine), and Normal Saline with Chlorhexidine—in reducing postoperative complications such as pain, trismus, infection, and alveolar osteitis following impacted mandibular third molar surgery.
Materials and methods: A total of 60 participants were randomly divided into three groups (n=20 per group) based on the final irrigant used after tooth removal. Group A received 0.9% normal saline, Group B received a combination of normal saline and 0.5% povidone-iodine (Betadine), and Group C received normal saline with 0.12% chlorhexidinegluconate. All procedures were performed under local anesthesia using 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 adrenaline. A full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated, followed by bone guttering and tooth sectioning using saline as the standard coolant. Data analysis was done using SSPS software.
Results: In our study, a total of 60 patients were enrolled and equally divided into three groups: Group A (Normal Saline), Group B (Normal Saline + Betadine), and Group C (Normal Saline + Chlorhexidine), with 20 patients in each group. The mean age was comparable among the groups, recorded as 26.4 ± 4.2 years in Group A, 25.8 ± 3.9 years in Group B, and 26.1 ± 4.5 years in Group C. Gender distribution included 29 males and 31 females, with Group A comprising 11 males and 9 females, Group B with 10 males and 10 females, and Group C with 8 males and 12 females. Most participants (n = 47) were categorized as ASA I, while the remaining 13 were ASA II; Group A had 16 ASA I and 4 ASA II patients, Group B had the same distribution, and Group C included 15 ASA I and 5 ASA II. Mouth opening was measured in millimeters at three time points: preoperatively, postoperative day 1, and postoperative day 7. The preoperative values were similar across groups—16.6 ± 4.5 mm in Group A, 16.9 ± 1.7 mm in Group B, and 17.3 ± 1.8 mm in Group C (p = 0.472). On postoperative day 1, an increase in mouth opening was noted in all groups: 22.9 ± 5.7 mm in Group A, 25.1 ± 1.9 mm in Group B, and 26.2 ± 1.2 mm in Group C, showing a statistically significant difference (p = 0.004). By postoperative day 7, further improvement was seen—44.21 ± 3.5 mm in Group A, 45.1 ± 1.4 mm in Group B, and 45.9 ± 0.9 mm in Group C (p = 0.016). Intragroup comparisons also demonstrated statistically significant improvements over time (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Chlorhexidine irrigation showed slightly better improvement in postoperative mouth opening compared to betadine and normal saline.
Downloads
References
Blondeau F., Daniel N.G. Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: Operative complications and their risk factors. J. Can. Dent. Assoc. 2007;73:325.
Graziani F., D’Aiuto F., Arduino P., Tonelli M., Gabriele M. Perioperative dexamethasone reduces post-surgical sequelae of wisdom tooth removal. A split-mouth randomized double-masked clinical trial. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2006;35:241–246. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2005.07.010.
Contar C., Oliveira P., Kanegusuku K., Berticelli R., Azevedo-Alanis L., Machado M. Complications in third molar removal: A retrospective study of 588 patients. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal. 2009;15:e74–e78. doi: 10.4317/medoral.15.e74.
Torres M.A.F., Albiol J.G., Aytés L.B., Escoda C.G. Evaluation of the indication for surgical extraction of third molars according to the oral surgeon and the primary care dentist. Experience in the Master of Oral Surgery and Implantology at Barcelona University Dental School. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal. 2008;13:499–504.
Al-Asfour A. Postoperative Infection after Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: An Analysis of 110 Consecutive Procedures. Med. Princ. Pr. 2009;18:48–52. doi: 10.1159/000163046.
Satılmış T., Garip H., Arpacı E., Şener C., Göker K. Assessment of combined local anestesia and ketamine for pain, swelling and trismus after surgical extraction of third molars. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2009;67:1206–1210. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.12.034.
Povidone iodine: properties, mechanisms of action, and role in infection control and Staphylococcus aureus decolonization. Lepelletier D, Maillard JY, Pozzetto B, Simon A. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64:10–128. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00682-20.
Etiology and pathogenesis of fibrinolyticalveolitis (“dry socket”) Birn H. Int J of Oral Surg. 1973;2:211–263.
Povidone iodine in wound healing: a review of current concepts and practices. Bigliardi PL, Alsagoff SA, El-Kafrawi HY, Pyon JK, Wa CT, Villa MA. Int J Surg. 2017;44:260–268. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.06.073.
The effect of a chlorhexidine rinse on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Larsen PE. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991;49:932–937. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(91)90055-q.
Comparison of two irrigation solutions in the surgical removal of the mandibular third molars - a randomized trial. Reddy PA, Wahab PU, Jagadish V, Murugan PS. J Pharm Res Int. 2020;32:28–35.
The Efficiency of Three Irrigating Solutions after Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Cross-sectional Study. Jadhao VA, Rao A, Hande P, et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30287719/ J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19:1147–1151.
Sbricoli L, Cerrato A, Frigo AC, Zanette G, Bacci C. Third Molar Extraction: Irrigation and Cooling with Water or Sterile Physiological Solution: A Double-Blind Randomized Study. Dent J (Basel). 2021 Apr 1;9(4):40. doi: 10.3390/dj9040040. PMID: 33915980; PMCID: PMC8066638.
Vijayakumar G, Sundaram GkA, Kumar SP, Krishna VK, Krishnan M. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Four Different Irrigation Solutions on Postoperative Sequelae in Patients Undergoing Lower Third Molar Surgery: A Prospective Study. Cureus. 2023 Dec 20;15(12):e50816. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50816. PMID: 38249289; PMCID: PMC10797225.
Sruthy TV, Roshni A, Aslam S, Cherian MP, Soman S, Akhila K. Low-concentration Povidone-iodine and Normal Saline as Irrigant on Reducing Postoperative Complications after the Third-molar Surgery: A Comparative Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022 Jul 1;23(7):733-738. PMID: 36440521.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
