Comparative Effectiveness of Hypoxic Training Versus Traditional Sea-Level Training on VO₂ Max in Male Athletes Aged 20–30: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Authors

  • Harshal Giri
  • Farukh Mohammad Pinjara
  • Jafar Khan
  • Sunil Kumar
  • Veenodini Varade
  • Nilesh Patira
  • Sourabh Gupta
  • Renuka Pal
  • Chitrakshi A Choubisa
  • Adil Raza Ansari

Keywords:

N\A

Abstract

This randomized controlled trial compared the effects of 12 weeks of structured hypoxic training using normobaric masks (FiO₂ ~15%) versus traditional sea-level training on VO₂ max and related physiological adaptations in trained male athletes aged 20–30 years. Sixty athletes were randomly assigned to either a hypoxic training group (n = 30) or a normoxic control group (n = 30), with both undergoing identical endurance training protocols involving base runs, interval sessions, tempo runs, and long-duration efforts, five days per week. Pre- and post-training assessments included VO₂ max testing via graded treadmill protocols, hemoglobin concentration, lactate threshold evaluation, and resting heart rate. Subjective responses such as exertion, fatigue, and recovery were also recorded. After 12 weeks, the hypoxic group showed a significantly greater increase in VO₂ max (+5.2 ± 1.8 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹) compared to the control group (+3.4 ± 1.5 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹), with p < 0.01. Hemoglobin levels increased more substantially in the hypoxic group (+1.2 ± 0.5 g/dL vs. +0.4 ± 0.3 g/dL; p < 0.01). Lactate threshold improved in both groups, with a slightly greater relative shift in the hypoxic group. Although both groups experienced reductions in resting heart rate, the hypoxic group exhibited a more notable trend (p = 0.08). Participants training in hypoxia reported higher perceived exertion early in the program, but adapted over time and reported enhanced psychological motivation. These findings suggest that normobaric hypoxic training using mask systems may confer superior improvements in aerobic capacity and hematological adaptation compared to normoxic training, supporting its application as an effective ergogenic method in competitive endurance athletes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wilber RL. Altitude training and athletic performance. Human Kinetics; 2004.

Levine BD, Stray-Gundersen J. “Living high-training low”: effect of moderate-altitude acclimatization with low-altitude training on performance. J Appl Physiol. 1997;83(1):102–112.

Millet GP, Roels B, Schmitt L, Woorons X, Richalet JP. Combining hypoxic methods for peak performance. Sports Med. 2010;40(1):1–25.

Lundby C, Millet GP, Calbet JA, et al. Does ‘altitude training’ increase exercise performance in elite athletes? Br J Sports Med. 2012;46(11):792–795.

Chapman RF, Stray-Gundersen J, Levine BD. Individual variation in response to altitude training. J Appl Physiol. 1998;85(4):1448–1456.

Gore CJ, Clark SA, Saunders PU. Nonhematological mechanisms of improved sea-level performance after hypoxic exposure. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(9):1600–1609.

Katayama K, Matsuo H, Ishida K, Iwasaki K, Miyamura M. Intermittent hypoxia improves endurance performance and submaximal exercise efficiency. High Alt Med Biol. 2003;4(3):291–304.

Bonetti DL, Hopkins WG. Sea-level exercise performance following adaptation to hypoxia: a meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2009;39(2):107–127.

Saunders PU, Telford RD, Pyne DB, et al. Improved running economy in elite runners after 20 days of simulated moderate-altitude exposure. J Appl Physiol. 2004;96(3):931–937.

Chapman RF. The individual response to training and competition at altitude. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(Suppl 1):i40–i44.

Brugniaux JV, Schmitt L, Robach P, et al. Living high-training low: tolerance and acclimatization in elite endurance athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;96(1):66–77.

Schmitt L, Millet G, Robach P, et al. Influence of “living high-training low” on aerobic performance and economy of work in elite athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;97(5):627–636.

Rusko HK, Tikkanen HO, Peltonen JE. Altitude and endurance training. J Sports Sci. 2004;22(10):928–944.

Fulco CS, Rock PB, Cymerman A. Improving athletic performance: is altitude residence or altitude training helpful? Aviat Space Environ Med. 2000;71(2):162–171.

Wehrlin JP, Zuest P, Hallén J, Marti B. Live high–train low for 24 days increases hemoglobin mass and red cell volume in elite endurance athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;96(3):289–295.

Terrados N, Melichna J, Sylven C, et al. Effects of training at simulated altitude on performance and muscle metabolic capacity in competitive road cyclists. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1988;57(2):203–209.

Wachsmuth NB, Volzke C, Prommer N, Schmidt W. The effects of classic altitude training on total hemoglobin mass in swimmers. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013;113(5):1199–1211.

Gore CJ, Hopkins WG, Burge CM. VO₂max and hemoglobin mass of trained athletes during high-intensity training. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1997;75(3):273–280.

Robach P, Schmitt L, Brugniaux JV, et al. Living high-training low: effect on erythropoiesis and maximal aerobic performance in elite Nordic skiers. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;97(6):695–705.

Saunders PU, Pyne DB, Gore CJ. Endurance training at altitude. High Alt Med Biol. 2009;10(2):135–148.

Calbet JA, Lundby C. Air to muscle O₂ delivery during exercise at altitude. High Alt Med Biol. 2009;10(2):123–134.

Chapman RF, Karlsen T, Resaland GK, et al. Defining the “dose” of altitude training: how high to live for optimal sea level performance enhancement. J Appl Physiol. 2014;116(6):595–603.

Gore CJ, Clark SA, Saunders PU. Nonhematological mechanisms of improved sea-level performance after hypoxic exposure. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(9):1600–1609.

Levine BD, Stray-Gundersen J. A practical approach to altitude training: where to live and train for optimal performance enhancement. Int J Sports Med. 1992;13(Suppl 1):S209–S212.

Millet GP, Faiss R, Brocherie F. Hypoxic training and team sports: a challenge to traditional methods? Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(Suppl 1):i6–i7

Downloads

Published

2025-09-01

How to Cite

1.
Giri H, Mohammad Pinjara F, Khan J, Kumar S, Varade V, Patira N, Gupta S, Pal R, A Choubisa C, Ansari AR. Comparative Effectiveness of Hypoxic Training Versus Traditional Sea-Level Training on VO₂ Max in Male Athletes Aged 20–30: A Randomised Controlled Trial. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Sep.1 [cited 2025Nov.5];14(19S):1074-80. Available from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/9054

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >>