Factors Influencing Compliance With The Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Among Staff In The National Clinical Pathology and Microbiology Laboratory of Timor-Leste

Authors

  • Joana Melanya Das Dores Edy Barreto Fátima
  • Anderias Umbu Roga
  • Jacob M. Ratu
  • Jefri S. Bale
  • Paul G. Tamelan

Keywords:

Compliance, Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), Laboratory Staff, Timor-Leste

Abstract

The use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in microbiology and clinical pathology laboratories is essential to safeguard laboratory staff from occupational hazards such as infectious agents, chemicals, and toxic substances. Despite its importance, non-compliance remains a persistent issue, particularly in the National Clinical Pathology and Microbiology Laboratory of Timor-Leste. This study aims to analyze the factors influencing compliance with PPE usage among laboratory staff in Timor-Leste. This research employs a cross-sectional design with a mixed-methods approach, integrating the collection, analysis, and "mixing" of quantitative and qualitative data at various stages within a single study. The study population consists of a quantitative group, which includes all workers in the Clinical Pathology and Microbiology Laboratory, and a qualitative group comprising the Laboratory Director, Department Heads, lab technicians, administrative staff, and cleaning personnel. The quantitative sample size consists of 30 respondents, selected through purposive sampling. Data collection methods include questionnaires and in-depth interviews with qualitative participants. Pearson correlation analysis revealed no significant relationship between knowledge (p-value = 0.118, PR = 1.45; 95% CI = 0.85–2.50; r = 0.292), training (p-value = 0.796, PR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.50–1.80; r = 0.049), and PPE availability (p-value = 0.406, PR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.40–1.60; r = -0.157) with compliance to PPE usage. These findings highlight the need for enhanced supervision and enforcement of regulations, the provision of adequate and high-quality PPE, and continuous occupational health and safety training

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Anderson, C. (2016). The importance of personal protective equipment in healthcare settings. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 11(1), 28.

Australian Government Department of Health. (2020). Infection control guidelines for the prevention of transmission of infectious diseases in the healthcare setting.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Barone, M. A., Peters, A., Traub-Dargatz, J., & Morley, P. S. (2015). Biosafety in the use of personal protective equipment in veterinary practice. Veterinary Clinics: Equine Practice, 31(3), 449-463.

Brown, L., & Holmes, R. (2018). The role of continuous training in occupational safety compliance. Safety Science, 105, 123-129.

Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS). (2019). Personal protective equipment: A guide for workers.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2015). Guide to infection prevention for outpatient settings: Minimum expectations for safe care.

Cordeiro, L., Gnatta, J. R., Ciofi-Silva, C. L., Price, A., de Oliveira, N. A., Almeida, R. M. A., Mainardi, G. M., Srinivas, S., Chan, W., Levin, A. S. S., & Padoveze, M. C. (2022). Personal protective equipment implementation in healthcare: A scoping review. American Journal of Infection Control, 50(8), 898-905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2022.01.013

Chayanit Mahasing, Wanitchaya Kittikraisak, Joshua A Mott, Pornsak Yoocharoen, Phunlerd Piyaraj, Chuleekorn Tanathitikorn, Somsak Punjasamanvong, Thanapat Wongrapee, Patama Suttha, Thanit Rattanathumsakul, William W Davis, Matthew Westercamp, Suthat Chottanapund. (2023). Changes in personal protective equipment usage among healthcare personnel from the beginning of pandemic to intra-COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand. Annals of Work Exposures and Health, 67(5), 637-649. https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxad015

Cross, S. S., & Rutter, P. (2018). Health and safety in laboratories: Principles and practice. Wiley-Blackwell.

Diana Putri, I., & Yuniati, Y. (2022). Factors influencing nurse compliance with personal protective equipment. Jurnal Perilaku Kesehatan Terpadu, 1(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.61963/jpkt.v1i1.18

George, J., Shafqat, N., Verma, R., & Patidar, A. B. (2023). Factors influencing compliance with personal protective equipment (PPE) use among healthcare workers. Cureus, 15(2), e35269. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35269

Government of Timor-Leste. (2020). Timor-Leste National Action Plan for Health Security (NAPHS).

Government of Timor-Leste. (2021). National Health Sector Strategic Plan 2021-2030.

Handayani, T. (2010). Pengetahuan dan perilaku penggunaan alat pelindung diri pada petugas laboratorium di Indonesia. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 5(3), 150-157.

Health and Safety Executive (HSE). (2003). Safe use of personal protective equipment.

International Labour Organization (ILO). (2019). Safety and health at the heart of the future of work: Building on 100 years of experience.

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). (2020). COVID-19 - Control and prevention.

Rosenstock, I. M. (1974). The health belief model and preventive health behavior. Health Education Monographs, 2(4), 354-386.

Ndejjo, R., Musinguzi, G., Yu, X., Buregyeya, E., Musoke, D., Wang, J. S., & Whalen, C. C. (2015). Occupational health hazards among healthcare workers in Kampala, Uganda. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2015.

Sharma, M., Sharma, D., Sharma, A. K., Mohanty, A., Khapre, M., & Kalyani, C. V. (2022). Barriers faced by health-care workers in use of personal protective equipment during COVID pandemic at tertiary care hospital Uttarakhand, India: A qualitative study. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 11, 74. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_406_21

Smit, M. A., & de Gier, B. (2020). Factors influencing compliance with personal protective equipment among Dutch healthcare workers. BMC Infectious Diseases, 20, 475.

Smith, J. D., MacDougall, C. C., & Johnstone, J. (2016). Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting healthcare workers from acute respiratory infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ, 188(8), 567-574.

Smith, J., Doe, A., & Johnson, M. (2017). The impact of knowledge on safety compliance in laboratory settings. Journal of Occupational Health, 59(3), 234-242.

Timor-Leste Ministry of Health. (2018). National health accounts report 2018.

Timor-Leste Ministry of Health. (2019). Timor-Leste health information system strategic plan.

Verbeek, J. H., Ijaz, S., Mischke, C., Ruotsalainen, J. H., Mäkelä, E., Neuvonen, K., & Kilinc Balci, F. S. (2020). Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2020(4).

Wang, Y., Smith, R., & Lee, H. (2020). Beyond availability: Factors influencing PPE compliance in the workplace. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1892.

World Health Organization (WHO). (2019). WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care: First global patient safety challenge.

World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). COVID-19 strategy update: April 2020.

World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). Rational use of personal protective equipment for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and considerations during severe shortages

Downloads

Published

2025-07-21

How to Cite

1.
Edy Barreto Fátima JMDD, Roga AU, M. Ratu J, Bale JS, Tamelan PG. Factors Influencing Compliance With The Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Among Staff In The National Clinical Pathology and Microbiology Laboratory of Timor-Leste. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Jul.21 [cited 2025Sep.19];14(32S):6094-103. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/8449