Role Of Ultrasound Imaging in Assessment of Growth Plate and Its Clinical Applications – A One Year Hospital Based Observational Study
Keywords:
Long bones, Physeal plate width, UltrasonographyAbstract
Introduction: The cartilaginous primary physis or growth plate is a critical component of the immature skeleton and is present at the end of long bones in children allowing for longitudinal bone growth. Plain radiography is currently the standard imaging choice for fractures in children but isolated physeal fractures are easily missed on radiographs making Ultrasound a potential modality in detecting such fractures. Objectives:1)To determine baseline measurements of physeal plate width and to assess variation in the measured widths among contralateral sides, age group and sex in the pediatric population. 2)Ultrasound assessment of physeal plate in normal uninjured children in order to detect any variations from the normal anatomy if present including physeal plate fracture, bridge and premature closure of the physis. Methodology: This is a hospital based observational study, conducted for a period of 1 year in children between 5 to 12 years referred for ultrasound imaging to the department of Radio-diagnosis, KLE’S Dr Prabhakar Kore Hospital. A total of 96 patients were included in this study. Children were subjected to B-Mode ultrasonography of distal end of long bones- radius, ulna, tibia and fibula using a 7.5–12 MHz high frequency linear array transducer on GE VOLUSON machine (GE Healthcare, USA) and Philips HD-11Xe machine. Results: No significant statistical difference could be elicitated in physeal plate width measurement in children of different gender and similar age group. The average physeal plate width found in distal end of fibula is 3.0 ± 0.22 mm with a mean difference of 0.11 ± 0.3 mm between contralateral sides. For tibia is 3.5 ± 0.28 mm with a mean difference of 0.1 0.31mm between contralateral sides. For radius is 2.88 ± 0.25 mm with a mean difference of 0.08 ± 0.31mm between contralateral sides. for ulna is
2.74 ± 0.24 mm with a mean difference of 0.1 ± 0.32 mm between contralateral sides. No statistical difference was found in the physeal plate width between the contralateral sides for the long bones which were imaged in the study - radius, ulna, fibula or tibia. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that there is no statistically significant difference in physeal plate widths between contralateral extremities and between the two genders and age. The sonographic detection of significant disparities in physeal plate widths of injured children may have the potential for earlier detection of SH injuries with subsequent appropriate management.
Downloads
References
Ng L, Saul T, Lewiss RE. Sonographic Baseline Physeal Plate Width Measurements in Healthy, Uninjured Children [Internet]. 2014. Available from: www.pec-online.com
Clarke B. Normal bone anatomy and physiology. Vol. 3 Suppl 3, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN. 2008.
Gleeson AP, Stuart MJ, Wilson B. Paediatric Ultrasound assessment and conservative management of inversion injuries of the ankle in children PLASTER OF PARIS VERSUS TUBIGRIP. Vol. 78. 1996.
Nguyen JC, Markhardt BK, Merrow AC, Dwek JR. Imaging of Pediatric Growth Plate Disturbances. RadioGraphics. 2017 Oct;37(6):1791–812.
Dodwell ER, Kelley SP. Physeal fractures: Basic science, assessment and acute management. Orthop Trauma. 2011;25(5).
Meyers AB. Physeal bridges: causes, diagnosis, characterization and post-treatment imaging. Pediatr Radiol. 2019;49(12).
Levine RH, Thomas A, Nezwek TA, Waseem M. Salter Harris Fractures. 2022.
Makela EA, Vainionpaa S, Vihtonen K, Mero M, Rokkanen P. The effect of trauma to the lower femoral epiphyseal plate. An expermimental study in rabbits. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B. 1988;70(2).
Podeszwa DA, Mubarak SJ. Physeal fractures of the distal tibia and fibula (Salter-Harris Type I, II, III, and IV Fractures). Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2012;32(SUPPL. 1).
Caine D, DiFiori J, Maffulli N. Physeal injuries in children’s and youth sports: Reasons for concern? Vol. 40, British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2006. p. 749–60.
Jawetz ST, Shah PH, Potter HG. Imaging of Physeal Injury. Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach. 2015 Mar 17;7(2):142–53.
Wang CC, Linden KL, Otero HJ. Sonographic Evaluation of Fractures in Children. Vol. 33, Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography. SAGE Publications Inc.; 2017. p. 200–7.
Simanovsky N, Hiller N, Leibner E, Simanovsky N. Sonographic detection of radiographically occult fractures in paediatric ankle injuries. Pediatr Radiol. 2005;35(11).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.