Comparison Of The Adductor Pollicis And Corrugator Supercilii As Indicators for Adequacy Of Neuro-Muscular Blockade Recovery With Train Of Four(Tof) For Tracheal Extubation

Authors

  • Nagalla Shanmuka Gopinath
  • Kiran Velukuri
  • Chaitanya jakkam
  • Busetty Prithvi Raj
  • Kakani Vishnu Vandana
  • K. krishna chaithanya

Keywords:

N\A

Abstract

Background: Accurate assessment of neuromuscular blockade recovery is critical for safe tracheal extubation. Train-of-four (TOF) monitoring at different muscle sites, particularly the adductor pollicis (AP) and corrugator supercilii (CS), may vary in their ability to predict adequate recovery.

Aim: To compare the efficacy of AP and CS muscle monitoring using TOF in assessing adequate neuromuscular recovery for tracheal extubation.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on 60 patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgeries under general anaesthesia at Narayana Medical College. Patients were allocated into two groups: Group AP (n=30) received TOF monitoring at the adductor pollicis, and Group CS (n=30) at the corrugator supercilii. Anaesthetic management was standardized. Parameters including TOF ratio, BIS, hemodynamics, extubation criteria, and Ramsay sedation scores were recorded when TOF ≥ 0.9.

Results: There were no significant differences in demographic variables. However, at TOF 0.9, the CS group showed significantly lower BIS, heart rate, and blood pressure values (p < 0.0001), indicating deeper anaesthetic depth and better hemodynamic stability. Extubation criteria were met in 90% of the CS group and 92% of the AP group. Ramsay sedation scores were higher in the CS group, suggesting better sedation at similar TOF values.

Conclusion: Corrugator supercilii monitoring provides a reliable and earlier indication of adequate neuromuscular recovery and is associated with better hemodynamic and sedation profiles than the adductor pollicis. It is a superior site for TOF monitoring during emergence and extubation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hemmerling TM, Donati F. Neuromuscular blockade at the larynx, the diaphragm and the corrugator supercilii muscle: a review. Can J Anaesth 2003; 50: 779–94.

Hemmerling TM, Schmidt J, Hanusa C, Wolf T, Schmitt H. Simultaneous determination of neuromuscular block at the larynx, diaphragm, adductor pollicis, orbicularis oculi and corrugator supercilii muscles. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 856–60.

Suzuki T, Mizutani H, Miyake E, Fukano N, Saeki S, Ogawa S. Infusion requirements and reversibility of rocuronium at the corrugator supercilii and adductor pollicis muscles. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53: 1336–40.

Yamamoto S, Yamamoto Y, Kitajima O, Maeda T, Suzuki T. Reversal of neuromuscular block with sugammadex: a comparison of the corrugator supercilii and adductor pollicis muscles in a randomized dose–response study. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2015

Plaud B, Debaene B, Donati F. The Corrugator supercilii, not the orbicularis oculi, reflects rocuronium neuromuscular blockade at the laryngeal adductor muscles. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 96–101.

Donati F, Meistelman C, Plaud B. Vecuronium neuro muscular blockade at the diaphragm, the orbicularis oculi, and adductor pollicis muscles. Anesthesiology 1990; 73: 870–5.

BERTRAND DEBAENE, MD*, CLAUDE MEISTELMAN, MD visual estimation of train-of-four responses at the corrugator supercili and posttetanic count at the adductor pollicis during intense neurornuscular block anesth analg ;78:697-700

H. J. LEE, K. S. KIM*, J. S. JEONG, M. A comparison of the adductor pollicis, orbicularis oculi, and corrugator supercilii as indicators of adequacy of muscle relaxation for tracheal intubation 102 (6): 869–74 (2009)

Downloads

Published

2025-06-25

How to Cite

1.
Gopinath NS, Velukuri K, jakkam C, Raj BP, Vandana KV, chaithanya K krishna. Comparison Of The Adductor Pollicis And Corrugator Supercilii As Indicators for Adequacy Of Neuro-Muscular Blockade Recovery With Train Of Four(Tof) For Tracheal Extubation. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Jun.25 [cited 2025Sep.20];14(32S):2002-7. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/7687

Most read articles by the same author(s)