Determinants of Polyandry: An Analysis of Polyandrous Families in Shillai Tehsil, Himachal Pradesh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.3896Keywords:
Polyandry, Factor Analysis, Marriage Systems, Cultural Determinants, Economic Stability, Gender Roles, Family DynamicsAbstract
Polyandry, a rare but historically significant marital system, has been practiced in various regions of the world, including parts of India. This study examines the determinants influencing the persistence and transformation of polyandry among families in Shillai Tehsil, Himachal Pradesh. While much of the existing research has focused on the historical and cultural dimensions of polyandry, limited empirical studies have explored its contemporary relevance. This study employs a quantitative approach, utilizing factor analysis to identify the key social, economic, and cultural factors affecting polyandrous practices in the region.
The research was conducted in Shillai Tehsil, a region known for its historical prevalence of polyandry, where a sample of 36 respondents from polyandrous families was selected. Primary data was collected through in-depth interviews and structured surveys, capturing perspectives on marital roles, familial structures, economic conditions, and evolving societal attitudes. Thematic analysis and coding techniques were employed to categorize responses, followed by factor analysis to uncover dominant determinants. The findings indicate that economic stability, land inheritance practices, familial obligations, and cultural traditions play a crucial role in sustaining polyandry, while modernization, legal awareness, and shifting gender norms contribute to its decline.
Additionally, the study reveals that polyandrous families experience unique interpersonal and social challenges, such as power dynamics, emotional adjustments, and societal stigma. However, many respondents emphasized the practical advantages of polyandry, including shared financial responsibilities and resource management. The results also highlight the interplay between economic necessity and cultural continuity, suggesting that polyandry is not merely a relic of the past but an evolving institution influenced by broader social transformations.
By filling a critical research gap, this study provides a contemporary perspective on polyandry in Himachal Pradesh, offering valuable insights for scholars, policymakers, and social anthropologists. Understanding the determinants of polyandry in this region contributes to broader discussions on marriage systems, gender roles, and family dynamics in India. Future research should further explore the legal and psychological dimensions of polyandrous relationships, particularly in relation to changing societal norms.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Fortunato, L. (2018). The evolution of marriage systems in human societies.Cambridge University Press.
Mazumdar, H. T. (1966). The sociology of marriage and family. Dryden Press.
Kanazawa, S., & Still, M. C. (1999). Why monogamy? Social Forces, 78(1), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxx
Low, B. S. (1988). Marriage systems and reproductive strategies: Polygyny and resource competition. Human Nature, 6(3), 219–252. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxx
Levine, N. E., &Sangree, W. H. (1980). Polyandry: Cross-cultural perspectives and evolutionary theories. Anthropological Quarterly, 53(3), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxx
Chauhan, B., &Chauhan, R. (2015).Vivaha: Cultural and religious perspectives on Hindu marriage. New Age Publications.
Doniger, W. (1991).The laws of Manu.Penguin Classics.
Kapadia, K. M. (1966). Marriage and family in India.Oxford University Press.
Starkweather, K. E., &Hames, R. (2012).A survey of non-classical polyandry. Human Nature, 23(2), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxx
Singh, K. S. (1988). Tribal societies and polyandry in India. Concept Publishing Company.
Sharma, S. (2023).Draupadi and polyandry: A sociological exploration. Journal of Indian Epics and Society, 12(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxx
Beall, C. M., & Goldstein, M. C. (1981).Tibetan polyandry and cultural adaptations to scarce resources. Ethnology, 20(1), 1–13.
Childs, G. (2003). Polyandry and population growth in a Tibetan pastoral community. Human Nature, 14(2), 129–161.
Plutarch. (n.d.).Lives.(Original work, various editions and translations).
Shantideva. (8th Century). Bodhicharyavatara.(Various translations available).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.