To Study the Bacteriological Profile and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Pathogens Isolated from Urine Samples in Icu Patients at a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India

Authors

  • Anshika Srivastava
  • Geetanshu Chauhan
  • Nashra Afaq

Keywords:

BACTERIOLOGICAL, PROFILE, ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY PATTERNS, ICU, Blood, CLSI

Abstract

Background: Intensive care units (ICUs) are hotspots for multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections, which significantly contribute to patient morbidity and mortality. Prompt identification of pathogens and knowledge of their resistance profiles is essential for empirical therapy and infection control. Aim and Objective: To evaluate the distribution of pathogens from various clinical specimens in ICU patients and to analyze their antibiotic susceptibility patterns. Material and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology, Sharda Hospital, Greater Noida, over a defined period. A total of 2,125 clinical samples from ICU patients were processed according to standard microbiological protocols. Identification of isolates was done by biochemical testing, and antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method as per CLSI guidelines (2023) [1]. Results: In the present study out of the 2,125 samples, blood constituted 46%, urine 30%, respiratory 20%, and pus 4%. A total of 285 pathogens were isolated, with respiratory samples showing the highest positivity (46%). The most common organisms were E. coli (24%), Acinetobacter spp. (23%), Klebsiella spp. (13%), and Staphylococcus aureus (10%). Among Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenems (43%), tigecycline (43%), and aminoglycosides (41–42%) were the most effective drugs. Acinetobacter spp. showed high sensitivity to minocycline (68%) and tigecycline (45%) but complete resistance to nitrofurantoin and norfloxacin. Pseudomonas aeruginosa responded well to amikacin (79%) and carbapenems (75%). Gram-positive isolates like S. aureus and Enterococcus spp. were highly susceptible to linezolid (95–100%) and vancomycin (50–78%). Conclusion: The findings highlight a high burden of multidrug-resistant pathogens in ICU settings, with varying resistance patterns requiring continuous surveillance and rational antimicrobial stewardship

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Vincent JL, Rello J, Marshall J, et al. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009;34(5):365–378.

Kumar A, Ellis P, Arabi Y, et al. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(5):1536–1543.

Ventola CL. Pharm Ther. 2015;40(4):277–283.

Gandra S, Mojica N, Klein EY, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69(Suppl 5):S340–S345.

Banerjee T, Anupurba S. J Infect Public Health. 2021;14(5):669–675.

Behera B, Mathur P, Das A, et al. J Glob Infect Dis. 2020;12(4):172–179.

Mehta A, Rosenthal VD, Mehta Y, et al. Am J Infect Control. 2007;35(3):144–149.

Nordmann P, Naas T, Poirel L. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11(4):228–236.

Dey S, Sinha A, Mistry M, et al. J Clin Diagn Res. 2022;16(3):DC01–DC05.

World Health Organization. Global priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria to guide research, discovery, and development of new antibiotics. 2017.

Mahajan G, Mishra SK, Kumar M, et al. Trop Doct. 2023;53(1):56–60.

Kaur R, Gautam V, Ray P. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2015;33(2):255–257.

Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, M100-s24: Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility testing: Twenty-First Informational Supplement, Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, Pa, USA, 2023 Sharma S, Singh P. J Clin Diagn Res. 2020;14(5):DC01–DC05.

Patel P, Shah R. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021;25(4):415–421.

Vijayakumar S, Kanthan K. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2022;16(1):56–62.

Kollef MH. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(6):1411–1420.

Kumar,S.,Adithan,C.,Harish,B.N.,Sujatha,S.,&Roy,G.(n.d.).A.Malini Antimicrobial resistance in India: A review.

Gupta E, Mohapatra S. J Lab Physicians. 2021;13(2):135–140.

Joseph NM, Sistla S. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2020;38(1):112–116.

Ray P, Garg R. Indian J Med Res. 2021;153(6):702–709.

Sarma JB, Ahmed GU. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022;26(2):109–113.

Arunagiri K, Baskar V. Int J Med Microbiol Trop Dis. 2022;8(1):45–49.

Singh A, Mandal J. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2022;16(10):1656–1662.

Thomas R, Nair S. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2023;32:215–222.

Mehta Y, Gupta A. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019;23(11):541–546.

Taneja N, Kaur H. Indian J Med Res. 2018;147(6):562–570.

Dey R, Sengupta P. J Clin Diagn Res. 2023;17(2):DC10–DC14.

Ahmed Z, Purohit A. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2021;15(11):1624–1630.

Lebreton F, Willems RJL. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017;30(1):174–201.

Prakash R, Arora V. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2020;38(4):502–507.

Banerjee R, Johnson JR. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(10):1449–1457.

Gandra S, Joshi J. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(3):271–273.

Laxminarayan R, Matsoso P. Lancet. 2016;387(10014):168–175

Downloads

Published

2025-07-29

How to Cite

1.
Srivastava A, Chauhan G, Afaq N. To Study the Bacteriological Profile and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Pathogens Isolated from Urine Samples in Icu Patients at a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Jul.29 [cited 2025Oct.10];14(32S):6556-69. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/8620

Most read articles by the same author(s)